Syn th esis of 3-Hexa h elicen ol a n d Its Tr a n sfor m a tion to
3-Hexa h elicen yla m in es, Dip h en ylp h osp h in e, Meth yl Ca r boxyla te,
a n d Dim eth ylth ioca r ba m a te
Filip Teply´,† Irena G. Stara´,*,† Ivo Stary´,*,† Adrian Kolla´rovicˇ,† David Sˇaman,†
Sˇteˇpa´n Vyskocˇil,‡ and Pavel Fiedler†
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
Flemingovo na´m 2, 166 10 Prague 6, Czech Republic, and Department of Organic Chemistry,
Charles University, Albertov 2030, 128 40 Prague 2, Czech Republic
stara@uochb.cas.cz; stary@uochb.cas.cz
Received March 20, 2003
A nonphotochemical synthetic route to 3-hexahelicenol is reported. It involves a key [2+2+2]
cycloisomerization of CH3O-substituted triyne that is readily available from 1-methoxy-3-methyl-
benzene and 1-bromo-2-(bromomethyl)naphthalene. Further functional group transformations led
to 3-CO2CH3, 3-NH2, 3-PPh2, and 3-SC(O)N(CH3)2 substituted hexahelicenes.
In tr od u ction
From a synthesis point of view, two different strategies
may be considered to introduce substituents: function-
alizing bare helicene skeletons or assembling helicenes
from functionalized building blocks. While the former
approach based on aromatic electrophilic substitution is
rare in the literature8 and usually suffers from low
regioselectivity, the latter approach is waiting for an
effective and modular method for the helicene synthesis
to be developed.9
Recently, we have revealed a new paradigm for the
nonphotochemical synthesis of tetrahydrohelicenes/heli-
cenes that is based on a key intramolecular [2+2+2]
cycloisomerization of aromatic triynes/cis,cis-dienetriynes
under Co(I) or Ni(0) catalysis.10 Herein, we disclose this
flexible methodology can easily be adapted to the syn-
Carbohelicenes are stable nonplanar aromatic systems
being inherently chiral.1 The indispensable prerequisite
to a wide exploitation of these molecules is availability
of their derivatives. Although much effort has so far been
devoted to the synthesis of carbohelicenes,2 in the hexa-
helicene series the functional group variety is limited to
OH or CO2H and their congeners.3,4 To the best of our
knowledge, only one monodentate phosphine,5 one bi-
dentate phosphine,5,6 one amine,7 and no thiol derivative
have been up to now described in the hexahelicene series.
† Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
‡ Charles University.
(1) For reviews, see: (a) Katz, T. J . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 1921. (b) Osuga, H.; Suzuki, H. J . Synth. Org. Chem., J pn. 1994,
52, 1020. (c) Oremek, G.; Seiffert, U.; J anecka, A. Chem.-Ztg. 1987,
111, 69. (d) Vo¨gtle, F. Fascinating Molecules in Organic Chemistry;
Wiley: New York, 1992; p 156. (e) Meurer, K. P.; Vo¨gtle, F. Top. Curr.
Chem. 1985, 127, 1. (f) Laarhoven, W. H.; Prinsen, W. J . C. Top. Curr.
Chem. 1984, 125, 63. (g) Martin, R. H. Angew. Chem. 1974, 86, 727.
(h) Wynberg, H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1970, 4, 65.
(4) For carboxylic acids and their derivatives, see: (a) Fox, J . M.;
Lin, D.; Itagaki, Y.; Fujita, T. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2031. (b) J anke,
R.; Haufe, G. Zh. Org. Khim. 1994, 30, 1365. (c) Hassine, B. B.;
Gorsane, M.; Geerts-Evrard, F.; Pecher, J .; Martin, R. H.; Castelet, D.
Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1986, 95, 557. (d) Hassine, B. B.; Gorsane, M.;
Geerts-Evrard, F.; Pecher, J .; Martin, R. H.; Castelet, D. Bull. Soc.
