Letters
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2006, Vol. 49, No. 18 5413
Scheme 3a
(2) De Ferrari, G. V.; Canales, M. A.; Shin, I.; Weiner, L. M.; Silman,
I.; Inestrosa, N. C. A Structural Motif of Acetylcholinesterase That
Promotes Amyloid Beta-Peptide Fibril Formation. Biochemistry 2001,
40, 10447-10457.
(3) Mack, A.; Robitzki, A. The Key Role of Butyrylcholinesterase during
Neurogenesis and Neural Disorders: An Antisense-5′-butyrylcho-
linesterase-DNA Study. Prog. Neurobiol. 2000, 60, 607-628.
(4) Giacobini, E. Drugs That Target Cholinesterases. In CognitiVe
Enhancing Drugs; Buccafusco, J. J., Ed.; Birkha¨user Verlag: Basel,
Boston, Berlin, 2004; pp 11-36.
(5) Giacobini, E.; Spiegel, R.; Enz, A.; Veroff, A.; Cutler, R. E. Inhibition
of Acetyl- and Butyryl-cholinesterase in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of
Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease by Rivastigmine: Correlation with
Cognitive Benefit. J. Neural Transm. 2002, 109, 1053-1065.
(6) Messer, W. S. Bivalent Ligands for G Protein-Coupled Receptors.
Curr. Pharm. Des. 2004, 10, 2015-2020.
(7) Decker, M.; Lehmann, J. Agonistic and Antagonistic Bivalent Ligands
of Serotonin and Dopamine Receptors Including Their Transporters.
Curr. Top. Med. Chem., in press.
(8) Mun˜oz-Torrero, D.; Camps, P. Dimeric and Hybrid Anti-Alzheimer
Drug Candidates. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 399-422 and
references therein.
(9) Carlier, P. R.; Han, Y. F.; Chow, E. S.-H.; Li, C. P.-L.; Wang, H.;
Lieu, T. X.; Wong, H. S.; Pang, Y. P. Evaluation of Short Tether
Bis-THA AChE Inhibitors. A Further Test of the Dual Binding Site
Hypothesis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 351-357.
(10) Savini, L.; Campiani, G.; Gaeta, A.; Pellerano, C.; Fattorusso, C.;
Chiasserini, L.; Fedorko, J. M.; Saxena, A. Novel and Potent Tacrine-
Related Hetero- and Homobivalent Ligands for Acetylcholinesterase
and Butyrylcholinesterase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1779-
1782.
(11) Savini, L.; Gaeta, A.; Fattorusso, C.; Catalanotti, B.; Campiani, G.;
Chiasserini, L.; Pellerano, C.; Novellino, E.; McKissic, D.; Saxena,
A. Specific Targeting of Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinest-
erase Recognition Sites. Rational Design of Novel, Selective, and
Highly Potent Cholinesterase Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
1-4.
(12) Campiani, G.; Fattorusso, C.; Butini, S.; Gaeta, A.; Agnusdei, M.;
Gemma, S.; Persico, M.; Catalanotti, B.; Savini, L.; Nacci, V.;
Novellino, E.; Holloway, H. W.; Greig, N. H.; Belinskaya, T.;
Fedorko, J. M.; Saxena, A. Development of Molecular Probes for
the Identification of Extra Interaction Sites in the Mid-Gorge and
Peripheral Sites of Butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). Rational Design
of Novel, Selective, and Highly Potent BuChE Inhibitors. J. Med.
Chem. 2005, 48, 1919-1929.
a Reagents: (i) 3 equiv of n-butylamine, AgNO3, TEA, toluene, reflux,
2 h.
and 24 nM at BChE. Therefore, 8d is 16 times more potent at
AChE than the drug galantamine and 350 times more potent at
BChE. In contrast to the N-butylimines, 4-chloro substitution
only leads to a small increase (1.5-fold) in activity.
