the diffusion controlled reactivity of the Pd0 produced during
reductive elimination. Despite this high reactivity the system
still exhibits activation controlled behavior in the initial
encounter of Pd0 with the substrate in bulk solution leading
us to propose that these Pd0 species displaying distinctly
different reactivity are distinct entities. Although we have
yet to identify the origin of this duality of behavior, one
possibility is deactivation of the unicoordinate Pd0-NHC
species (I) produced during reductive elimination by reco-
ordination of the “throwaway” pyridine ligand to give a less
reactive dicoordinate Pd0 species (II).15 Our results suggest
that PEPPSI-IPr mediated polycondensations can be expected
to proceed by a catalyst-transfer chain-growth mechanism
with concomitant benefits in terms of product control. Despite
the success of phosphine supported catalysts in metal
mediated polycondensations16 drawbacks have been docu-
mented.7 Based on our results we propose that PEPPSI-type
catalysts have significant potential benefits in the synthesis
of functional polymers including the reduction in catalyst
loading, the potential to mount the kinetically stable Pd-NHC
unit on solid support,17 and the addition of sp3-sp2 and
sp3-sp3 coupling procedures, in which PEPPSI-IPr is
particularly competent, to the polymer chemists tool box.
Table 2. PEPPSI-IPr Mediated Negishi Cross-Coupling of
1,4-Dihaloarenesa
a All reactions were carried out with 1 equiv of n-BuZnBr as outlined
in Scheme 1. See Supporting Information for further details. b Yields of
1
2+3 are defined relative to n-BuZnBr and were determined by H NMR
analysis of the crude reaction mixture using mesitylene as an internal
c
1
standard. Ratios of 2:3 were determined by H NMR analysis.
once again observed (Table 2, entry 1). However, in the case
of dichlorobenzene 1l (entry 2) and ditriflate 1m (entry 3)
“normal” selectivity for the monobutylated product is
restored. This is reasonable since significantly higher activa-
tion barriers are associated with oxidative addition to Ar-Cl
and Ar-OTf bonds, and this increase in barrier height could
be expected to turn the diffusive separation of Pd0 species I
and the product of reductive elimination (Scheme 3) into
the preferred pathway.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by EPSRC
and the Royal Society. S.M.G. thanks the Leverhulme Trust
for an Early Career Fellowship. S.M.G. is a Royal Society
Research Fellow. We thank Dr. Tom Sheppard (University
College London) for helpful discussions.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimen-
tal procedures. This material is available free of charge via
In conclusion, we have observed the extremely selective
polyfunctionalization of polybromo aromatic compounds
mediated by PEPPSI-IPr which appears to be the result of
OL1027283
(11) (a) Stambuli, J. P.; Buhl, M.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 9346. (b) Stambuli, J. P.; Incarvito, C. D.; Buhl, M.; Hartwig,
J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1184. (c) Senn, H. M.; Ziegler, T.
Organometallics 2004, 23, 2980. (d) Gooꢀen, L. J.; Koley, D.; Herrmann,
H. L.; Thiel, W. Organometallics 2005, 24, 2398. (e) Kozuch, S.; Amatore,
C.; Jutand, A.; Shaik, S. Organometallics 2005, 24, 2319. (f) Ahlquist, M.;
Fristrup, P.; Tanner, D.; Norrby, P.-O. Organometallics 2006, 25, 2066.
(g) Ariafard, A.; Lin, Z.-Y. Organometallics 2006, 25, 4030. (h) Braga,
A. A. C.; Ujaque, G.; Maseras, F. Organometallics 2006, 25, 3647. (i)
Norrby, P.-O.; Ahlquist, M. Organometallics 2007, 26, 550. (j) Fazaeli,
R.; Ariafard, A.; Jamshidi, S.; Tabatabaie, E. S.; Pishro, K. A. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2007, 692, 3984. (k) Barder, T. E.; Biscoe, M. R.; Buchwald, S. L.
Organometallics 2007, 26, 2183. (l) Ikawa, T.; Barder, T. E.; Biscoe, M. R.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13001.
(15) During the preparation of this manuscript Organ and co-workers
suggested that the pyridine ligand throwaway ligand may in fact recoordinate
to the Pd center during the catalytic cycle both stabilizing the catalyst and
slowing down the catalytic cycle: Nasielski, J.; Hadei, N.; Achonduh, G.;
Assen, E.; Kantchev, B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Lough, A.; Organ, M. G.
Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 10844.
(16) (a) Yokoyama, A.; Yokozawa, T. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4093.
(b) Miyakoshi, R.; Shimono, K.; Yokoyama, A.; Yokozawa, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 16012. (c) Sheina, E. E.; Liu, J.; Iovu, M. C.; Laird, D. W.;
McCullough, R. D. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 3526. (d) Iovu, M. C.; Sheina,
E. E.; Gil, R. R.; McCullough, R. D. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 8649. (e)
Senkovskyy, V.; Khanduyeva, N.; Komber, H.; Oertel, U.; Stamm, M.;
Kuckling, D.; Kiriy, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6626. (f) Wu, S.;
Sun, Y.; Huang, L.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Geng, Y.; Wang, F. Macromol-
ecules 2010, 43, 4438.
(12) An alternative explanation in which diffusion controlled, irreversible
recapture of the Pd0 through π-complex formation by the product following
reductive elimination but prior to oxidative addition is qualitatively different
but functionally equivalent to diffusion controlled oxidative addition as we
propose, and these pathways cannot be differentiated here.
(17) (a) Schwarz, J.; Bo¨hm, V. P. W.; Gardiner, M. G.; Grosche, M.;
Herrmann, W. A.; Hieringer, W.; Raudaschl-Sieber, G. Chem.sEur. J. 2000,
6, 1773. (b) Schoenfelder, D.; Nuyken, O.; Weberskirch, R. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2005, 690, 4648. (c) Kang, T.; Feng, Q.; Luo, M. Synlett 2005, 2305.
(d) Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.-W.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Lee, Y.-S. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 6714. (e) Steel, P. G.; Teasdale, C. W. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004,
45, 8977. (f) Byun, J.-W.; Lee, Y.-S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1837. (g)
Polshettiwar, V.; Molnar, A. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 6949. (h) Sommer,
W. J.; Weck, M. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2007, 251, 860, and references therein.
(13) Chass, G. A.; O’Brien, C. J.; Hadei, N.; Kantchev, E. A. B.; Mu,
W.-H.; Fang, D.-C.; Hopkinson, A. C.; Csizmadia, I. G.; Organ, M. G.
Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 4281.
(14) The reaction between 1,4-dibromobenzene and n-heptylzincbromide
gave the same outcome as that reported in Scheme 1 for n-BuZnBr.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 1, 2011
149