Fig. 2 Effect of antioxidant concentration on current augmentation of PC12
cells with AbP(1–40). The plot shows the preventive effect of different
concentrations of antioxidants. The lower dashed line indicates current
density in control cells, whilst the upper dashed line represents currents
Fig. 1 Correlation between Epa and % zinc transfer from MT (experimental
details given in legend of Table 1). A value for the maximum zinc release
was obtained by incubation with 10 mM ebselen. The value for zinc release
after 60 min was expressed as a percentage of the maximum zinc release and
plotted as a function of the catalyst’s (separately determined) oxidation
potential. Experiments were repeated (N = 3) and error bars (SD) applied
for zinc release as well as Epa.
observed following 24 h incubation with 100 nM AbP(1–40).
~ 20 nM). The diselenide 4 was also found to be highly active
in cell culture, albeit considerably less active than 10, in line
with its higher oxidation potential (+ 1000 mV) and lower
bioassay activity (EC50 ~ 160 nM). In accordance with a high
oxidation potential (Epa = +1155 mV) the commonly studied
Se-compound selenocystamine proved rather inactive (EC50
~ 10 mM).
chalcogen in vivo Epa has the potential to be used as a predictor
of biological activity.
These experiments have demonstrated that antioxidants
selected on the basis of electrochemical redox-behaviour and
their activity in bioassays are also likely to be highly active in
cell cultures. Compound 10 exhibited the lowest Epa and the
most promising antioxidant activity in the in vitro bioassays. It
also showed a remarkable activity when compared to ebselen
and melatonin in cell culture while showing little cell toxicity,
demonstrating that this compound is among the best anti-
oxidants available to date in cultured cells mimicking Alzhei-
mer’s disease. It is expected that this combination of chalcogen-
electrochemistry with organoselenide and organotelluride
catalysts will provide a new methodology for innovative
antioxidant research in Alzheimer’s disease.
Organochalcogens were evaluated for GPx-like activity via
their ability to catalyse the reaction of tert-butyl hydrogen
peroxide (t-BuOOH) with the thiol protein metallothionein
(MT) (this redox assay is increasingly used since it provides
excellent reproducibility).10,11 Zinc release from MT occurs
upon oxidation of the thiol ligands and is detected spec-
trophotometrically in the presence of the chromophoric dye
4-(2-pyridylazo)resorcinol (PAR). Agents catalysing this proc-
ess can be evaluated according to both the initial rate and the
total extent of zinc release. Maximum zinc release from 0.5 mM
MT was calculated by incubation with 10 mM ebselen
(2-phenyl-1,2-benzisoselenazol-3[2H]-one) and the amount of
zinc release for different antioxidants compared to this
theoretical maximum.11 Table 1 and Fig. 1 indicate that Epa
correlated well with the activity in the bioassay, with the lowest
potentials associated with the highest activity. A similar
correlation was observed in a standard GPx assay monitoring
thiophenol oxidation by hydrogen peroxide in methanol (data
not shown).12 Among the agents tested, 10 had the lowest Epa
and also one of the highest activities. It was therefore tested in
PC12 cell culture indicative of Alzheimer’s disease and
compared with other antioxidants.
This work was financially supported by the EPSRC (GR/
N22007), the MRC, an Alzheimer’s Society Innovation Grant,
the Wellcome Trust, the Royal Society and the University of
Exeter.
Notes and references
1 L. M. Sayre, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 1999, 4, 220.
2 M. Miki, Methods Enzymol., 1994, 234, 542.
3 G. Mugesh and H. B. Singh, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2000, 29, 347; G. I. Giles,
K. M. Tasker and C. Jacob, Free Radic. Biol. Med., 2001, 31, 1279.
4 L. Engman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 9737.
5 K. M. Vessman, M. Ekstrom, M. Berglund and C.-M. Andersson, J.
Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 4461.
6 L. Engman, J. Persson, C. M. Andersson and M. Berglund, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1992, 1309; I. A. Cotgreave, P. Moldeus, L.
Engman and A. Hallberg, Biochem. Pharmacol., 1991, 42, 1481; L.
Engman, D. Stern, H. Frisel, K. Vessman, M. Berglund, E. Bengt and
C.-M. Andersson, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1995, 3, 1255; C.-M. Anders-
son, A. Hallberg, M. Linden, R. Brattsand, P. Moldeus and I. Cotgreave,
Free Radical Biol. Med., 1994, 16, 17.
7 J. Ludvík and B. Nygård, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1997, 423, 1.
8 H. Suzuki and T. Nakamura, Synthesis, 1992, 6, 549; L. Engman and J.
Persson, J. Organomet. Chem., 1990, 388, 71; L. Engman and J.
Persson, Synth. Commun., 1993, 23, 445.
PC12 cells were cultured as previously described.13,14 24 h
prior to study aliquots were exposed to 100 nM amyloid beta
peptide (residues 1–40) (AbP(1–40)) and varying concentrations
of antioxidants. AbP(1–40) causes dramatic and selective en-
hancement of Ca2+ channel activity in these cells via a
mechanism which involves increased production of ROS.13,14
Ca2+ channel currents were recorded using the whole-cell patch
clamp technique, with 20 mM Ba2+ as charge carrier. Currents
were evoked by applying 200 ms ramps (2100 mV to +100mV,
0.2 Hz) from 280 mV holding potential, measured at the peak
of the current–voltage relationship (+20 mV) and corrected for
cell size to yield current densities (pA/pF, means sem).14 Cell
viability was determined using a standard 3-(4,5-dimethylth-
iazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and
at this dose of AbP(1–40) does not result in cell kill. The
antioxidants tested reversed the current augmentation induced
by AbP(1–40) without any detectable loss of cell viability (Fig.
2). The naturally occurring antioxidant melatonin exhibited the
least potency (EC50 ~ 30 mM), whereas the commonly used
selenium based anti-inflammatory agent ebselen (Epa deter-
mined as +1044 mV) showed increased potency (EC50 ~ 1 mM).
In line with a variation in Epa of approximately 700 mV,
compound 10 by far exceeded the activity of ebselen and,
astonishingly, was active in nanomolar concentrations (EC50
9 B. Svensmark and O. Hammerich, in Organic Electrochemistry, eds. H.
Lund and M. M. Baizer, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 3rd edn., 1991,
p. 659.
10 C. Jacob, W. Maret and B. L. Vallee, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,
1999, 96, 1910.
11 C. Jacob, G. E. Arteel, T. Kanda, L. Engman and H. Sies, Chem. Res.
Toxicol., 2000, 13, 3; C. Jacob, W. Maret and B. L. Vallee, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun., 1998, 248, 569.
12 M. Iwaoka and S. Tomoda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 2557.
13 S. C. Taylor, T. F. C. Batten and C. Peers, J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 274,
31217.
14 K. N. Green and C. Peers, J. Neurochem., 2001, 77, 953.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2490–2491
2491