Modulation of a Pathogen Response in Plants
A R T I C L E S
Figure 2. 1H NMR comparison of the anomeric region of oligosaccharides
2, 4, and 6.
Figure 1. (a) NaOMe, MeOH, rt, 4 h, 74%. (b) NaOMe, MeOH, 40 °C,
16 h, 84%. (c) NaOMe, MeOH, 40 °C, 3 days, 88%; CA ) chloroacetyl.
trisaccharide 2 PR-1 mRNA increased 4-fold 20 h after treat-
ment, with a decrease at 24 h. This treatment was also only
moderately effective in prevention of HR. The hexasaccharide
4 displayed a complete HR suppression at 100 µg per mL and
a partial response at 50 µg per mL. PR-1 expression in response
to 50 µg per mL of compound 4 was already increased 20-fold
at 12 h after treatment and 29-fold at 20 h, the timespan where-
after the bacteria were introduced into the tissue for the HR
suppression test. Nonasaccharide 6 caused complete suppression
at both concentrations used and a very marked increase of the
PR-1 gene expression, to 52- and 86-fold at 12 h and 20 h after
treatment, respectively. Although it is already established that
LPS can prevent the HR response9,10 and induce plant defense-
related genes,9 nothing is known about the recognition mech-
anisms of LPS in plants. To our knowledge this is the first dem-
onstration that short oligosaccharides can induce defense related
gene expression and prevent HR in a size-dependent manner.
To probe whether the biological activity of the oligomers 2,
4, and 6 is based on structural features associated with the
growing chain length, we analyzed the oligosaccharides by NMR
and both molecular mechanics and dynamics calculations.
Comparison of the anomeric regions (Figure 2) revealed distinct
H-1 signals for the residues A and B of all compounds, most
likely due to the anomeric benzyl moiety.
When one repeating unit was added as in 4, the new anomeric
signals, D, E, and F appeared near the shifts of the O-chain
polysaccharide isolated from Pseudomonas syringae pv.
Coronafaciens,11 which is comprised of the same repeating unit
as the synthetic rhamnans, used in this study. This evidence
supports that a regular secondary structure is building up
together with the chain elongation process. On the basis of the
observed proton chemical shifts, this regular conformational
motif was present in compounds 4 and 6 but not in oligosac-
charide 2.
Table 1. Ability of Compounds 2 (Trisaccharide), 4
(Hexasaccharide), and 6 (Nonasaccharide) To Induce PR-1 Gene
Expression in Arabidopsis thalianaa
time after treatment (h)
2
4
6
12
20
24
+1.9 ns
+4.2 ***
no change
+20.3 ***
+29.9 ***
+28.7 ***
+52.6 ***
+86.8 ***
+26.9 ***
a +: fold upregulated compared to water treated tissue. After normaliza-
tion to 18SrRNA. ns: not significant. *** ) P < 0.001.
Table 2. Ability of Compounds 2 (Trisaccharide), 4
(Hexasaccharide), and 6 (Nonasaccharide) To Suppress the HR in
Arabidopsis thaliana Caused by Pst AvrRPM1a
compound
2
4
6
control (H2O)
50 µg/mL
100 µg/mL
+
+
++
+++
+++
+++
-
-
a +++: complete suppression in inoculated area. ++: suppression in
25-80% of inoculated area. +: suppression in <25%. -: no suppression.
for 1 and an unpolar cosolvent because of their reduced
solubility in methanol) (Figure 1).
The series of compounds 2, 4, and 6 were tested for their
ability to induce PR-1 gene expression (Table 1) and to modulate
the hypersensitive response (HR), a programmed cell death of
plants triggered by avirulent bacteria (Table 2). The trisaccharide
2, the hexasaccharide 4 or the nonasaccharide 6 were dissolved
in water (50 µg ml-1) and infiltrated into 6 week old leaves of
Col-O. A further set of leaves was inoculated with water. The
plants were placed in a growth cabinet at 25 °C with 16 h of
light. The leaves were harvested 12, 20, and 24 h after
inoculation. The changes in PR-1 gene expression were followed
using quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis (see Supporting
Information).
For the HR suppression test, the oligosaccharide 2, 4, or 6
was infiltrated into 6 week old leaves of Col-O as aqueous
solutions (50 or 100 µg mL-1) and water as a control. After
20 h in a growth cabinet these leaves were inoculated with
Pst/aVrRPM1 in the pretreated and the control area, and
the elicitation of HR was monitored over 24 h (Table 2). HR
can be induced in Arabidopsis thaliana accession Columbia
(Col-O) after inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae pv.
tomato strain DC3000 carrying the avirulence gene aVrRPM1
(Pst/aVrRPM1)7 as described.8
Similarly, in compound 6, the three new residues G, H, and
I displayed proton resonances similar to those of the polysac-
charide and almost coincident to those of D, E, and F,
respectively, suggesting that residues in homologous position
in the sequence experience a similar environment.
(7) Debener, T.; Lehnackers, H.; Arnold, M.; Dangl, J. L. Plant J. 1991, 1,
289-302.
(8) Newman, M.-A.; von Roepenack-Lahaye, E.; Parr, A.; Daniels, M. J.; Dow,
J. M. Plant J. 2002, 29, 487-495.
(9) Dow, M.; Newman, M.-A.; von Roepenack-Lahaye, E. Annu. ReV.
Phytopathol. 2000, 38, 241-261
The panel of synthetic oligorhamnans showed a pronounced
chain-length-dependent induction of the PR-1 gene expression,
and in prevention of the HR in A. thaliana. In response to the
(10) Erbs, G.; Newman, M.-A. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 4, 421-425
(11) Zdorovenko, E. L.; Zatonsky, G. V.; Zdorovenko, G. M.; Pasichnyk, L.
A.; Shashkov, A. S.; Knirel, Y. A. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 336, 329-336.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 8, 2005 2415