Communication
lene
diamine
(DMEDA),
N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylene
diamine (TMEDA), or 2,2-dime-
thylpropanoic acid (PivOH) did
not improve the yield of 6a
(Table 1, entries 10–15). On the
other hand, addition of K2CO3
or Cs2CO3 could increase the
Scheme 2. Proposed one-pot four-component reaction leading to pyrimido[4,5-b]quinolin-4-ones.
one step back to check whether 6a could be obtained from
the reaction of 1a with 2 and 3a. Thus, 1a was treated with 2
and 3a in the presence of CuI (0.1 equiv) in DMF for 6 h. To
our delight, it afforded 6a in a yield of 41% (Table 1, entry 1).
Encouraged by this preliminary result, thorough optimization
yield of 6a (entries 17, 18) while Na2CO3 or K3PO4·3H2O showed
no obvious effect (entries 16, 19). Upon further screening, to
our pleasure, we found that raising the reaction temperature
from 808C to 1008C could increase the yield of 6a from 55%
to 60% (Table 1, entries 17, 20). A temperature higher than
1008C showed an adverse effect (entry 21). Furthermore, it was
observed that raising the amount of Cu(OAc)2 from 0.1 equiv
to 0.2 equiv did not improve the reaction obviously (Table 1,
entry 22). On the other hand, no formation of 6a was observed
without a copper catalyst (Table 1, entry 23). In summary, treat-
ing 1a, 2, and 3a with 0.1 equiv of Cu(OAc)2 and 1 equiv of
K2CO3 in DMSO at 1008C for 6 h afforded 6a in a yield of 60%.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the scope
and generality of this cascade reaction leading to 2-aminoqui-
noline-3-carboamides (6) were explored. Firstly, several 2-bro-
mobenzaldehydes (1) bearing different substituents were stud-
ied as possible substrates to react with 2 and 3a. The results
listed in Table 2 showed that they underwent this cascade re-
action successfully and produced the desired 2-aminoquino-
line-3-carboamides in yields ranging from 48% to 60%
(Table 2, entries 1–8). Various functional groups, such as fluoro,
chloro, trifluoromethyl, methyl, and methoxyl were well tolerat-
ed under the reaction conditions. Then, some N-substituted cy-
anoacetamides (3) were also tested. We were pleased to find
that propyl-, benzyl-, phenethyl-, and cyclopropyl-substituted
cyanoacetamides reacted with different 2-bromobenzalde-
hydes and aqueous ammonia smoothly to give N-substituted
2-aminoquinoline-3-carboamides in moderate yields (Table 2,
entries 9–16).
Table 1. Optimization for the formation of 2-aminoquinoline-3-carboa-
mide (6a).[a]
Entry Cu source Solvent Ligand
Base
T [8C] Yield [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuBr
CuCl
CuCl2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
DMF
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
41
37
33
45
44
36
41
42
48
41
46
45
49
48
43
40
55
52
44
60
57
62
–
dioxane
iPrOH
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
9
–
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DMAP
l-Proline
1,10-phen
DMEDA
TMEDA
PivOH
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Na2CO3
K2CO3
Cs2CO3
K3PO4·3H2O 80
Having confirmed that 2-aminoquinoline-3-carboamides (6)
could be smoothly formed via the reaction of 1, 2, and 3, we
proceeded to try our proposed synthesis of pyrimido[4,5-b]qui-
nolinone as shown in Scheme 2 again, yet following an alterna-
tive operational method. Thus, instead of treating the mixture
of 1a, 2, 3a, and 4a with copper catalyst, 1a, 2, and 3a were
firstly treated with Cu(OAc)2 and K2CO3 in DMSO at 1008C for
6 h, and then benzaldehye (4a) was added. The resulting mix-
ture was stirred at 1008C under air for 2 h. Subsequent workup
of the reaction gave the desired pyrimido[4,5-b]quinolin-4(3H)-
one (5a) in a yield of 46% (Scheme 3).
Encouraged by this promising result, the generality for the
synthesis of 5 was studied with different 2-bromoaldehydes
(1), cyanoacetamides (3), and aldehydes (4). The results listed
in Table 3 showed some notable features: 1) 2-bromobenzalde-
hydes of various substitution patterns took part in this cascade
process smoothly and produced a series of pyrimido[4,5-b]qui-
nolin-4(3H)-ones (5) in reasonably good yields; 2) in addition
to cyano-acetamide (3a), its N-substituted analogues were also
suitable for this reaction; 3) aryl aldehydes (4) with either elec-
Cu(OAc)2 DMSO
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
100
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
–
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
110
100
100
[c]
[a] The reactions were run with 0.5 mmol of 1a, 0.5 mmol of 3a,
0.1 mmol of additive, 0.05 mmol of catalyst, 0.5 mmol of base, and 1 mL
of 26% aqueous ammonia (2) in 2 mL of solvent in a sealed tube for 6 h.
[b] Isolated yield. [c] 0.1 mmol of Cu(OAc)2.
of the reaction conditions was then carried out. Firstly, 1,4-di-
oxane, iPrOH, or DMSO was tried as the reaction medium
(Table 1, entries 2–4). Among them, DMSO gave a better yield
of 6a while iPrOH and 1,4-dioxane were less effective com-
pared with DMF. Experiments with different copper salts
showed that Cu(OAc)2 was more effective than CuI, CuBr, CuCl,
CuCl2, or Cu(OTf)2 for this reaction (Table 1, entries 4–9). In the
next stage, the effect of several additives was also studied by
using Cu(OAc)2 as catalyst and DMSO as solvent. It was found
that addition of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), l-proline,
1,10-phenanthroline hydrate (1,10-phen), N,N’-dimethylethy-
&
&
Chem. Asian J. 2014, 9, 1 – 7
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!