Table 2 In situ oxidation-Wittig reaction then hydrolysis to give enals 1a
Reaction Isolated
Entry
i
Alcohol
Product
time/h
yield (%)
17
82
ii
9
80
Scheme 1
iii
iv
v
24
18
17
3.5
33
75
72
79
Wittig homologation–hydrolysis using the conditions reported
herein (4, MTBD, THF), to give good yields of E-enals as
shown in Scheme 1. This is noteworthy as Simoni et al. have
previously reported that enolisable aldehydes do not give good
yields of Wittig products on treatment with phosphonium salts
and guanidine bases, possibly due to competing aldol reac-
tions.8 We presume that phosphorane 3 must be particularly
efficient at trapping aliphatic aldehydes under the conditions
employed in the present study. Aldehydes 610 and 711 are
important flavour and fragrance chemicals,3 emphasizing the
value of this approach.
vi
viic
9
85
In summary, we have designed a practical, and in many cases,
high yielding synthesis of a,b-unsaturated aldehydes from
activated alcohols using an in situ MnO2 oxidation–Wittig
reaction followed by acidic hydrolysis. Work is now underway
to develop a true one-pot sequence in which the hydrolysis step
is carried out without the need for prior removal of the MnO2.
Applications of this methodology in natural product synthesis
are also being explored.
viii
ix
5.5
20
69
81
33
xe
23
We thank the EPSRC for a SOCSA Industrial CASE
studentship.
xi
16
46
43
12
Notes and references
xiif
1 For reviews see W. J. Ebenezer and P. Wight, Comprehensive Organic
Functional Group Transformations, Pergamon, Oxford, 1995, vol. 3,
Ch. 3.02, 53.
2 For recent publications in this area see G. Battistuzzi, S. Cacchi and G.
Fabrizi, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 777; T. Suzuki, T. Makoto and Y.
Wakatsuki, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 7531; P. K. Mahata, O. Barun,
H. Ila and H. Junjappa, Synlett, 2000, 1345; K. C. Nicolaou, Y.-L. Zhang
and P. S. Baran, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 7596 and references
therein.
a Using manganese dioxide (10 equiv.), salt 4 (1.6 equiv.), MTBD (2.3
equiv.) and 4 A mol. sieves under nitrogen in refluxing THF for the
specified time followed by aq. HCl hydrolysis.9 b p-Methoxybenzaldehyde
was also isolated (ca. 50%). c Hydrolysis was unsuccessful-see text. d As a
mixture of isomers. e Refluxing dichloroethane as solvent. f Refluxing
toluene as solvent; hydrolysis was not attempted.
3 D. J. Rowe, Perfumer and Flavorist, 2000, 25, 1.
aldehydes 1a and 1b (entries i and ii). p-Methoxybenzyl alcohol
gave a lower yield of 1c (entry iii), presumably due to the lower
reactivity of p-methoxybenzaldehyde (which constituted the
main by-product of the reaction). We next moved on to
heterocyclic examples (entries iv-vii), and thiophene-3-metha-
nol, furan-2-methanol, and pyridine-3-methanol gave the ex-
pected E-enals 1d–f in good yields. In the case of pyridine-
2-methanol (entry vii), an excellent yield of the intermediate
dioxolane 5g was obtained but, using dilute hydrochloric acid or
Lewis acids, attempts to hydrolyse 5g to the corresponding
unsaturated aldehyde were unsuccessful.
Allylic and propargylic examples were also successful
(entries viii-xi), although the yields were reduced and solvent
optimization was often required. With decanol, however, the
dioxolane 5l was isolated in a paltry 12% yield after refluxing in
toluene for 46 hours (entry xii).
The results in Table 2 demonstrate the broad scope of this
oxidative methodology covering a structurally diverse group of
activated alcohols with many of the yields obtained being
comparable, or indeed better, than previously published homo-
logation reactions starting from the corresponding aldehydes.
Although decanol did not react efficiently using this
methodology, we have found that aliphatic aldehydes undergo
4 S. Trippett and D. M. Walker, J. Chem. Soc., 1961, 1266. For use in total
synthesis see R. Zamboni and J. Rokach, Tetrahedron Lett., 1982, 23,
4751; W. C. Still, C. Gennari, J. A. Noguez and D. A. Pearson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 260.
5 T. M. Cresp, M. V. Sargent and P. Vogel, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1, 1974, 37. See also H. J. Bestmann, K. Roth and M. Ettlinger, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1979, 18, 687.
6 (a) X. Wei and R. J. K. Taylor, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 3815; (b)
L. Blackburn, X. Wei and R. J. K. Taylor, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1337;
(c) X. Wei and R. J. K. Taylor, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 616; (d) L.
Blackburn, C. Pei and R. J. K. Taylor, Synlett, 2002, 215; (e) K. A
Runcie and R. J. K. Taylor, Chem. Commun., 2002, 974; (f) L.
Blackburn, H. Kanno and R. J. K. Taylor, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44,
115.
7 L. Blackburn and R. J. K. Taylor, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 1637; H. Kanno
and R. J. K. Taylor, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 7337; H. Kanno and R.
J. K. Taylor, Synlett, 2002, 1287; G. D. McAllister, C. D. Wilfred and
R. J. K. Taylor, Synlett, 2002, 1291; J. S. Foot, H. Kanno, G. M. P.
Giblin and R. J. K. Taylor, Synlett, 2002, 1293.
8 D. Simoni, M. Rossi, R. Rondanin, A. Mazzani, R. Baruchello, C.
Malagutti, M. Roberti and F. P. Indiviata, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 3766.
9 Known products gave data consistent with those published; novel
compounds were fully characterised.
10 K. Anjou and E. von Sydow, Acta Chem. Scand., 1967, 21, 945.
11 E. Elkik, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1968, 283.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2284–2285
2285