In contrast to the bis-tacrine compounds,10,16 the octameth-
ylene-bridged quinazolinimines showed even higher activities
than the heptamethylene-bridged compounds. Apart from the
chloro-substituted dimer 8f, all of the octamethylene dimers
showed BChE selectivity (from 5-fold to almost 200-fold). This
is on one hand due to a higher activity at BChE, which is highest
for the smaller ring sizes, especially the compounds with five-
and six-membered alicycles, i.e., 8g and 8h, which reach low-
nanomolar activities. On the other hand, activity at AChE
decreases with increasing size of the alicyclus; for the seven-
membered-ring dimer 8i 100-fold selectivity is reached, and for
the eight-membered-ring dimer 8j selectivity is 190-fold. But
because of the high nanomolar activities, 8i is still almost as
potent as galantamine at AChE, whereas 8i is 650 times more
potent at BChE than galantamine. The chloro-substituted 8f is
as potent as the unsubstituted 8g at AChE, whereas activity at
BChE is 10-fold lower.
The structure-activity relationships between tacrine and
quinazolinimines differ in two major points: chloro substitution
of the bivalent 8 does not (significantly) improve activity, and
optimal distance in terms of activity and selectivity toward BChE
is achieved by eight and not seven methylene groups, as for
bis-tacrines.10,16
In summary, the application of the bivalent ligand approach
to quinazolinimines as a novel class of cholinesterase inhibitors
proved highly successful. Inhibitory activities increased by a
factor of 100 for the heptamethylene-bridged compounds and
by a factor of 1000 for octamethylene-bridged inhibitors (at
BChE). Heptamethylene-bridged compounds are inhibitors
exhibiting similar activities at both enzymes with two-digit
nanomolar activities, whereas octamethylene-bridged inhibitors
exhibit increasing selectivity toward BChE with increasing size
of the alicycle, reaching a selectivity of approximately 190 for
the eight-membered-ring dimer. Small ring sizes show the lowest
selectivity but the highest activity.
(13) Decker, M. Novel Inhibitors of Acetyl- and Butyrylcholinesterase
Derived from the Alkaloids Dehydroevodiamine and Rutaecarpine.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 40, 305-313.
(14) Decker, M.; Krauth, F.; Lehmann, J. Novel Tricyclic Quinazolin-
imines and Related Tetracyclic Nitrogen Bridgehead Compounds as
Cholinesterase Inhibitors with Selectivity towards Butyrylcholinest-
erase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 1966-1977.
(15) Saxena, A.; Redman, A. M. G.; Jiang, X.; Lockridge, O.; Doctor, B.
P. Differences in Active Site Gorge Dimensions of Cholinesterases
Revealed by Binding of Inhibitors to Human Butyrylcholinesterase.
Biochemistry 1997, 36, 14642-14651.
(16) Pang, Y. P.; Quiram, P.; Jelacic, T.; Hong, F.; Brimijoin, S. Highly
Potent, Selective, and Low Cost Bis-tetrahydroaminacrine Inhibitors
of Acetylcholinesterase. Steps toward Novel Drugs for Treating
Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 23646-23649.
(17) Petersen, S.; Tietze, E. Die Reaktion cyclischer Lactima¨ther mit
Aminocarbonsa¨uren. (Reaction of Cyclic Iminium Ethers with
Aminocarbonic Acids.) Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1959, 623, 166-176.
(18) Jae´n, J. C.; Gregor, V. E.; Lee, C.; Davies, R.; Emmerling, M.
Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition by Fused Dihydroquinazoline Com-
pounds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 737-742.
All bivalent inhibitors synthesized greatly exceed the activity
of the established drug galantamine at BChE and, apart from
the most BChE-selective compounds 8i,j, also at AChE.
Acknowledgment. Financial support by the “Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie” (FCI) is gratefully acknowledged. Ap-
preciation is expressed to Petra Wiecha for technical assitance.
(19) Brown, D. J.; Ienaga, K. Dimroth Rearrangement. XVIII. Synthesis
and Rearrangement of 4-Iminoquinazolines and Related Systems. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 21, 2182-2185.
(20) Ellman, G. L.; Courtney, K. D.; Andres, V.; Featherstone, R. M. A
New and Rapid Colorimetric Determination of Acetylcholinesterase
Activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88-95.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures,
analytical characterization for 7a, 8a-j, 10-12, 13a,b, and
pharmacological procedures. This material is available free of
References
(1) Johnson, C. N.; Roland, A.; Upton, N. New Symptomatic Strategies
in Alzheimer’s Disease. Drug DiscoVery Today: Ther. Strategies
2004, 1, 13-19.
JM060682M