10.1002/anie.201810451
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
above Fe-Sub-Pyr, Fig. 1A). Direct attack of Br onto 1a was not
successful in our calculations. This result, including the low barrier
for DMSO dissociation, indicates that Fe-carbene formation is the
initial step of the reaction. The carbene can then undergo
intermolecular attack by the nucleophiles Br or pyridine. Attack by
Br has a low barrier (TS_Br_on_carb, 6.1 kcal/mol relative to the
Fe-carbene) and leads to an unstable Fe-alkylBr intermediate (5.8
kcal/mol above Fe-carbene, Fig. 1A). We conclude that the
brominated alkyl species 10a observed in experiments (Scheme
7) is formed from the off-cycle Fe-alkylBr intermediate, which is in
rapid equilibrium with the on-cycle iron-carbene. Attack of pyridine
on the carbene has a higher barrier than Br attack, 11.8 kcal/mol
relative to the Fe-carbene (TS_Pyr_on_carb, Fig. 1A). However,
the resulting intermediate is low in energy (-12.2 kcal/mol below
the carbene), making this step irreversible. Subsequently, very
fast C-C bond formation occurs (barrier of only 2.5 kcal/mol, Fig.
1A). The cyclized intermediate may undergo loss of a hydride and
a proton to form the final aromatized product[8b] observed in our
experiments (Scheme 3). The overall mechanism, as deduced
from our computations and in agreement with our experimental
observations, is shown in Fig. 1B.
It can be noted that iridium-carbenes in similar reactions readily
form a furan-type product (Scheme 5), which originates from
intramolecular oxygen attack on the carbene. With iron-carbenes,
we observed furans (5a, 5b) from substrates with electron-rich
aryl groups, however, 1a only provided trace amounts of the
corresponding furan 5c in experiments (Scheme 5). In our
calculations, the barrier for O-C bond formation is 1 kcal/mol
above the barrier for pyridine attack (Fig. 1A). We believe that the
two processes (intramolecular oxygen vs. intermolecular pyridine
attack on the carbene) are in competition and that small changes
in the substrate may result in kinetic preference for one pathway
over the other. For substrate 1a, pyridine attack on the carbene is
kinetically preferred, as supported by both experiment and
computation.
Keywords: Carbenoids • Sulfur ylides • Heterocycles • Iron
catalysis • Indolizines
[1]
a) J. E. Baldwin, R. M. Adlington, C. R. A. Godfrey, D. W. Gollins, J. G.
Vaughan, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1434; b) I. K. Mangion,
I. K. Nwamba, M. Shevlin, M. A. Huffman, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3566; c) I.
K. Mangion, M. Weisel, Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5490; d) J. Vaitla, A.
Bayer, K. H. Hopmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 4277; e) M.
Barday, C. Janot, N. R. Halcovitch, J. Muir, C. Aïssa, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2017, 56, 13117; f) Y. Xu, X. Zhou, G. Zheng, X. Li, Org. Lett. 2017,
19, 5256; g) Y. Xu, X. Yang, X. Zhou, L. Kong, X. Li, Org. Lett. 2017, 19,
4307; h) Y. Xu, G. Zheng, X. Yang, X. Li, Chem. Commun. 2018, 54,
670; i) G. Zheng, M. Tian, Y. Xu, X. Chen, X. Li, Org. Chem. Front. 2018,
5, 998; j) K. S. Halskov, M. R. Witten, G. L. Hoang, B. Q. Mercado, J. A.
Ellman, Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2464; k) X. Wu, H. Xiong, S. Sun, J. Cheng,
Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 1396; l) J. Vaitla, K. H. Hopmann, A. Bayer, Org.
Lett. 2017, 19, 6688.
[2]
[3]
a) C. Molinaro, P. G. Bulger, E. E. Lee, B. Kosjek, S. Lau, D. Gauvreau,
M. E. Howard, D. J. Wallace, P. D. O'Shea, J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77,
2299; b) I. K. Mangion, R. T. Ruck, N. Rivera, M. A. Huffman, M. Shevlin,
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5480; c) F. Wu, Preparation of diazepine derivatives
as β-lactamase inhibitors for treatment of bacterial infection, WO
2017045510 A1.
A. C. B. Burtoloso, R. M. P. Dias, I. A. Leonarczyk, Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2013, 2013, 5005.
