4
Tetrahedron Letters
a Reagents and conditions: 1 (0.22 mmol), RX (0.27 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), base
(0.4 equiv.), TBAI (10 mol%), solvent (2.0 mL), 20 °C, 24 h; b Isolated yield
In conclusion, we have uncovered a novel reactivity of
potassium allyltrifluoroborates towards sulfur dioxide. This
reaction does not require Lewis acid activation and proceeds with
characteristic regioselectivity for bora-ene reactions. The
obtained potassium 3-((allylsulfinyl)oxy)trifluoroborates can be
S-alkylated and S-arylated under basic conditions and thus
provide a novel entry to the synthesis of sulfones.
over two-steps from starting material 1.
Next, we examined the crotyl and prenyl systems in order to
determine whether formation of the potassium 3-
((allylsulfinyl)oxy)trifluoroborate system follows the bora-ene
pathway. Thus, potassium (Z)-but-2-en-1-yltrifluoroborate 7a32
and potassium trifluoro(3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl)borate 7b32 were
reacted with sulfur dioxide (Fig. 2, Scheme 2). The reaction of 7a
+ SO2 → 8a resulted in quantitative conversion in 30 min, but
required a reaction temperature of –10 °C (bp of SO2) due to the
additional steric hindrance in substrate 7a compared with
compound 1. Introduction of another methyl group in substrate
7b resulted in an extended time (2 h) for the full conversion to
sterically hindered sulfinate 8b at –10 °C. In both cases the
reaction progress was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig.
2). The latter clearly showed that compounds 8a and 8b
originated from reaction of the γ-center of the crotyl and prenyl
systems with the S-center of sulfur dioxide.
Acknowledgments
This work was financed by the Latvian Council of Science
Grant No 12.0291. A.S. thanks the Latvian Academy of Sciences
for scholarships. J.L. thanks L`ORÉAL Latvia with the support
of the Latvian National Commission for UNESCO and the
Latvian Academy of Sciences for “For Women in Science”
scholarship.
O
References and notes
R1
BF3K
7a,b
S
BF3K
SO2
- 10 o
O
1.
2.
Patai, S.; Rappoport, Z.; Stirling, C. J. M. The Chemistry of Sulphones
and Sulphoxides. Wiley: New York, 1988.
(a) Feng, M.; Tang, B.; Liang, S. H.; Jiang, X. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.
2016, 16, 1200-1216; (b) Ahmad, I.; Shagufta. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm.
Sci. 2015, 7, 19-27
C
R1 R2
R2
8a,b
full conversion by 1H NMR
7a, 8a: R1 = H, R2 = Me
7b, 8b: R1, R2 = Me
3.
Kalir, A. and Kalir, H. H. Biological activity of sulfoxides and
sulfones. In Sulphur-Containing Functional Groups; Patai, S.,
Rappoport, Z., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, UK, 1993;
pp 957-973.
Scheme 2. Reaction of crotyl- (7a) and prenyl (7b) trifluoroborate
4.
5.
(a) Kausar, A.; Zulfiqar, S.; Sarwar, M. I. Polym. Rev. 2014, 54, 185-
267; (b) Dizman, C.; Tasdelen, M. A.; Yagci, Y. Polym. Int. 2013, 62,
991-1007.
(a) Zajc, B.; Kumar, R. Synthesis 2010, 1822-1836; (b) Plesniak, K.;
Zarecki, A.; Wicha, J. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 275, 163-250.
Taylor, R. J. K.; Casy, G. Org. React. 2004, 62, 359-475.
(a) Fang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Xu, X. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 59661-59676. (b)
Meadows, D. C.; Gervay-Hague, J. Med. Res. Rev. 2006, 26, 793-814;
(c) Forristal, I. J. Sulfur Chem. 2005, 26, 163-185.
6.
7.
8.
(a) Gerhards, F.; Griebel, N.; Runsink, J.; Raabe, G.; Gais, H.-J. Chem.
Eur. J. 2015, 21, 17904-17920; (b) Markitanov, Y. M.; Timoshenko,
V. M.; Shermolovich, Y. G. J. Sulfur Chem. 2014, 35, 188-236; (c)
Seeliger, F.; Mayr, H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 3052-3058.
(a) Liu, N.-W.; Liang, S.; Manolikakes, G. Synthesis 2016, 48, 1939-
1973; (b) Brant, M. G.; Wulff, J. E. Synthesis 2016, 48, 1-17.
Figure 2. Selected regions of 1H-NMR spectra (300 MHz, DMSOd6)
showing the corresponding chemical shifts and multiplicity of vinylic protons
before (red dot) and after (blue dot) the bora-ene reaction. For transformation
9.
→5.77 ppm
→5.80
7a→8a : 5.44 ppm
; for transformation 7b→8b (5.15 ppm
ppm).
10. An, Y.; Xia, H.; Wu, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 1665-1669.
11. Zheng, D.; Mao, R.; Li, Z.; Wu, J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 359-
363.
12. Zheng, D.; Chen, M.; Yao, L.; Wu, J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 985-
988.
Contrary to sulfinate 2, compounds 8a,b appeared to be less
stable and were also directly submitted to sulfone synthesis.
Sulfinate 8b did not provide any isolable product when treated
under the optimised conditions for the synthesis of products 6a-k.
This can be explained by steric hindrance at the α-position to the
reactive S-center. Fortunately, the developed one-pot procedure
worked reasonably well using 7a and the expected product 9 was
isolated in 31% yield over 2 steps. No products arising from SO2
insertion at the α-carbon of the crotyltrifluoroborate system were
detected. The diminished yield of product 9 can be explained by
the reduced reactivity and partial instability of intermediate 8a
which apparently decomposes to butene and SO2.
13. Mao, R.; Zheng, D.; Xia, H.; Wu, J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 693-
696.
14. (a) Deeming, A. S.; Russell, C. J.; Willis, M. C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2016, 55, 747-750; (b) Shavnya, A.; Hesp, K. D.; Mascitti, V.; Smith,
A. C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13571-13575.
15. Luo, Y.; Pan, X.; Chen, C.; Yao, L.; Wu, J. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51,
180-182.
16. Zhang, W.; Luo, M. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 2980-2983.
17. Li, Y.; Zheng, D.; Li, Z.;Wu, J. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 574-578.
18. Aziz, J.; Messaoudi, S.; Alami, M.; Hamze, A. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2014, 12, 9743-9759.
19. Hayes, B. L.; Welker, M. E. Organometallics 1998, 17, 5534-5539.
20. Chen, L. S.; Su, S. R.; Wojcicki, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 5655-
5656.
21. Hu, Y. R.; Wojcicki, A.; Calligaris, M.; Nardin, G. Organometallics
1987, 6, 1561-1568.
22. O'Brien, S. J. Chem. Soc. A, 1970, 9-13.
23. (a) Bouchez, L.; Vogel, P. Synthesis 2002, 225-231; (b) Bouchez, L.
C.; Dubbaka, S. R.; Turks, M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6413-6418; (c)
Huang, X.; Craita, C.; Awad, L.; Vogel, P. Chem. Commun. 2005,
1297-1299; (d) Novosjolova, I.; Turks, M. Phosph. Sulf. Silicon Rel.
Elem. 2015, 190, 1251-1256; (e) Stikute, A.; Peipiņš, V.; Turks, M.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of sulfone 9 from potassium (Z)-but-2-en-1-
yltrifluoroborate (7a).