Table 2 Quantum yields and extinction coefficients at lmax for in-
dolylethenylanhydrides 7–10 in toluene
Table 3 Thermal and photochemical stability of compounds 3–10
Thermal stability
Photochemical stability
# of
lmax/nm (emax
/
(mol21 L cm21))
488 nm
FZC
—
A/A0
A/A0
(C-form)a
%/
Cycle
605 nm PSS488nm
(Z-form)a
Cycles
A/A0
Z-form
C-form
FCZ
FCZ
C+Z
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.29b
0.28b
0.27b
0.27b
1.00d
1.00d
1.00d
1.00d
0.86
0.92
0.49
0.13
1200
700
900
900
0.81
0.79
0.81
0.94
0.018
0.030
0.023
0.006
a
7
8
9
485 (2000)
—
—
—
—
495 (2400) 545 (5800) 0.016
460 (1200) 516 (6300) 0.071
10 464 (1100) 535 (6300) 0.063
a No C-form was obtained upon irradiation with visible light.
0.044
0.043
0.028
0.044
0.037
0.018
20+80
28+72
38+62
c
c
c
c
–
–
–
–
0.98
0.96
0.94
600
500
600
1.00d
1.00d
1.00d
0.00
0.00
0.00
a Absorbance at lmax relative to initial absorbance after 168 h at 80 °C.
b Residual absorbance due to thermolysis products. c No C-form generated.
d No loss of absorbance within experimental error
The most notable characteristic of indolylethenylanhydrides
was their outstanding thermal and photochemical stability
(Table 3). While the Z-forms of cycloalkylidene fulgides 3–6
were fully decomposed within 4 h at 80 °C in PMMA,
(poly(methyl methacrylate)), the corresponding indolyletheny-
lanhydrides lost no absorbance after 3 weeks at 80 °C. The C-
forms of 8–10 maintain comparable thermal stability. In
addition, compounds 8–10 exhibited no loss of absorbance after
500 or more photochemical cycles in toluene (irradiation to
90% PSS with 436 nm light followed by quantitative bleaching
with > 630 nm light). In comparison, bis(indolyl) diarylethenes
degrade by more than 20% after 100 cycles in cyclohexane and
are thermally unstable at room temperature.11 Monoindolylmo-
nothiophene diarylethenes are more thermally stable, > 12 h at
80 °C.1 The thermal and photochemical stabilities of cycloalk-
ylidene fulgides 3–6 were similar to previously studied
fluorinated indolylfulgides.5
In summary, we have designed and synthesized a new class of
photochromic compounds based upon the thermolysis of the
fluorinated indolylfulgide precursors. The resulting indolyle-
thenylanhydrides possess outstanding thermal and photo-
chemical stability, making them candidates for a wide range of
practical applications. Optimization of the spectral character-
istics and examination of the wavelength dependency of the
PSS compositions is ongoing.
Fig. 1 Absorption spectra of indolylethenylanhydride 8 in toluene.
for the Z- and C-forms is evident for cyclohexenyl methoxy-
substituted derivative 10.
As suggested by our initial results with 2, the Z-forms of
indolylethenylanhydrides 8–10 were found to undergo photo-
chemical electrocyclic ring closure, generating C-forms
(Scheme 4). Photostationary states (PSS) containing apprecia-
ble amounts of both the C- and Z-forms of compounds 8–10
were obtained upon irradiation with 488 nm light (Fig. 2). In
addition, each of the C-form compounds underwent quantitative
cycloreversion to Z-form upon irradiation with > 630 nm light.
Ring-closing quantum yields were greater for cyclohexenyl
compounds 9 and 10, while cyclopentenyl compound 8
displayed the highest ring-opening quantum yield when irra-
diated with 605 nm light.
Financial support from the National Science Foundation
(CHE9975076 to W.L.), the Army Research Office (MURI
program, DAAD19-99-1-0198 to R.B.), and the National
Institutes of Health (GM-34548 to R.B.) is acknowledged.
Notes and references
1 Y. Yokoyama, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1717–39; M. Irie, Chem. Rev.,
2000, 100, 1683; M. Irie, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1685–1716.
2 H. Durr and H. Bousas-Laurent; (Eds.) Photochromism, Molecules and
Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1990.
Scheme 4 Photochemical reactions of methoxy-substituted indolyletheny-
lanhydride 10.
3 J. C. Crano and R. J. Guglielmetti; (Eds.) Organic Photochromic and
Thermochromic Compounds; Plenum: New York, 1999; Vol. 1.
4 Y. Yokoyama and K. Takahashi, Chem. Lett., 1996, 1037–1038.
5 M. A. Wolak, N. B. Gillespie, C. J. Thomas, R. R. Birge and W. J. Lees,
J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2001, 144, 83–91.
6 M. A. Wolak, J. M. Sullivan, C. J. Thomas, R. C. Finn, R. R. Birge and
W. J. Lees, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 4739–4741.
7 A. M. Asiri and S. S. Al-Juaid, Indian J. Chem., Sect. B: Org. Chem.
Incl. Med. Chem., 1999, 38B, 488–490.
8 M. A. Wolak, N. B. Gillespie, C. J. Thomas, R. R. Birge and W. J. Lees,
J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2002, 147, 39–44.
9 C. J. Thomas, M. A. Wolak, R. R. Birge and W. J. Lees, J. Org. Chem.,
2001, 66, 1914–1918.
10 R. Ballani, G. Bosica, M. Damiani and P. Righi, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55,
13451–13456.
11 Z. N. Huang, S. Jin, Y. Ming and M. G. Fan, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.,
1997, 297, 99–106.
Fig. 2 Changing absorbance of a solution of methoxy-substituted in-
dolylethenylanhydride 10Z upon irradiation with 488 nm light; (a) 0 min,
(b) 1 min, (c) 3 min, (d) 7 min.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 992–933
993