[4]
[5]
H. M. L. Davies, R. E. Beckwith, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2861.
R. Oost, J. D. Neuhaus, J. Merad, N. Maulide, Sulfur Ylides in Organic
Synthesis and Transition Metal Catalysis, Structure and Bonding; 2017,
Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1−43.
[6]
[7]
[8]
a) C. Bolm, Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 420; b) S. Enthaler, K. Junge, M. Beller,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3317.
Q.-Q. Cheng, Y. Yu, J. Yedoyan, M. P. Doyle, ChemCatChem 2018, 10,
488.
a) H. M. L. Davies, Curr. Org. Chem. 1998, 2, 463; b) J. Barluenga, G.
Lonzi, L. Riesgo, L. A. Lopez, M. Tomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
13200; c) H. M. L. Davies, Aldrichim. Acta 1997, 30, 107.
M. Jia, S. Ma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9134.
[9]
[10] a) M. J. Gonzalez, J. Gonzalez, L. A. Lopez, R. Vicente, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 12139; b) A. Archambeau, F. Miege, C. Meyer, J.
Cossy, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11540.
In summary, we have reported a novel strategy for the
catalytic generation of iron vinyl carbenoids from sulfoxonium
ylides. The carbene intermediates can be efficiently trapped with
pyridines and amines for the synthesis of heterocycles such as
indolizines, pyrroles, and 3-pyrrolin-2-ones. In situ generation of
S-ylide/Iron-carbenoid/N-ylide followed by annulation sequence
to give a one-pot indolizine further demonstrates the efficiency of
this method in vinyl carbenoid-mediated transformations. Notably,
the present method generates Z-selective vinyl carbenoids from
an inexpensive, low toxic, environmentally benign and air stable
FeBr2 catalyst. The mechanistic studies further disclosed the
nature and reactivity of iron carbenoids generated with FeBr2. We
predict that our findings will open further avenues for the
development of new catalytic transformations using vinyl
sulfoxonium ylides.
[11] a) N. Marion, S. P. Nolan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2750; b) R.
Kazem Shiroodi, V. Gevorgyan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 4991.
[12] a) A. Padwa, Molecules 2000, 6, 1; b) S. Kramer, T. Skrydstrup, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4681; c) X. Huang, B. Peng, M. Luparia, L. F.
Gomes, L. F. Veiros, N. Maulide, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8886.
[13] a) S.-F. Zhu, Q.-L. Zhou, Natl. Sci. Rev. 2014, 1, 580; b) I. Bauer, H. J.
Knölker, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3170.
[14] R. Molyneux, L. James, Science 1982, 216, 190.
[15] C. Kaiser, B. M. Trost, J. Beeson, J. Weinstock, J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30,
3972.
[16] For details, see the Supporting Information.
[17] C. Bailly, Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents 2004, 4, 363.
[18] D. I. Chai, M. Lautens, J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3054.
[19] S. G. Dawande, V. Kanchupalli, J. Kalepu, H. Chennamsetti, B. S. Lad,
S. Katukojvala, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4076.
[20] There is no homocoupling of ylide 1 was observed.
[21] M.-Y. Chang, P.-P. Sun, S.-T. Chen, N.-C. Chang, Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 5271.
Acknowledgements
[22] K. Tonogaki, K. Itami, J. Yoshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1464.
[23] S. F. Zhu, Y. Cai, H. X. Mao, J. H. Xie, Q. L. Zhou, Nat. Chem. 2010, 2,
546.
This work has been performed with support from the Research
Council of Norway (FRINATEK Grant No. 231706 and Centre of
Excellence Grant No. 262695), the Tromsø Research Foundation
(Grant No. TFS2016KHH) and Notur - The Norwegian Metacenter
for Computational Science (CPU Grant No. nn9330k). We also
thank NordForsk (Grant No. 85378)
[24] S. R. Goudreau, A. B. Charette, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15633.
[25] a) J. Tomasi, B. Mennucci, R. Cammi, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999; b)
J. Tomasi, B. Mennucci, E. Cancès, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 1999,
464, 211; c) E. Cancès, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 1997,
107, 3032.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.