with moderate chemo- and stereoselectivities, the corre-
sponding glycosyl phosphates 4,6 which are extremely useful
and convenient glycosyl donors.8 Novel methods for their
preparation are very timely, due to their extensive use in
the first automated oligosaccharide syntheses recently de-
veloped by Seeberger.9
In this paper, we report that the use of nitrogen ligands in
this reaction gives tremendous beneficial effects in terms of
conversion of substrate, rate acceleration, product selectivity,
and diastereoselectivity of the epoxidation and allows
standard organic solvents to be used. This results in a novel
practical and convenient method for the synthesis of glycosyl
phosphates.
Although MTO/H2O2 (or UHP) has been used for the
epoxidation of a large variety of differently substituted
alkenes,10 its use with enol ethers is barely documented, while
a properly modified procedure has been reported for oxida-
tion of silyl enol ethers.11 Glycals proved quite sluggish
substrates toward MTO/UHP. When an up to 3-fold excess
of DBP was used in the domino epoxidation-phosphoryl-
ation, the conversion of tribenzylglucal (5) chosen as a model
substrate was incomplete in THF, CH2Cl2, CH3CN, and other
organic solvents. Dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
([BMIM]BF4) is necessary in order to force the oxidation to
completion. Ionic liquids are difficult to obtain with repro-
ducible purity and especially completely anhydrous; there-
fore, the competing ring-opening by water was always a
serious drawback and acceptable yields of glycosyl phos-
phates 6 and 7 were obtained only with a large excess of
DBP (g5 equiv). With such an excess of DBP, however,
the reaction went to completion also in common organic
solvents, affording better yields of glycosyl phosphates
(Table 1, entries 3 vs 2 and 7 vs 5). Moreover, the selectivity
of the reaction turned out to be quite solvent dependent, the
higher gluco/manno selectivity occurring with the more
coordinating solvent THF (Table 1, entry 7).
It is worth noting that, while 7 was obtained as the
R-anomer only, phosphate 6 was always produced as a
mixture of R- and â-anomers. However, this is not a critical
point, since both anomers participate in subsequent glycosyl
transfer affording the same product.12 Moreover, R-glycosyl
phosphates can be formed from the corresponding â-isomers
by temperature-dependent acid-catalyzed anomerization,
promoted by the excess of DBP in the reaction mixture, as
already shown by previous work.13 Therefore, anomeric
equilibration affords R/â ratios which are variable with
temperature and time, with the more stable R-glucosyl
phosphate prevailing at longer reaction time and higher
temperature. In our case, for instance, when the reaction was
performed at 0 °C (Table 1, entry 4), R-glucosyl phosphate
R-6 and â-glucosyl phosphate â-6 were obtained in 1:1.5
ratio. The same reaction afforded a 4:1 ratio in favor of the
R-anomer when carried out at 25 °C (Table 1, entry 3). The
R/â ratios found for each reaction are reported in the
Supporting Information.
The effect of DBP on the conversion suggested that DBP
might work as a donor ligand toward Re in the catalyst
precursor and/or catalytic species, thus influencing the
turnover rate and/or catalyst lifetime. We then decided to
test other better ligands for Re in this reaction, and
particularly nitrogen ligands, such as pyridine (Py), pyrazole
and 3-cyanopiridine, which have already shown beneficial
effects in epoxidation of alkenes, enhancing the reaction rate
and limiting the hydrolysis of epoxides to diols.10 Moreover,
the use of ligands should limit the DBP to be used to a
stoichiometric amount. Then, 1.2 equiv of DBP as nucleo-
phile and 0.5 equiv of the ligands reported in Table 2 have
been used in the model reaction in CH2Cl2 or THF.
The results in Table 2 (see the Supporting Information
for results with a larger number of ligands) demonstrate the
effectiveness of nitrogen ligands in promoting the reaction
with stoichiometric amounts of DBP. Oxygen ligands, such
as N-oxides, gave poorer results (entries 13 and 14). In the
absence of ligand, the reaction does not go to completion in
CH2Cl2 or in THF (Table 2, entries 1 and 2). With added
ligands, complete conversion is attained. Some of them are
particularly remarkable in terms of conversion of substrate,
rate acceleration, and facial diastereoselectivity of epoxida-
tion, which determines the selectivity at C-2 (gluco/manno).14
Table 1. “One-Pot” Synthesis of Glycosyl Phosphatesa
(6) Soldaini, G.; Cardona, F.; Goti, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5589-
5592.
DBP
(equiv)
time
(h)
conv (%)
(yield, %)b gluco/manno
epox select.c
(7) For a different example of one-pot oxidation-nucleophile addition,
see: Di Bussolo, V.; Kim, Y.-J.; Gin, D. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
13515-13516.
entry
solvent
1d
2
3d
4
5
6d
7
[BMIM]BF4
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
THF
THF
THF
CH3CN
5
3
5
5
3
5
5
5
3.5
5
100 (58)
80
5.5:1
(8) Palmacci, E. R.; Plante, O. J.; Seeberger, P. H. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 595-606.
1.5
6.5
4.5
1.5
7
100 (75)
100 (74)
60
3.8:1
2.7:1
(9) Plante, O. J.; Palmacci, E. R.; Seeberger, P. H. Science 2001, 291,
1523-1527.
(10) Adolfsson, H. In Modern Oxidation Methods; Ba¨ckvall, J.-E., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004; pp 32-43 and references therein.
(11) Stankovic, S.; Espenson, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4129-4130.
(12) Plante, O. J.; Andrade, R. B.; Seeberger, P. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
211-214.
60
100 (65)
100
9.8:1
3.8:1
8
7
(13) Plante, O. J.; Palmacci, E. R.; Andrade, R. B.; Seeberger, P. H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9545-9554.
(14) The found selectivities and reaction rates have no apparent relation-
ship with pKa values of the ligands, nor with equilibrium constants for the
coordination of used ligands with MTO, recently reported: Nabavizadeh,
S. M. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4204-4208.
a Conditions: (a) MTO (4 mol %), UHP (3 equiv), dry solvent, DBP, 0
°C; (b) Py, Ac2O, rt, overnight. b Isolated yields. c Calculated by integration
of the 31P NMR spectra of the crude mixtures. d Reaction performed at room
temperature.
726
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 4, 2005