9060
I. W. C. E. Arends et al. / Tetrahedron 58 (2002) 9055–9061
limited to 10 ml solutions. Hydroperoxides were stored
at 48C as dilute solutions, with the corresponding alkyl-
benzenes as solvent.
hexylbenzene and phenylcyclohexanol were 1.03 and 1.09
with respect to naphthalene, respectively.
The structures of products A and B (after reduction with
triphenylphosphine) were assigned qualitatively on the basis
of GC/MS data. Product B (rt was 18.2 min in the gas
chromatogram, see above) showed a molecular ion peak at
Mz 190 (1% relative intensity). The NIST MS database gave
a good match for the spectrum of 3-hydroxy-3-phenyl-
cyclohexanone (CAS: 25444-79-5; NIST entry 8202).
Major peaks: Mz 51 (19.5%); Mz 77 (55%); Mz 105
(100%); Mz 106 (9%); Mz 120 (38%); Mz 133 (6.5%); 146
(6%); Mz 172 (5%). The product A (rt was 19.3 in the in the
GC) gave a MI peak of 192 (2%) and as major peaks Mz 51
(16%); Mz 77 (53%); Mz 105 (100%); Mz 106 (11%); 120
(64%); 133 (4.5%); 174 (8.5%). Based on the fact that this
fragmentation pattern is very close to that of product B
(Mþ2), we assigned the spectrum of B to 3-hydroxy-3-
phenylcyclohexanol (although this could not be verified due
to the absence of this compound in the NIST database). For
qualitative analysis of products A and B a Rf of 1.0 with
respect to naphthalene was used.
4.2. Materials
AMDN (2,20-azobis(4-methoxy-2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile)
and ADVN (2,20-azobis(2,4-dimethyl valeronitrile) were
purchased from WACO, Pure Chemical Industries Ltd,
Japan (trade names V-65 and V-70, respectively). Cyclo-
hexylbenzene-1-hydroperoxide was prepared from the
corresponding alcohol using H2O2 and H2SO4, adopting a
similar reported procedure.19 All other chemicals were
from commercial sources. Cyclohexylbenzene was distilled
before use.
4.3. Typical experimental procedure
(For variations in amount of reagents etc. see footnotes in
tables.) Reactions were performed in a stirred three-necked
flask equipped with a condenser. A typical reaction mixture
consisted of 60 mmol cyclohexylbenzene (10.1 ml),
0.6 mmol of NHPI, 1.2 mmol of the cyclohexylbenzene-1-
hydroperoxide, and 4 mmol of naphthalene as internal
standard (quantities for specific experiments can be found in
the tables). 1 atm of oxygen was applied by first purging the
reaction mixture and protecting the reaction atmosphere
with a gas-burette filled with water. In this way the oxygen
uptake could be followed in time. After this the reaction was
brought to the reaction temperature and run for 8 h. Samples
were taken during and after the reaction. Samples were
cooled down, diluted with dichloromethane and enough
triphenylphosphine was added to reduce all the alkyl-
hydroperoxides present in the liquid to the corresponding
alcohols. Analysis followed with the GC. Iodometric
titration was performed to determine the amount of
hydroperoxide present in the reaction mixture. The amounts
of hydroperoxides given in Tables 1–3 correspond to the
total amount of the alcohols produced after reduction.
A close correspondence of the amount of hydroperoxide,
determined by iodometric titration, with the amount of
alcohols determined by GC, after reduction with triphenyl-
phosphine, was taken as evidence that only minor amounts
of alcohols are formed as primary products in reactions in
the presence of NHPI.
Given the fact that products A and B were analyzed after
reduction with triphenylphosphine, and that they were most
likely formed via intramolecular H-abstraction (see text)
in the 1-phenyl-cyclohexylperoxy radical (see structure 1 in
Scheme 5), their structure corresponds to 1,3-dihydro-
peroxy-1-phenylcyclohexane (A) and 1-hydroperoxy-1-
phenyl-3-cyclohexanone (B). To rationalize the formation
and substitution pattern (1,3 vs e.g. 1,2 or 1,4) of products A
and B, we performed a molecular mechanics calculation
using HyperChemw 7 (see also text).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank CREAVIS for financial support.
References
1. Hock, H.; Lang, B. Chem. Ber. 1944, 77, 257–264.
2. Sheldon, R. A.; Kochi, J. K. Metal-catalyzed Oxidations of
Organic Compounds. Academic: New York, 1981.
4.4. Analysis
3. Using a non-optimized procedure we were able to decompose
1-phenyl-1-cyclohexyl hydroperoxide completely in 3 h in
refluxing acetone, using 10 wt% of K10 montmorillinite
(a solid acid) to phenol and cyclohexanone (1:1).
Products were analyzed after reduction with triphenyl-
phosphine by GC, using naphthalene as an internal standard
and a CP-Sil-5 CB (50 m£0.53 mm) column. Qualitative
and quantitative analysis of 1-phenylcyclohexanol, 2-phenyl-
cyclohexanol and 4-phenylcyclohexanol (obtained by
reduction of 1-, 2- and 4-substituted cyclohexylbenzene
hydroperoxide) was achieved by comparison with authentic
samples. 1- and 2-phenylcyclohexanol were obtained from
commercial sources, while 4-phenylcyclohexanol was
synthesized by catalytic reduction of 4-phenylcyclohexa-
none. The retention times of cyclohexylbenzene, 1-, 2- and
4-phenylcyclohexanol were 13.7, 16.0, 16.7 and 16.9 min,
respectively (temp. program: init. temp 1008C. for 5 min,
followed by 58/min to 2208C). The molar responses Rf
(defined as (Asubstr/AIS)/(Csubstr/CIS)) determined for cyclo-
4. The dehydrogenation of cyclohexanone to phenol is a standard
process, see e.g. Jordan, W.; Barneveld, H.; van Gerlich, O.;
Kleine-Boymann, M.; Ullrich, J. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of
Industrial Chemistry, VCH: Weinheim, 1991; Vol. A19. p
307.
5. (a) Struijk, J.; Scholten, J. J. F. Appl. Catal. A 1992, 82,
277–287. (b) Augustine, R. L. Heterogeneous Catalysis for
the Synthetic Chemist. Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996; p 405.
6. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Rothenberg, G.; Lando, G.; Agbaria, K.;
Kazanci, M.; Sasson, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 455–458.
7. (a) Rylander, P. N. Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic
Syntheses. Academic: New York, 1979; p 179. (b) Steele, D. R.
U.S. Patent 3,387,048 to Engelhard Ind., 1968.