Organometallics 2002, 21, 3503-3505
3503
F in e-Tu n in g th e Ba sicity of Meta l Com p lexes:
Rever sible Oxid a tive Ad d ition of Se-Se Bon d s to
P la tin u m (II) P r ecu r sor s
Achille Panunzi, Giuseppina Roviello, and Francesco Ruffo*
Dipartimento di Chimica, Universita` di Napoli “Federico II”,
Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia, I-80126, Napoli, Italy
Received May 20, 2002
Summary: The oxidative addition of diselenides to novel
platinum(II) precursors affording octahedral platinum-
(IV) products was investigated. The properties of the
substituents on Pt were finely tailored in order to prompt
easy reversibility of the reaction. This allowed the
achievement of the first example of equilibrium of
oxidative addition of an E-E bond (E ) chalcogen) to a
Pt(II) precursor. The equilibrium constants could be
evaluated by NMR spectroscopy, and the results were
preliminarily rationalized in terms of steric and elec-
tronic factors.
we5 and other researchers6,7 disclosed the occurrence of
tuneable equilibria in the oxidative addition of organotin
or organomercury halides to Pt(0)5 and Pt(II)6,7 precur-
sors of formula [Pt(N,N-chelate)(olefin)] (1) and [PtMe2-
(N,N-chelate)], respectively.
More recently, we have undertaken a study of the
oxidative addition of E-E bonds (E ) chalcogen) to
complexes of type 1 according to eq 2:8
[Pt(N,N-chelate)(olefin)] (1) + RE-ER )
[Pt(ER)2(N,N-chelate)(olefin)] (2) (2)
Oxidative addition and reductive elimination are
pivotal reactions that intervene in several catalytic
cycles and are widely used in synthesis (eq 1).1
The products 2 of reaction 2 are five-coordinate
complexes stabilized by the presence of a nitrogen
chelate with suitable steric hindrance. Within this
study, we have found that the reaction is again a rare
example of tuneable equilibrium, if the olefin is a
fumaric ester8 and the acid is dimethyl diselenide,
MeSe-SeMe. Instead, the reaction is totally shifted
toward the products when alkenes with reduced electron-
withdrawing properties (e.g., acrylic esters9 or ethylene9)
are employed. A rationale of this behavior can be traced
by considering that the metal-to-olefin π-back-donation
decreases as the acceptor features of the alkene de-
crease. Accordingly, the electronic density on the metal
center, and hence its basicity, grows.
On the other hand, as suggested by structural and
spectroscopic properties,10 the extent of π-back-donation
in complexes of type 1 is in all cases substantial. Thus,
despite the formal oxidation state of platinum, these
compounds exhibit a considerable Pt(II) cyclopropam-
etalate character (I in Figure 1), while the other possible
limit form II is less representative.11 As a consequence,
olefin Pt(0) and bis(hydrocarbyl) Pt(II) complexes are
expected to display a parallel chemical behavior.
This consideration has inspired the preparation of Pt-
(II) species [PtR′(R′′)(N,N-chelate)] (3) with chemical
LxM(N) + A-B ) Lx(A)(B)M(N+2)
(1)
Although the general features that favor the oxidation
of a metal according to eq 1 can be reasonably predicted,
the opportunity to assess the experimental validity of
these theoretical assumptions is very rare. This is
mostly because the oxidative additions are generally
totally shifted toward either the reagents or the prod-
ucts. Furthermore, the reactions are often accompanied
by other rearrangements, e.g., ligands loss2 or inser-
tions,3 which prevent the establishment of equilibria.
Direct information on the thermodynamics of the reac-
tion can be achieved when the oxidative addition is
reversible and involves measurable concentrations of
reagents and product at equilibrium (“tuneable equi-
librium”). In this rare case, any fine variation of the
coordination environment can have a quantifiable effect
on the equilibrium position and, hence, can be rational-
ized. Within this area, pioneering studies were per-
formed by using mostly Ir(I) Vaska’s complexes.4 Lately,
* Corresponding author. Fax: +39-081674090. E-mail: ruffo@unina.it.
(1) Collman, J . P.; Hegedus, L. S.; Norton, J . R.; Finke, R. G.
Principles and Applications of Organotransition Metal Chemistry;
University Science Book: Mill Valley, CA, 1987.
(2) Stille, J . K.; Law, K. S. Y. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 5841-
5849.
(3) Semmelhack, M. F. Org. React. 1972, 19, 115-198.
(4) Mondal, J . U.; Blake, D. M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 82, 205-
238. For other relevant examples on d8 ions, see also: (a) Amatore,
C.; Gamez, S.; J utand, A. J . Organomet. Chem. 2001, 624, 217-222.
(b) Scollard, J . D.; Day, M.; Labinger, J . A.; Bercaw, J . E. Helv. Chim.
Acta 2001, 84, 3247-3268. (c) Osakada, K.; Hataya, K.; Yamamoto,
T. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1997, 259, 203-211. (d) Fanizzi, F. P.; Natile,
G.; Lanfranchi, M.; Tiripicchio, A.; Laschi, F.; Zanello, P. Inorg. Chem.
1996, 35, 3173-3182. (e) Zamachshikov, V. V.; Litvinenko, S. L.;
Mitchenko, S. A.; Pryadko, O. N. Metalloorg. Khim. 1992, 5, 1272-
1279, CAN 119:226154.
(5) (a) Albano, V. G.; Castellari, C.; Monari, M.; De Felice, V.;
Panunzi, A.; Ruffo, F. Organometallics 1996, 15, 4012-4019. (b) De
Felice, V.; Panunzi, A.; Ruffo, F.; Åkermark, B. Acta Chem. Scand.
1992, 46, 499-500.
(6) (a) Puddephatt, R. J .; Rendina, L. M. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1735-
1754. (b) Levy, C. J .; Puddephatt, R. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
10127-10136. (c) Levy, J .; Puddephatt, R. J .; Vittal, J . J . Organome-
tallics 1994, 13, 1559-1560.
(7) Kuyper, J . Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16, 2171-2176.
(8) Albano, V. G.; Monari, M.; Orabona, I.; Panunzi, A.; Ruffo, F. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4352-4353.
(9) Ruffo, F. Unpublished results.
(10) De Castro, C.; Giordano, F.; Molinaro, A.; Orabona, I.; Ruffo,
F. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 651-655, and references therein.
(11) (a) Dewar, M. J . S. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1951, 18, C71-C79.
(b) Chatt, J .; Duncanson, L. A. J . Chem. Soc. 1953, 2939-2947.
10.1021/om020401i CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 07/19/2002