Molecular Pharmaceutics
Article
higher at later time points.21 When compared to [18F]-
FETMP,28 faster liver clearance for [18F]FMBTP and [18F]-
mFMBTP was observed. The liver uptakes of [18F]FETMP
were 16.25 2.77% ID/g at 10 min p.i. and 10.38 1.94% ID/
g at 120 min p.i., and only about 64% liver uptake was cleared
after 2 h injection, obviously slower than that of both
[18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP (more than 90% liver
accumulation was cleared from 5 to 120 min p.i.).
The accumulation of activity in kidney may due to the
electropositivity of [18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP, because
kidney tubules have some compounds with negative charges
which prefer to attract molecules with positive charges. Without
doubt, the [18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP were excreted
through kidney and finally washed out with urine. High bone
uptakes were also found in mouse biodistribution for both
[18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP, and the activity increased
continuously with time for [18F]FMBTP. The reason may due
to the defluorination of tracers in vivo (see Supporting
Information: Figure S3). Fortunately, there was no obvious
bone uptake in the PET imaging in rat and dog.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
NMR characterization, optimized radiolabeling conditions,
HPLC analysis, urinary metabolites in mice, and biodistribution
in rat. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
■
S
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiang’an South
Rd., Xiang’an district, Xiamen 361102, China. E-mail:
+86(592)2880645.
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
‡First author. College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University,
19 Xinjiekou Outer St., Beijing 100875, China. E-mail:
+8610-62208126.
In the study of [18F]3, Kim et al.5 claimed that highly
lipophilic structures (such as benzene rings) should not be
adopted for the radiolabeling of phosphonium salts because
they could increase liver uptake. But in this study, although
lipophilic structures were introduced as labeling intermediates
in both [18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP, their liver uptake
was cleared even much faster than that of [18F]3. For instance,
the liver uptake of [18F]FMBTP was 5.16, 1.89, and 0.89% ID/
g at 30, 60, and 120 min respectively, while that of [18F]3 was
4.52, 3.70, and 2.84% ID/g at 30, 60, and 120 min, respectively.
Furthermore, the introduction of the aromatic 18F-labeling
moiety does not increase the log P value of the tracers
([18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP have a log P similar to that
of [18F]FETMP28 and [18F]35).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We thank Yuan Chen, Zhide Guo, Pu Zhang, Yi Sun, and Lin
Wang for their generous help with biodistribution and PET
imaging. This project was sponsored by the National Key Basic
Research Program of China (2014CB744503) and the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (21271030, 20871020,
81301251) and supported partially by Department of Nuclear
Medicine of Peking Union Medical College Hospital.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Madar, I.; Ravert, H. T.; Du, Y.; Hilton, J.; Volokh, L.; Dannals,
R. F.; Frost, J. J.; Hare, J. M. Characterization of uptake of the new
PET imaging compound 18F-fluorobenzyl triphenyl phosphonium in
dog myocardium. J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 1359−1366.
When compared with the previously reported phosphonium
cations, these newly developed [18F]FMBTP and [18F]-
mFMBTP had higher heart/liver ratio and lower lung uptake
than those of [18F]FBnTP1,23 and [18F]FTPP.20,21 [18F]FBnTP
is metabolically stable and demonstrates excellent character-
istics in healthy mice.24 However, the slow liver clearance leads
to low heart/liver ratio,5 although a similar heart/liver ratio at
30 min had been reported for [18F]FTPP21 and [18F]mFMBTP
(this study), while the latter had much lower background
uptake in PET imaging of rat. When compared to [18F]FPTP,10
the [18F]mFMBTP reported here showed lower abdomen
uptake at 30 and 60 min after injection.
(2) Mou, T.; Zhao, Z.; Fang, W.; Peng, C.; Guo, F.; Liu, B.; Ma, Y.;
Zhang, X. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of 18F-labeled
pyridaben analogues for myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. J.
Nucl. Med. 2012, 53, 472−479.
(3) Mou, T.; Jing, H.; Yang, W.; Fang, W.; Peng, C.; Guo, F.; Zhang,
X.; Pang, Y.; Ma, Y. Preparation and biodistribution of [18F] FP2OP as
myocardial perfusion imaging agent for positron emission tomography.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 1312−1320.
(4) Gibbons, R. J.; Valeti, U. S.; Araoz, P. A.; Jaffe, A. S. The
quantification of infarct size. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 44, 1533−1542.
(5) Kim, D. Y.; Kim, H. J.; Yu, K. H.; Min, J. J. Synthesis of [18F]-
labeled (6-fluorohexyl) triphenylphosphonium cation as a potential
agent for myocardial imaging using positron emission tomography.
Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 431−437.
In this study, [18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP were
successfully prepared with high radiochemical yield 52
9.3% (n = 7, for [18F]FMBTP) and 50.6 6.9% (n = 7, for
[18F]mFMBTP) and more than 99% of radiochemical purity.
The mechanism of [18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP binding
with myocardial cell was verified and compared with classic
MPI agent [99mTc]sestamibi by in vitro cell uptake assays. At
the same time, both [18F]FMBTP and [18F]mFMBTP
displayed high uptake and good retention in the myocardium.
[18F]mFMBTP was further evaluated with PET imaging in rat
and dog to give high-contrast heart images with rapid clearance
from the liver, lung, and other organs. All of these preliminary
data strongly imply that it may be a useful tool for myocardial
perfusion imaging. The feasibility of [18F]mFMBTP will be
evaluated in animal myocardial infarction models, and the
structure will be modified to lower bone uptake.
(6) Knuuti, J.; Bengel, F. Positron emission tomography and
molecular imaging. Heart 2008, 94, 360−367.
(7) Bateman, T. M. Cardiac positron emission tomography and the
role of adenosine pharmacologic stress. Am. J. Cardiol. 2004, 94, 19−
24.
(8) Siegrist, P. T.; Husmann, L.; Knabenhans, M.; Gaemperli, O.;
Valenta, I.; Hoefflinghaus, T.; Scheffel, H.; Stolzmann, P.; Alkadhi, H.;
Kaufmann, P. A. 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion imaging with a
PET/CT scanner: impact on clinical decision making and cost-
effectiveness. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35, 889−895.
(9) Sampson, U. K.; Dorbala, S.; Limaye, A.; Kwong, R.; Di Carli, M.
F. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging
with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in
the detection of coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 49,
1052−1058.
(10) Kim, D.-Y.; Kim, H.-S.; Le, U. N.; Jiang, S. N.; Kim, H.-J.; Lee,
K.-C.; Woo, S.-K.; Chung, J.; Kim, H.-S.; Bom, H.-S. Evaluation of a
3830
dx.doi.org/10.1021/mp500216g | Mol. Pharmaceutics 2014, 11, 3823−3831