180
M.P. Freitas et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 570 62001) 175±180
reveals a bonding interaction between nX and nO,
except for iodine. However, it should be borne in
mind that the I±O bond order value was calculated
using a different basis set in relation to F, Cl and Br.
Obviously, the increase in the halogen atom size
results in an increase of nX and nO repulsion, leading
to the data of Table 2, where Ieq±eq/Iax±ax decreases
from 41.4 when X F to 5.5 when X I. This means
that the ax±ax conformation population increases
aproximately from 2% when X F to 15% when
X I.Thelast®gureswereobtainedtakingintoaccount
that Ieq±eq/Iax±ax < peq±eq/pax±ax ?p percentage) and
peq±eq 1 pax±ax 100%: Again, these values are quali-
tative, since the molar absorptivity values between the
conformers must be different.
Thus, it can be concluded that the main factor for
the preference of the eq±eq over ax±ax conformation
in trans-2-¯uorocyclohexanol is hydrogen bonding,
while for the chloro-, bromo- and iodo-derivatives,
the gauche effect and hydrogen bonding, as well as
the steric effect, are important. The increase of the
halogen atom size leads to a signi®cant increase in
the ax±ax conformation population.
References
[1] N.S. Ze®rov, Tetrahedron 33 ?1977) 3193.
[2] N.S. Ze®rov, L.G. Gurvich, A.S. Shashkov, M.Z. Krimer,
Â
E.A. Vorobeva, Tetrahedron 32 ?1976) 1211.
[3] N.D. Epiotis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 ?1973) 3087.
[4] P. Collins, R. Ferrier, Monossaccharides Ð Their Chemistry
and Their Roles in Natural Products, Wiley, New York, 1995.
[5] R.J. Abraham, T.A.D. Smith, W.A. Thomas, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 ?1996) 1949.
[6] H. Bodot, D.D. Dicko, Y. Gounelle, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.
?1967) 870.
[7] C.O. Guss, R. Rosenthal, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 ?1955) 2549.
[8] M.J. Frisch, C.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria,
M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, V.G. Zakrzewski, J.A.
Montgomery, R.E. Stratmann, J.C. Burant, S. Dapprich,
J.M. Millam, A.D. Daniels, K.N. Kudin, M.C. Strain, O.
Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B.
Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J.
Ochterski, G.A. Petersson, P.Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Moro-
kuma, D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachavi, J.B.
Foresman, J. Ciolowski, J.V. Ortiz, A.G. Baboul, B.B.
Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi,
R. Gomperts, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith, M.A. Al-
Laham, C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M.
Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B.G. Johnson, W. Chen,
M.W. Wong, J.L. Andres, M. Head-Gordon, E.S.
Replogle, J.A. Pople, Gaussian 98, Gaussian Inc.,
Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
Acknowledgements
[9] Y. Shiratori, M. Kato, Y. Taniguchi, Spectrochim. Acta A 55
?1999) 2659.
[10] J.B. Foresman, A. Frisch, Exploring Chemistry with Elec-
tronic Structure Methods, 2nd ed. 1996 ?120 pp.).
We acknowledge FAPESP for ®nancial support of
this research, a scholarship ?to M.P.F.) and a fellow-
ship ?to C.F.T.), CNPq for a fellowship ?to R.R.), and
CENAPAD-SP for the computer facilities ?Gaussian
98).
[11] E.L. Eliel, S.H. Wilen, L.N. Mander, Stereochemistry of
Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1994 ?711 pp.).
[12] N.S. Ze®rov, V.V. Samoshin, O.A. Subbotin, V.I. Bara-
nenkov, Tetrahedron 34 ?1978) 2953.