Chim. Belg. 1986, 95, 547. (e) Gorsane, M.; Defay, N.; Martin, R. H.
Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1985, 94, 215. (f) Kim, Y. H.; Balan, A.; Tishbee,
A.; Gil-Av, E. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982, 1336. (g) Balan,
A.; Gottlieb, H. E. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1981, 350. (h) Martin,
R. H.; Libert, V. J . Chem. Res. Miniprint 1980, 4, 1940. (i) Cochez, Y.;
Martin, R. H.; J espers, J . Isr. J . Chem. 1976, 15, 29. (j) J utz, C.;
Loebering, H.-G. Angew. Chem. 1975, 87, 415. (k) Martin, R. H. Chimia
1975, 29, 137. (l) Martin, R. H.; Cosyn, J . P. Synth. Commun. 1971, 1,
257.
(5) For monophosphine, see: Terfort, A.; Gorls, H.; Brunner, H.
Synthesis 1997, 79.
(6) For bisphosphine, see refs 3a and 5 and the following: (a) Reetz,
M. T.; Sostmann, S. J . Organomet. Chem. 2000, 603, 105. (b) Reetz,
M. T.; Beuttenmuller, E. W.; Goddard, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
3211.
(2) According to the CrossFire Beilstein database, more than 480
carbohelicenes are known within the [5]- to [14]helicene series.
(3) For alcohols and their derivatives, see: (a) Ogawa, Y.; Toyama,
M.; Karikomi, M.; Seki, K.; Haga, K.; Uyehara, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 2167. (b) Ogawa, Y.; Ueno, T.; Karikomi, M.; Seki, K.; Haga,
K.; Uyehara, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7827. (c) Reetz, M. T.;
Sostmann, S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2515. (d) Paruch, K.; Vyklicky´,
L.; Katz, T. J .; Incarvito, C. D.; Rheingold, A. L. J . Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 8774. (e) Thongpanchang, T.; Paruch, K.; Katz, T. J .; Rheingold,
A. L.; Lam, K.-C.; Liable-Sands, L. J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1850. (f)
Dreher, S. D.; Paruch, K.; Katz, T. J . J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 806. (g)
Meier, H.; Schwertel, M.; Schollmeyer, D. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C:
Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2000, 56, 684. (h) Nuckolls, C.; Katz, T. J .;
Katz, G.; Collings, P. J .; Castellanos, L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
79. (i) Meier, H.; Schwertel, M.; Schollmeyer, D. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1998, 37, 2110. (j) Katz, T. J .; Liu, L.; Willmore, N. D.; Fox, J . M.;
Rheingold, A. L.; Shi, S.; Nuckolls, C.; Rickman, B. H. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 10054. (k) Dai, Y.; Katz, T. J . J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
1274. (l) Nuckolls, C.; Katz, T. J .; Castellanos, L. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 3767. (m) Dai, Y.; Katz, T. J .; Nichols, D. A. Angew. Chem.
1996, 108, 2230. (n) Yang, B.; Liu, L.; Katz, T. J .; Liberko, C. A.; Miller,
L. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8993. (o) Hassine, B. B.; Gorsane,
M.; Geerts-Evrard, F.; Pecher, J .; Martin, R. H.; Castelet, D. Bull. Soc.
Chim. Belg. 1986, 95, 557. (p) Brown, J . M.; Field, I. P.; Sidebottom,
P. J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 4867.
(7) For amine, see: op den Brouw, P. M.; Laarhoven, W. H. Recl.
Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1978, 97, 265.
(8) For electrophilic substitution of parent hexahelicene, see ref 7.
(9) Most of the functionalized helicenes mentioned in refs 3-7 were
prepared from substituted stilbene-type precursors via impractical UV
light-mediated photodehydrocyclization or, in the case of hydroxy
derivatives, by benzoquinone cycloaddition to (bis)vinyl aromatics.
Although the latter approach published by Katz is quite general in
regard to the helicene skeleton, a substitution portfolio is very limited.
10.1021/jo034369t CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/24/2003
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5193-5197
5193