Scheme 4. Completion of the Aromatic Fragmenta
Scheme 5. Synthesis of the C9-C16 Fragmenta
a Reagents and conditions: (a) (S,S)-Co(salen), AcOH, H2O,
THF, 50% conversion, 47%. (b) TBSCl, imidazole, THF, 0 °C,
96%. (c) Me3OBF4, 4 Å MS, proton sponge, CH2Cl2, 96%. (d) H2,
Pd/C, MeOH, quant. (e) EtOCOCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2, -20 °C then
NH3 gas 91%. (f) 9 (1.0 equiv), 20 mol % CuI, 40 mol % N,N′-
dimethylethylenediamine, K2CO3, toluene, 110 °C, 82%.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) Cy2BOTf, Et3N, CH2Cl2 -78 °C
then CHOCH2CH2OTBS, -78 °C to room temperature, 94%, dr
> 30:1. (b) TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 96%. (c) Me(MeO)NH‚
THF) allowed for the methylation of the secondary hydroxyl
group with Meerwein’s reagent in excellent overall yield
(92% over two steps). Subsequent debenzylation of the ester
20 by hydrogenolysis followed by amidation in a two-step,
one-pot procedure via a mixed anhydride provided the
desired amide 10 in good yield.
i
HCl, PrMgCl, THF, -20 to 5 °C, 87%. (d) DibalH, THF, -78
°C. (e) 11, THF, -78 °C, 73% (two steps), dr ) 6.5:1. (f) TIPSOTf,
2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 98%. (g) DDQ, CH2Cl2/H2O (10/1), 0 °C,
94%. (h) I2, PPh3, imidazole, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 88%.
To undertake the assembly of the aromatic fragment 7, a
copper-mediated amidation between aryl bromide 9 and
amide 10 was investigated. After screening several reaction
conditions,11 it was determined that this coupling was best
effected using 20 mol % CuI, 40 mol % N,N′-dimethyl-
ethylenediamine, and potassium carbonate as a base in
toluene at 110 °C and using a slight excess (1.2 equiv) of
the amide 10. Under these conditions, amidation product 7
was obtained in 84% yield. Moreover, we found that a 1:1
ratio of bromide 9 and amide 10 did not significantly
decrease the yield of this reaction since the aromatic fragment
could be obtained in 82% yield and in multigram quantities.
The synthesis of the C9-C16 fragment is outlined in
Scheme 5. anti-Aldol condensation of 2112 with tert-
butyldimethylsilyloxypropionaldehyde furnished aldol adduct
22 as a single diastereoisomer (94% yield). Protection of
the resulting alcohol as a TBS ether (TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine,
CH2Cl2) followed by removal of the chiral auxiliary afforded
the Weinreb amide 23. This last step proved to be quite
challenging and required harsh conditions: while most
common methods14 failed to efficiently cleave the bulky
auxiliary, we found after considerable experimentation that
exposure of 22 to 10 equiv of Me(MeO)NMgCl15 from -20
to 5 °C gave the desired amide 23 in 87% yield. Conversion
of amide 23 to C9-C16 fragment 8 entailed installation of
the C13 stereocenter and the trisubstituted (Z)-olefin. To this
end, amide 23 was reduced to aldehyde 12 using DibalH in
THF. Subsequent treatment of 12 at -78 °C with vinyl-
lithium 11 provided the secondary alcohol 24 with a good
overall yield (73% over two steps) and reasonable selectivity
(Felkin:anti-Felkin ) 6.5:1). The stereochemical outcome
of this reaction can be rationalized using a Felkin-Ahn
model, and the stereochemistry at C13 was unambiguously
assigned using 13C NMR chemical shift analysis of the
acetonide derived from the 1,3-diol.16 The completion of 8
was effected by protection of the emerged alcohol as its
triisopropylsilyl ether, DDQ deprotection of the PMB ether,
and conversion of the allylic alcohol to the iodide using a
buffered solution of triphenylphosphine and iodine, which
afforded the C9-C16 fragment 8 in 81% yield over the last
three steps.
As previously reported,7-9 union of fragments 7 and 8 was
effected by alkylation of the sulfone 7 with the iodide 8
(Scheme 6). Deprotonation of the latter with LiHMDS in
THF at -78 °C followed by addition of 8 gave a coupling
product, which was subjected to treatment with sodium
mercury amalgam in buffered methanol, providing the
desulfonylated intermediate 25.
At this stage, we initiated the construction of the key (E,E)-
bis-1,3-diene for macrocyclization by RCM. To prevent any
complications due to cyclization of the amide to an N-
acylhemiaminal in a subsequent step, the amide was protected
as a 2,2,2-trichloroethylaminal, as previously discussed by
(14) (a) Levin, J. I.; Turos, E.; Weinreb, S. M. Synth. Commun. 1982,
12, 989-993. (b) Shimizu, T.; Osako, K.; Nakata, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 2685-2688. (c) Huang, P. Q.; Zheng, X.; Deng, X. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 9039-9041.
(15) Williams, J. M.; Jobson, R. B.; Yasuda, N.; Marchesini, G.; Dolling,
U. H.; Grabowski, E. J. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5461-5464.
(16) Evans, D. A.; Rieger, D. L.; Gage, J. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,
31, 7099-7100.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 4, 2004
527