in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells compared with normal
breast tissue.5 In NIH-3T3 cells, PKC-ꢀ overexpression
causes them to become highly neoplastic and tumorigenic
toward nude mice,4 while PKC-δ overexpression halts
proliferation.4 In mouse keratinocytes, PKC-δ overexpression
results in apoptosis,6 while in rat vascular smooth muscle
cells, it causes a dramatic decrease in the levels of cyclins
D1 and E. The latter enzymes are critically involved in cell
cycle progression.7 PKC-δ overexpression in this system also
up-regulates p27, which is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibi-
tor.7 PKC-δ has additionally been implicated in the anti-
proliferative signaling pathway that is mediated by cell-
cell contacts.8 It will thus be appreciated that PKCs can not
only serve as oncogenes in certain circumstances but also
function as tumor-suppressors, depending upon their exact
levels of expression and their precise distribution within cells.
One naturally occurring antitumor agent that binds selec-
tively to a range of different PKC isoforms, to thereafter
modulate their levels of expression, is bryostatin 1 (1).5,9,10
It potently inhibits the growth of several cancer cell lines in
a way that correlates closely with its selective down-
regulation of PKC-R.5,9b It can also halt the growth of some
cell systems by apparently preventing certain PKC-δs from
undergoing down-regulation.11
So far, only Wender’s group has made substantial progress
on the bryostatin analogue/probe front,14 their team having
already identified several simplified structures that combine
good PKC inhibiting activity with powerful in vitro antitumor
effects (see Figure 1). Their cumulative data on this class
Figure 1. Some of Wender’s bryostatin analogues.
suggest (1) that a 20-membered macrolactone ring, contain-
ing an intact “Southern Hemisphere”, is needed for good
PKC binding activity; (2) that a C(3)-hydroxyl with (R)-
stereochemistry is important for a high enzyme affinity; and
(3) that a free hydroxyl at C(26) is essential for a good
interaction with PKC isozymes. Of further relevance is
Wender’s observation that the B-ring exocyclic olefin and
the A-ring can both be deleted from 20-membered macro-
lactone analogue structures without having serious conse-
quences for PKC-binding affinity.
Bryostatin 1 (1) binds to the diacylglycerol/phorbol ester
binding sites of phosphorylated PKC isozymes at two highly
conserved regions known as the cysteine-rich domains 1 and
2 (PKC CRDs 1 and 2),12 and in so doing, it creates ligated
proteins that have greatly differing intracellular translocation
properties,5 as well as differing susceptibilities toward
undergoing degradation13 (and down-regulation) at their final
intracellular destination(s).
One of the main goals of our PKC probe/analogue program
in the bryostatin area is to characterize the binding of our
simplified probe molecules to the CRDs of various human
PKCs by NMR methods. The primary advantage of using
this technique to identify novel probe structures is that one
can readily establish whether a particular analogue/probe is
binding to the relevant CRD of a human PKC in exactly the
same way as the lead structure (viz. bryostatin 1). The NMR
approach also allows small and often quite subtle changes
in ligand binding to be easily detected; these can subse-
quently be correlated with downstream effects on PKC
signaling and with the antitumor profile of a particular
analogue. The NMR method also gives precise information
on which amino acid residues must be targeted in a PKC to
produce a particular biological effect, enabling the rational
design of new analogues with tailored biological profiles.
At the outset of this project, we thought it important to
identify the minimum pharmacophoric elements of bryostatin
1 that would be needed for successful binding to the CRD2
of human PKC-R. Given that Wender and co-workers14 had
already demonstrated that substantial changes could be
Much has still to be learned about how the different PKCs
regulate cellular proliferation, differentiation, and morphol-
ogy, and it is clear that our understanding will only improve
if increased access is gained to novel PKC-interactive probe
molecules. The fact that bryostatin 1 can selectively modulate
PKC isozymes at very low drug concentrations, and simul-
taneously prevent tumor cell growth, makes it an especially
attractive lead for the design of new PKC probes, for there
is the added possibility that some of these structures will
themselves function as novel anticancer drugs through their
effects on deregulated PKC-signaling pathways.
(4) Mischak, H.; Pierce, J. H.; Goodnight, J.; Kazanietz, M. G.; Blumberg,
P. M.; Mushinski, J. F. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 20110.
(5) Stanwell, C.; Gescher, A.; Bradshaw, T. D.; Pettit, G. R. Int. J. Cancer
1994, 56, 585.
(6) Deacon, E. M.; Pongracz, J.; Griffiths, G.; Lord, J. M. Mol. Pathol.
1997, 50, 124.
(7) Fukumoto, S.; Nishizawa, Y.; Hosoi, M.; Koyama, H.; Yamakawa,
K.; Ohno, S.; Morii, H. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 13816.
(8) Heit, I.; Weiser, R. J.; Herget, T.; Faust, D.; Borchert,-Stuhltrager,
M.; Oesch, F.; Dietrich, C. Oncogene 2001, 20, 5143.
(9) (a) Kraft, A. S.; Smith, J. B.; Berkow, R. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.,
U.S.A. 1986, 83, 1334. (b) Jalava, A.; Lintunen, M.; Heikkila, J. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 191, 472.
(10) For reviews on bryostatin chemistry and biology, see: (a) Norcross,
R.; Paterson I. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2041. (b) Mutter, R.; Wills, M. Biorg.
Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1841. (c) Hale, K. J.; Hummersone, M. G.; Manaviazar,
S.; Frigerio, M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 413.
(11) Szallasi, Z.; Denning, M. F.; Smith, C. B.; Diugosz, A. A.; Yuspa,
S. H.; Pettit, G. R.; Blumberg, P. M. Mol. Pharmacol. 1994, 46, 840.
(12) Zhang, G.; Kazanietz, M. G.; Blumberg, P. M.; Hurley, J. H. Cell
1995, 81, 917.
(13) For the mechanism of PKC-R and -ꢀ degradation in human renal
epithelial cells and fibroblasts, see: Lee, H.-W.; Smith, L.; Pettit, G. R.;
Bingham Smith. Mol. Pharmacol. 1997, 51, 439.
(14) (a) Wender, P. A.; Hinkle, K. W.; Koehler, M. F. T.; Lippa, B.
Med. Res. ReV. 1999, 19, 388. (b) Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Bennett,
C. E.; Bi, F. C.; Brenner, S. E.; Clarke, M. O.; Horan, J. C.; Kan, C.; Lacote,
E.; Lippa, B.; Nell, P. G.; Turner, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
13648.
500
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003