10.1002/anie.201901591
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
contrast, pathway C refers to a concerted [2+2] process. This
mechanism is conventionally proposed for ketene-olefin [2+2]
reactions.[20] In the literatures, both computational and
experimental studies suggest that ketene-imine [2+2] reaction
favors path A.[3,21] The [2+2] reaction between imines and
keteniminium cations was reported to proceed in a similar
way.[22] Some previous report of ketenimine-imine [2+2] reaction
support path A as well, albeit without convincible experimental
In summary, we have reported an approach toward
difluoroketimine through the reaction of difluorocarbene with
isocyanide. An efficient synthesis of α,α-difluoro-β-amino amides
and α,α-difluoroazetidinimines have been developed based on
the [2+2] reaction of imines and the in situ generated
difluoroketenimine. Mechanistic studies have substantiated the
existence of difluoroketenimine intermediate and revealed an
unusual stepwise mechanism of [2+2] reaction.
t
evidence.[16] However, we envision that Ms of the imine and Bu
substituent of the nitrile moiety might stabilize the negative and
positive charges in the zwitterion generated in pathway B,
respectively, making pathway B plausible.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to National Basic Research Program of China
(973 Program, No. 2015CB856600) and Natural Science
Foundation of China (21871010) for the financial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: carbene · fluorine · difluoroketenimine · [2+2]
reaction · -amino amide
[1]
a) G. Cardillo, C. Tomasini, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 25, 117-128; b) E.
Juaristi, Ed. Enantioselective synthesis of -amino acids; Wiley-VCH:
New York, 1997; c) Seebach, D.; Matthews, J. L. Chem. Commun.
1997, 2015-2022; c) Gellmann, S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 173-
180.
Scheme 5. Proposed pathways for [2+2] cycloaddition.
[2]
a) H. Staudinger, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1907, 356, 51-123; b) C.
Palomo, J. M. Aizpurua, I. Canboa, M. Oiarbide, Eur. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 3223-3235; c) C. Palomo, J. M. Aizpurua, I. Ganboa, M. Oiarbide,
Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 1837-1872; d) N. Fu, T. T. Tidwell,
Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 10465-10496; e) C. R. Pitts, T. Lectka, Chem.
To differentiate the possible pathways, the electronic effects
of the substituents on the imines were evaluated with Hammett
linear free-energy relationship (Scheme 6). Path A and B are
expected to show opposite electronic effects of the substituents
on the imines. An electron-donating substituent should facilitate
the reaction if path A operates but hamper the reaction if it
follows path B. In the case of path C, no significant electronic
effects are expected due to the concerted nature of the reaction.
Thus, the reactions were quenched after 10 min to ensure
Rev. 2014, 114,
7930-7953.
[3]
[4]
F. P. Cossio, A. Arrieta, M. A. Sierra, Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 925-
936.
a) J. Wang, M. Sánchez-Rosello, J. L. Aceña, C. del Pozo, A. E.
Sorochinsky, S. Fustero, V. A. Soloshonok, H. Liu, Chem. Rev. 2014,
114, 2432-2506; b) R. Berger, G. Resnati, P. Metrangolo, E. Weber, J.
Hulliger, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3496-3508; c) S. Purser, P. R.
Moore, S. Swallow, V. Gouverneur, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320-
330.
a) R. Joyeau, H. Molines, R. Labia, M. Wakselman, J. Med. Chem.
1988, 31, 370-374; b) I. Vergely, N. Boggetto, V. Okochi, S.
Golpayegani, M. Reboud-Ravaux, R. Kobaiter, R. Joyeau, M.
Wakselman, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 30, 199-208; c) K. Mikami, S.
Fustero, M. Sánchez-Roselló, J. L. Aceña, V. Soloshonok, A.
Sorochinsky, Synthesis 2011, 19, 3045- 3079.
a) N. Boyer, P. Gloanec, G. De Nanteuil, P. Jubault, J. -C. Quirion, Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4277-4295; b) A. Tarui, K. Sato, M. Omote, I.
Kumadaki, A. Ando, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2733-2744; c) W. J.
Chung, M. Omote, J. T. Welch, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7784-7787; d)
M. Bordeau, F. Frébault, M. Gobet, J. -P. Picard, Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 4147-4154; e) M. D. Kosobokov, A. D. Dilman, V. V. Levin, M. I.
Struchkova, J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 5850-5855.
a) D. C. England, C. G. Krespan, J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 816-819; b)
M. H. Habibi, J. Fluorine Chem. 1987, 37, 177-181; c) W. R. Dolbier Jr.,
S. K. Lee, O. Phanstiel IV, Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 2065-2072.
J. G. Cordaro, H. van Halbeek, R. G. Bergman, Angew. Chem. 2004,
116, 6526-6529; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6366-6396.
Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 1621-1630.
[5]
[6]
conversion of no more than 10%. Yields were determined by 19
F
NMR using trifluorotoluene as the internal standard. Analysis of
the relative rate constants with substituent constants afforded
good correlation (Scheme 6). The obtained reaction constant ρ
with significant positive value of 1.05 suggests the build-up of
negative charge close to the imine part in the process of the
nucleophilic addition, which is consistent with path B. To the
best of our knowledge, this is the first example of stepwise
mechanism of ketenimine [2+2] reaction initiated by nucleophilic
attack of terminal carbon of ketenimines.
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10] Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, L. Ling, Y. Li, Y. Dong, M. Gong, X. Zhao, Y. Zhang, J.
Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 4330-4341.
[11] C. Ni, J. Hu, Synthesis 2014, 46, 842-863.
[12] a) M. Hu, C. Ni, L. Li, Y. Han, J. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137,
14496-14501; b) Z. Zhang, W. Yu, C. Wu, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Wang,
Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 281-285; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55,
273-277; c) J. Zheng, J. -H. Lin, L. -Y. Yu, Y. Wei, X. Zheng, J. -C. Xiao,
Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 6150-6153.
Scheme 6. Evaluation of electronic effects with Hammett linear free energy
correlation.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.