G. Arabaci et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 3047–3050
3049
result of reduced binding affinity (compare compounds
3 and 4 in Table 1). The reason behind the reduced
potency is not entirely clear but does not appear to be
steric in origin, since a fluorine atom is not substantially
larger than a hydrogen atom.
The data in Table 2 suggest that it may be difficult to
further improve the inhibitor potency by modifying the
structure of the phenyl ring. We thus decided to assess
the possibility of appending additional binding domains
to the para (or meta) position of the phenyl ring. Our
rationale is that the additional binding domain would
interact with the substrate-binding surfaces near the
active site. These interactions should increase both the
binding affinity and selectivity of the inhibitor. As a
proof of principle, we attached a tripeptide, Gly-Glu-
Glu, to the carboxyl group of inhibitor 6 to produce the
peptidyl bromoacetophenone 19 (Fig. 2). This tripep-
tide, when attached to the para position of cinnamic
acid, results in a highly potent inhibitor against PTP1B
(KI=79 nM).7a As expected, compound 19 is a highly
potent inactivator of PTP1B, with a KI of 2.8 mM, a
kinact of 1.2 minÀ1, and an overall inhibition constant
(kinact/KI) of 4.3Â105 MÀ1 minÀ1 (Table 3). The corre-
sponding values of inhibitor 13 against PTP1B are 42
mM, 0.57 minÀ1, and 1.4Â104 MÀ1 minÀ1, respectively.8
Compound 19 also shows drastically improved potency
(25-fold) against SHP-1, when compared to the parent
molecule (6). In contrast, attachment of a positively
charged tripeptide Gly-Arg-Arg to inhibitor 6 decreased
the overall potency by 1.5-fold (compared 6 and 20 in
Table 3). It is known that PTP1B and SHP-1 prefer
substrates that contain acidic residues N-terminal to the
pY and disfavor pY peptide containing positively
charged residues at these positions.11
Figure 3. Comparison of the inactivation kinetics of PTP1B and SHP-
1 by 21. The apparent inactivation rate kobs was determined as descri-
bed.8 The lines represent the best fits to the data according to equa-
ꢀ
tion: kobs=kinact [I]/(KI + [I]).
PTPs. While perturbation of the electronic properties of
the phenyl ring does not significantly improve their
overall potency against PTPs, attachment of a proper
peptidyl moiety to the para position can substantially
improve both the potency and the selectivity toward a
given PTP. It should be possible to develop membrane
permeable and metabolically stable inhibitors by
attaching peptidomimetics or small molecules to the
para position of a-bromoacetophenone. Furthermore,
since the covalent PTP inhibitor complex can be photo-
lytically cleaved to regenerate the PTP activity,8 these
molecules may provide a novel class of photolytic
switches for controlling cellular signaling processes.
Acknowledgements
To determine whether it is possible to generate inhibi-
tors with selectivity toward a particular PTP, we
attached Gly-Glu-Glu to acid 18 via a rigid biphenyl
linker and tested the resulting compound (21 in Fig. 2)
against both PTP1B and SHP-1. While inhibitor 21 has
a KI value of 9.9 mM and a kinact/KI value of 3.6Â104
MÀ1 minÀ1 against PTP1B, it does not show saturation
at 200 mM and has a kinact/KI value of 666 MÀ1 minÀ1
against SHP-1 (Fig. 3 and Table 3). This represents a
54-fold selectivity toward PTP1B.
This work was supported by National Institutes of
Health (AI 40575).
References and Notes
1. (a) Neel, B. G.; Tonks, N. K. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1997, 9,
193. (b) Tonks, N. K.; Neel, B. G. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001,
13, 182.
2. Zhang, Z.-Y. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 416.
3. Elchelby, M.; Payette, P.; Michaliszyn, E.; Cromlish, W.;
Collins, S.; Lee Loy, A.; Normandin, D.; Cheng, A.; Himms-
Hagen, J.; Chan, C.-C.; Ramanchandran, C.; Gresser, M. J.;
Tremblay, M. L.; Kennedy, B. P. Science 1999, 283, 1544.
4. For examples, see: (a) Burke, T. R., Jr.; Kole, H. K.;
Roller, P. P. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 204, 129.
(b) Taylor, W. P.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Widlanski, T. S. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 1996, 4, 1515. (c) Taylor, S. D.; Kotoris, C. C.; Dinaut,
A. N.; Wang, Q.; Ramachandran, C.; Huang, Z. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 1998, 6, 1457. (d) Taing, M.; Keng, Y.-F.; Shen, K.;
Wu, L.; Lawrence, D. S.; Zhang, Z.-Y. Biochemistry 1999, 38,
3793. (e) Shen, K.; Keng, Y.-F.; Wu, L.; Guo, X.-L.; Lawr-
ence, D. S.; Zhang, Z.-Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 47311.
5. For examples, see: (a) Ye, B.; Akamatsu, M.; Shoelson,
S. E.; Wolf, G.; Giogetti-Peraldi, S.; Yan, X.; Roller, P. P.;
Burke, T. R., Jr. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4270. (b) Burke,
T. R., Jr.; Ye, B.; Akamatsu, M.; Ford, H.; Yan, X. J.; Kole,
H. K.; Wolf, G.; Shoelson, S. E.; Roller, P. P. J. Med. Chem.
1996, 39, 1021. (c) Akamatsu, M.; Roller, P. P.; Chen, L.;
In summary, we have shown that a-bromoacetophenone
provides an effective, neutral pY mimetic inhibitor of
Table 3. Effect of derivatization with peptides
Compd
KI, (mM)a
kinact, (minÀ1 a
)
kinact/KI, (MÀ1minÀ1
)
6
18
193Æ38b
220Æ64
29Æ4
1.8Æ0.3
1.0Æ0.2
6.6Æ0.4
1.2Æ0.1
4.8Æ0.6
>0.13
9300b
4550
229,000
429,000
6300
19
19 (PTP1B)
20
21
2.8Æ0.5
760Æ150
>200
666
36,000
21(PTP1B)
9.9Æ1.0
0.36Æ0.01
aUnless indicated otherwise, values are meansÆSD of SHP1 from
three experiments.
bData from ref 8.