J. Lee et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 2291–2297
2297
18. (a) Wahl, P.; Foged, C.; Tullin, S.; Thomsen, C. Mol.
Pharmacol. 2001, 59, 9; (b) Seabrook, G. R.; Sutton,
K. G.; Jarolimek, W.; Hollingworth, G. J.; Teague, S.;
Webb, J.; Clark, N.; Boyce, S.; Kerby, J.; Ali, Z.; Chou,
M.; Middleton, R.; Kaczorowski, G.; Jones, A. B.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303, 1052.
19. Garcia-Martinez, C.; Humet, M.; Planells-Cases, R.;
Gomis, A.; Caprini, M.; Viana, F.; De le Pena, E.;
Sanchez-Baeza, F.; Carbonell, T.; De Felipe, C.; Perez-
Paya, E.; Belmonte, C.; Messeguer, A.; Ferrer-Montiel, A.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 2374.
Beheshti, M.; Szabo, T.; Blumberg, P. M. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2001, 9, 19.
30. Rama Rao, A. V.; Gurjar, M. K.; Lakshmipathi, P.;
Reddy, M. M.; Nagarajan, M.; Pal, S.; Sarma, B. V. N. B.
S.; Tripathy, N. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7433.
31. Lee, J.; Lee, J.; Szabo, T.; Gonzalez, A. F.; Welter, J. D.;
Blumberg, P. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 1713.
32. Mitsuya, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Kawakamin, K.; Satoh, A.;
Ogino, Y.; Kakikawa, T.; Ohtake, N.; Kimura, T.; Hirose,
H.; Sato, A.; Numazawa, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Noguchi, K.;
Mase, T. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 5017.
20. Himmel, H. M.; Kiss, T.; Borvendeg, S. J.; Gillen, C.;
Illes, P. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003, 301, 981.
21. Rami, H. K.; Davis, J. B.; Davies, C. H.; Egerton, J.;
Gunthorpe, M. J.; Hadley, M. S.; Jerman, J. C.; Randall,
A. D.; Smart, D.; Smith, G. D.; Soffin, E. M.; Thompson,
S. M.; Wyman, P. A. Drugs Fut. 2002, 27(Suppl. A), 411.
22. PCT WO 03/014064.
23. (a) Sun, Q.; Tafesse, L.; Islam, K.; Zhou, X.; Victory,
S. F.; Zhang, C.; Hachicha, M.; Schmid, L. A.; Patel, A.;
Rotshteyn, Y.; Valenzano, K. J.; Kyle, D. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 3611; (b) Valenzano, K. J.; Grant,
E. R.; Wu, G.; Hachicha, M.; Schmid, L.; Tafesse, L.;
Sun, Q.; Rotshteyn, Y.; Francis, J.; Limberis, J.; Malik, S.;
Wittemore, E. R.; Hodges, D. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
2003, 306, 377; Pomonis, J. D.; Harrison, J. E.; Mark, L.;
Bristol, D. R.; Valenzano, K. J.; Walker, K. J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 2003, 306, 387.
24. Appendino, G.; Harrison, S.; De Petrocellis, L.; Daddario,
N.; Bianchi, F.; Moriello, A. S.; Trevisani, M.; Benvenuti,
F.; Geppetti, P.; Di Marzo, V. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 139,
1417.
25. (a) Park, H.-G.; Park, M.-K.; Choi, J.-Y.; Choi, S.-H.;
Lee, J.; Suh, Y.-G.; Oh, U.; Lee, J.; Kim, H.-D.; Park,
Y.-H.; Jeong, Y. S.; Choi, J. K.; Jew, S.-S. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 197; (b) Park, H.-G.; Park, M.-K.;
Choi, J.-Y.; Choi, S.-H.; Lee, J.; Suh, Y.-G.; Oh, U.;
Lee, J.; Kim, H.-D.; Park, Y.-H.; Jeong, Y.-S.; Choi,
J.-K.; Jew, S.-S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13,
601.
26. Yoon, J.; Choi, H.; Lee, H. J.; Ryu, C. H.; Park, H.-G.;
Suh, Y.-G.; Oh, U.; Jeong, Y. S.; Choi, J. K.; Park, Y.-H.;
Kim, H.-D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1549.
27. Lee, J.; Lee, J.; Kang, M.; Shin, M.-Y.; Kim, J.-M.;
Kang, S.-U.; Lim, J.-O.; Choi, H.-K.; Suh, Y.-G.; Park,
H.-G.; Oh, U.; Kim, H.-D.; Park, Y.-H.; Ha, H.-J.; Kim,
Y.-H.; Toth, A.; Wang, Y.; Tran, R.; Pearce, L. V.;
Lundberg, D. J.; Blumberg, P. M. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
3116.
28. Wang, Y.; Toth, A.; Tran, R.; Szabo, T.; Welter, J. D.;
Blumberg, P. M.; Lee, J.; Kang, S.-U.; Lim, J.-O.; Lee, J.
Mol. Pharm. 2003, 64, 325.
29. Lee, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, S. Y.; Chun, M. W.; Cho,
H.; Hwang, S. W.; Oh, U.; Park, Y. H.; Marquez, V. E.;
33. Gallacher, G.; Smith, C. Z.; Hawkes, G. E. Biog. Amines
1995, 11, 49.
34. Receptor binding affinities were assessed in terms of the
ability of the compounds to compete with specific
[3H]RTX binding in the CHO/VR1 system and were
expressed as Ki SEM. Potencies as agonists were
expressed as EC50 SEM, and absolute levels of 45Ca2þ
uptake were compared with that induced by a maximally
effective concentration of capsaicin in this system
(300 nM). The in vitro antagonisticpotenices of the
compounds were evaluated by measuring antagonism of
the 45Ca2þ uptake induced by 50 nM capsaicin and
expressed as the IC50 SEM, respectively, correcting for
competition by capsaicin. All Ki and EC50 values represent
the mean of at least three experiments. Levels of partial
agonism are from one to four experiments.
35. Wang, Y.; Szabo, T.; Welter, J. D.; Toth, A.; Tran, R.;
Lee, J.; Kang, S. U.; Lee, Y.-S.; Min, K. H.; Suh, Y.-G.;
Park, M.-K.; Park, H.-G.; Park, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-D.; Oh,
U.; Blumberg, P. M.; Lee, J. (erratum published in Mol.
Pharmacol. 2003, 63, 589) Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 62, 947.
36. Experimental protocols involving animals in this study
were reviewed by the Animal Care and Use Committee of
Digital Biotech Co., according to the NIH guidelines
(NIH publication number 85-23, revised 1985) of ÔPrinci-
ples of Laboratory Animal CareÕ.
37. Since 1 and 12 are structurally related, we have studied
whether 1 may be generated after the systemicadminis-
tration of 12. Thus, 5 mg/kg of 12 was administered
intravenously to male Sprague–Dawley rats (250–280 g)
and 0.25 mL of blood was collected at various times up to
120 min. Plasma was collected and an aliquot (0.15 mL)
was deproteinated by the addition of 0.3 mL acetonitrile.
An aliquot of the supernatant (0.35 mL) was evaporated to
dryness under a stream of nitrogen and the residue was
reconstituted by the addition of 0.1 mL of mobile phase
(water/methanol/acetonitrile ¼ 20:40:40). An aliquot of the
mixture was injected directly onto the LC–MS system.
Although both 1 and 12 could be readily quantified by the
LC–MS system, the concentration of 12, but not 1, was
detected in the sample. Since we could not have detected
any conversion of 12 into 1, we conclude that the action of
12 cannot be explained by its conversion to 1 in vivo.