C-2 and C-3 Arylation of Indoles
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1. Selective C-2 Arylation of (NH)-Indole via in Situ
Table 1. . C-2 Arylation of (NR)-Indoles (Substitution on Nitrogen)
Formation of Indole Magnesium Salts
entry
R
yield %a
entry
R
yield %a
1
2
3
CH3
Bn
Pr
88 (54)b
81
92
4
5
6
Ph
68
55
0
p-(CN)-C6H4
SO2Ph, SO2CH3, COCH3
a All values based on isolated yields. b Chlorobenzene used as donor and
dicyclohexylphenylphosphine as a ligand at 150 °C.
Scheme 2. The Key Reaction Pathways in the C-2 Arylation of
1-Methylindole
compatible with a broad array of functional groups.8 The effect
of N-substitution is pertinent to the discussion below and
deserves a note. N-Alkyl substituents including larger groups
such as iso-propyl or benzyl as well as N-aryl groups were well
tolerated, giving high yields of the corresponding 2-phenyl
products (Table 1). In contrast, N-acetyl- and N-methansulfonyl-
indole were completely inert, clearly indicating the need for
high electron density in the azole-ring. In this paper, we provide
a new mechanistic insight for the productive pathway, the
reaction between the aryl-palladium(II) intermediate and indole
(Scheme 2).
stemming from phenylation at the R-position to the nitrogen
atom (“nonelectrophilic” regiochemistry, Scheme 1). To inves-
tigate the basis of the observed regioselectivity, we first
examined whether the magnesium metal plays an important role
in determining the regiochemical outcome. For this purpose,
N-methylindole was selected as a model substrate.
Results and Discussion
The Reaction Order of Iodobenzene, Indole, and the
Catalyst. According to Scheme 2, the first step of the catalytic
cycle involves formation of an aryl-palladium(II) intermediate
via the oxidative addition of iodobenzene to a Pd(0) species.
The reaction rate for the phenylation of 1-methylindole was
measured over a range of iodobenzene concentrations (Sup-
porting Information). These kinetic experiments determined that
the reaction is zero order in iodobenzene, indicating that the
rate-determining step occurs after the oxidative addition, most
likely within the indole-functionalization sequence. Indeed, the
reaction was first order in both indole and catalyst (see
Supporting Information). This represents a favorable scenario
as kinetic isotope experiments may shed more light on the
mechanism of the C-H bond functionalization.
Alternative Mechanistic Pathways. There are three reaction
mechanisms that may rationalize the strong preference for C-2
arylation of indole: (1) the electrophilic metalation-migration,
(2) nonelectrophilic metalation of the 2-position, and (3) carbo-
metalation, that is, Heck-type reaction (Scheme 3). The elec-
trophilic substitution of the indole ring is well established, and
a strong preference for the 3-position is known.9 Thus, a C3 f
C2 migration (1,2-migration) of palladium has to take place if
this mechanism is operative. Alternatively, the direct C2-
palladation of indole via a nonelectrophilic pathway (e.g., via
σ-bond metathesis) would also explain the observed regiose-
lectivity. C-2 palladation of indole has been reported; however,
the presence of a strong directing group was required [cf.,
palladation of 1-(2′-pyridyl)-indole].10 The carbo-metalation or
the Heck-type reaction is also feasible; however, this pathway
requires anti-dehydropalladation (or anti-â-hydride elimina-
tion).11 To gain deeper insight into the mechanism of this
This new 1-methylindole substrate required a full-scale
optimization effort, which led to addressing two key issues: (1)
the choice of base, and (2) formation of the biphenyl side
product.8 The first issue was solved when we found CsOAc to
be an effective base, while MgO was ineffective, lending further
support for its role in the free indole arylation. The second
problem, the formation of biphenyl, was marginalized by
decreasing the palladium catalyst loading. The entire reaction
system can be described by a qualitative kinetic model shown
in Scheme 2. The first step, oxidative addition between
palladium(0) and the aryl-halide, proceeds to an aryl-palladium-
(II) intermediate which is partitioned between two major
competing pathways: (1) cross-coupling with the substrate to
furnish the desired product or (2) formation of byproduct
biphenyl. Despite its simplicity, this model suggested that the
formation of the major side product, biphenyl, may be dimin-
ished by simply decreasing the amount of catalyst.8 This
favorable adjustment was inspired by an informed assumption
that the biphenyl formation proceeds via a bimolecular trans-
metalation of the aryl-palladium species (Scheme 2).
Importantly, both the indole magnesium salt (Scheme 1) and
the 1-alkylindole (Table 1) showed a strong preference for C-2
arylation, validating the latter as a suitable model substrate for
the subsequent mechanistic studies. The resulting robust protocol
required low catalyst loading (<0.5 mol % of Pd) and was
(6) Palladium-catalyzed arylation of other electron-sufficient heteroarenes
afforded the “electrophilic regioselectivity”. (a) Ohta, A.; Akita, A.;
Ohkuwa, T.; Chiba, M.; Funkunaga, R.; Miyafuji, A.; Nakata, T.; Tani,
N.; Aoyagi, Y. Heterocycles 1990, 31, 1951-1958. (b) Sommai, P.-A.;
Tetsuya, S.; Yoshiki, K.; Masahiro, M.; Masakatsu, N. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1998, 71, 467-473. (c) Park, C.-H.; Ryabova, V.; Seregin, I. V.;
Sromek, A. W.; Gevorgyan, V. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1159-1162. (d) Li,
W.; Nelson, D. P.; Jensen, M. S.; Hoerrner, R. S.; Javadi, G. J.; Cai, D.;
Larsen, R. D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4835-4837.
(9) Jackson, A. H.; Lynch, P. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1987, 1215-
1219.
(10) (a) Tollari, S.; Demartin, F.; Cenini, S.; Palmisano, G.; Raimondi, P. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1997, 527, 93-102. (b) Nonoyama, M.; Nakajima, K.
Polyhedron 1998, 18, 533-543.
(7) Cobalt-catalyzed arylation of thiazole also furnished products consistent
with the “electrophilic regiochemistry”: Sezen, B.; Sames, D. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 3607-3610.
(8) Lane, B. S.; Sames, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2897-2900.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 22, 2005 8051