1350
T. D. Vickers, B. A. Keay
LETTER
Acknowledgment
We thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of
Canada and the University of Calgary for financial support.
References
(1) (a) Maddaford, S. P.; Andersen, N. G.; Cristofoli, W. A.;
Keay, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10766. (b) Lau,
S. Y. W.; Keay, B. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 181. (c)Lau, S. Y.
W.; Keay, B. A. Synlett 1999, 605. (d) Keay, B. A.;
Maddaford, S. P.; Cristofoli, W. A.; Andersen, N. G.;
Passafaro, M. S.; Wilson, N. S.; Nieman, J. A. Can. J. Chem.
1996, 75, 1163. (e) Cristofoli, W. A.; Keay, B. A. Synlett
1994, 625.
(2) Woo, S.; Keay, B. A. Synlett 1996, 135.
(3) (a) Poli, G.; Giambastiani, G.; Heumann, A. Tetrahedron
2000, 56, 5959. (b) Ikeda, M.; ElBialy, S. A. A.; Yakura, T.
Heterocycles 1999, 51, 1957. (c) Link, J. T.; Overman, L. E.
In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Diederich,
F.; Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH, Inc.: New York NY,
1998, 231. (d) Shibasaki, M.; Boden, C. D. J.; Kojima, A.
Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 7371. (e) Gibson, S. E.; Middleton,
R. J. Contemp. Org. Synth. 1996, 3, 447.
(4) (a) Tomida, B.; Hirose, Y.; Nakatsuka, T. Mokuzai
Gakkaishi 1969, 15, 47. (b) Tomida, B.; Hirose, Y. Mokuzai
Gakkaishi 1969, 15, 337.
(5) Vig, O. P.; Kumar, H.; Salota, J. P.; Sharma, S. D. Indian J.
Chem. 1973, 11, 86.
(6) Paknikar, S. K.; Dinge, A. S. Indian J. Chem. 1980, 19, 80.
(7) Mashrequi, S. H.; Trivedi, G. K. Indian J. Chem. 1978, 16,
849.
(8) Kametani, T.; Kawamura, K.; Tsubuki, M.; Honda, T. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 1305.
(9) Serra, S. Synlett 2000, 890.
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: a) HBF4, Et2O, isoamyl nitrite,
EtOH, 0 °C, 30 min (86%); b) NaI, acetone, reflux, 3 d (71%); c) NaI,
acetone, r.t., 20 h (92%); d) 2 equiv. t-BuLi, Et2O, –78 °C, 1 h; then
10 equiv diethyl oxalate, Et2O, –78 °C, 4 h (52% 2 steps); e) KOH,
H2O, EtOH, reflux, 20 h; 1% HCl, purification at 100 °C, 0.4 mmHg
(64%); f) 6, DCC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, r.t., 20 h (88%); g) Pd2(dba)3,
(+/–)-BINAP, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N2, r.t., 45 min; then add to 4,
pentamethylpiperidine, N,N-dimethylacetamide, argon, 100 °C, 4 d
(90%); h) LiAlH4, Et2O, r.t., 20 h; i) 1 atm H2, 5% Pd/C, EtOH, r.t.,
20 h (86%, 2 steps); j) 2.2 equiv NaH, THF, then add diethylchloro-
phosphate, r.t., 2 h; k) Li(s), NH3(l), Et2O, –78 °C, 30 min (57%, 2
steps).
(10) Purchased from the Aldrich Chemical Company.
(11) (a) Sawaguchi, M.; Fukuhara, T.; Yoneda, N. J. Fluor.
Chem. 1999, 97, 127. (b) Yoneda, N.; Fukuhara, T.;
Mizokami, T.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Lett. 1991, 459.
(12) Cambie, R. C.; Rutledge, P. S.; Smith-Palmer, T.;
Woodgate, P. D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1976, 1161.
(13) Hiranuma, S.; Shibata, M.; Hudlicky, T. J. Org. Chem. 1983,
48, 5321.
(14) (a) Ashimori, A.; Bachand, B.; Overman, L. E.; Poon, D. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6477. (b) Ashimori, A.;
Bachand, B.; Calter, M. A.; Govek, S. P.; Overman, L. E.;
Poon, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6488.
(15) Experimental procedure for the conversion of 4 to 12 and 13:
A mixture of Pd2(dba)3 (13 mg, 0.0141 mmol), (+/–)-BINAP
(17.0 mg, 0.0273 mmol), and dry DMA (2.5 mL) under N2
was added after 45 min. via syringe to a 2 dram screw-top
vial containing ester 4 (52.3 mg, 0.141 mmol). PMP (127
µL, 0.705 mmol)was added and the mixture was heated in
the sealed vial at 100 °C for 4 days. The solution was poured
into ether and washed with saturated NaHCO3 aq (4 × 10
mL) and NaCl aq (4 × 10 mL). The ether extracts were dried
over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered and ether removed under
reduced pressure to give a red/black residue. The oil was
purified by flash chromatography (20:1, hexanes: EtOAc) to
give a mixture1:1 mixture of 12 and 13 (31 mg, 90%). IR
(cm–1) 1814 (ester C=O), 1629 (alkene C=C); 1H NMR δ
1.35 (br s, 3 H, H-1 or H-2), 1.39 (br s, 3 H, H-10 or H-11),
1.43 (br s, 3 H, H-1 or H-2), 1.49 (br s, 3 H, H-10 or H-11),
2.31 (m, 2 H, H-14), 2.38 (br s, 6 H, H-8 and H-17), 2.44 (m,
2 H, H-3), 5.63 (dt, 1 H, J = 10.1 Hz, J = 2.05 Hz, H-12),
5.89–6.08 (m, 2 H, H-4 and H-5), 6.23 (dt, 1 H, J = 10.3 Hz,
J = 4.2 Hz, H-13), 6.87–7.36 (m, 6 H, H-6, H-7, H-9, H-15,
mixtures wherein unreacted SM, 12, 13 and deiodizied 4
were obtained in varying ratios. Changing the time and
temperature of the reaction did not noticeably change the
ratio of 12:13. This was not a worry as the double bond
was not necessary for the synthesis of curcumene ether.
Reduction of the mixture of lactones 12 and 13 with
LiAlH4 followed by a catalytic hydrogenation of a mix-
ture of the isomeric olefins gave saturated diol 14 in 86%
yield. The last step of the synthesis involved removal of
both the hydroxyl and phenol groups simultaneously. This
was accomplished by converting diol 14 into a bis(dieth-
ylphosphonate)17 followed by removal of both phospho-
nates by treatment with lithium metal in liquid ammonia
to give (+/–)-curcumene ether (1) in 57% yield from 14.
In conclusion, we have developed a 9-step synthesis of
(+/–)-curcumene ether (1) from 5-bromo-2-methyl-2-pen-
tene (9) and 2-amino-5-methylphenol (7) in an overall
yield of 7%. We are currently preparing 2-trifluo-
romethanesulfonyloxy-5-methylphenol in order to at-
tempt the intramolecular Heck reaction under asymmetric
conditions.15 Applications of this strategy towards the
synthesis of other 2-arylpyrans are currently underway.
Synlett 2003, No. 9, 1349–1351 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York