1648
J. G. Varnes et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 1645–1649
The 3-benzylpiperidines and their analogues were
prepared according to Scheme 1, which depicts the pre-
paration 3-benzylpiperidin-1-yl-n-propylureas from com-
mercially available 3-hydroxypiperidine hydrochloride
(46, Scheme 1). Protection of the piperidine nitrogen
with Boc2O and oxidation with tetrapropylammonium
perruthenate (TPAP)11 afforded the 3-piperidone tert-
butyl carbamic acid (47). A Wittig reaction between 47
and an appropriately substituted benzyltriphenylphos-
phonium bromide resulted in olefin 48; reduction then
gave racemic Boc-protected benzylpiperidine 49. Chiral
3-(4-fluorobenzyl)-piperidines were prepared upon chiral
resolution of 49.
antagonists with binding affinities under 5 nM. This was
accomplished by replacing the 4-(4-fluorobenzyl)piper-
idine of our molecules with a 3-(4-fluorobenzyl)piper-
idine discovered in an effort to improve selectivity for
the CCR3 receptor. Further improvements in binding
were found by substituting the 5-position of the 3-(1-
Me-tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl urea of these molecules with
small polar functional groups. This resulted in a CCR3
antagonist with a binding IC50 and in vitro EC50 bind-
ing data for calcium mobilization and eotaxin chemo-
taxis assays in the mid to high picomolar range. Having
demonstrated that our compounds are functional
antagonists of the CCR3 receptor, we have focused on
determining the in vivo efficacy of these molecules, the
results of which will be reported in a future publication.
Deprotection of 49 under acid conditions and reductive
amination with Boc-protected 3-aminopropanal (52)
and sodium triacetoxyborohydride was followed by
acid-mediated cleavage of the resulting Boc-carbamate
to give hydrochloride 53. Urea 54 was obtained by
reacting 53 with commercially available 3-substituted
phenyl isocyanates in the presence of triethylamine.
Where the desired 3-substituted phenyl isocyanates were
not commercially available, the corresponding phenolic
carbamates were prepared from the appropriately sub-
stituted aniline (C6H5OCOCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 90%) and
used instead.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the help of A. J. Mical, K.
A. Rathgeb, D.-R., Wu, and N. C. Caputo, of the
Separations Group; M. X. Xia, G. A. Cain, and C.
Teleha, of the Chemical Synthesis Group; and T. H.
Scholz and G. A. Nemeth of the Spectroscopy Group.
References and notes
The 3-phenethylpiperidines were prepared by substituting
phenethyltriphenylphosphonium bromide12 for benzyl-
triphenylphosphonium bromide in Scheme 1. The 2-
benzylmorpholines were prepared according to the
procedure of Brown et al.13 Piperazine 20 was prepared
from commercially available 2-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-
3-(4-fluorophenyl)propionic acid using the procedure of
Hendrix et al.14 The strategies for preparing compounds
21–28 have been previously reported.15 The 3-tetra-
zolephenyl ureas were prepared from the corresponding
benzoic acid.16 Ureas 31 and 33 were prepared from
phenolic carbamates derived from commercially avail-
able nitro benzenes. Imidazole 32 was prepared from
commercially available 1-bromo-3-nitrobenzene.17
1. Asthma; Barnes, P. J., Grunstein, M. M., Leff, A. R.,
Woolcock, A. J., Eds.; Vol. 1; Lippincott-Raven Publish-
ers: New York, 1997.
2. Ramshaw, H. S.; Woodcock, J. M.; Bagley, C. J.;
McClure, B. J.; Hercus, T. R.; Lopez, A. F. Immunol. Cell
Biol. 2001, 79, 154.
3. Egan, R. W.; Umland, S. P.; Cuss, F. M.; Chapman,
R. W. Allergy 1996, 51, 71.
4. Kitaura, M.; Nakajima, T.; Imai, T.; Harada, S.; Com-
badiere, C.; Tiffany, H. L.; Murphy, P. M.; Yoshie, O. J.
Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 7725.
5. Heath, H.; Qin, S.; Rao, P.; Wu, L.; LaRosa, G.; Kassam,
N.; Ponath, P. D.; Mackay, C. R. J. Clin. Invest. 1997, 99,
178.
6. Hogan, S. P.; Mishra, A.; Brandt, E. B.; Royalty, M. P.;
Pope, S. M.; Zimmermann, N.; Foster, P. S.; Rothenberg,
M. E. J. Immunol. 2001, 2, 353.
In conclusion, we have taken potent non-selective 4-
benzylpiperidines (5–6) and prepared selective CCR3
7. Wacker, D. A.; Santella, J. B., III; Gardner, D. S.;
Varnes, J. G.; Estrella, M.; DeLucca, G. V.; Ko, S. S.;
Tanabe, K.; Watson, P. S.; Welch, P. K.; Covington, M.;
Stowell, N. C.; Wadman, E. A.; Davies, P.; Solomon,
K. A.; Newton, R. C.; Trainor, G. L.; Friedman, S. M.;
Decicco, C. P.; Duncia, J. V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2002, 12, 1785.
8. De Lucca, G. V.; Kim, Ui. T.; Johnson, C.; Vargo, B. J.;
Welch, P. K.; Covington, M.; Davies, P.; Solomon, K. A.;
Newton, R. C.; Trainor, G. L.; Decicco, C. P.; Ko, S. S. J.
Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3794.
9. The binding assay was carried out using 150 pM 125I
labeled human eotaxin, 5Â105 CHO cells, and 0.0001–1
mM compound in 150 mL of binding buffer (0.5% bovine
serum albumen, 10 mM HEPES buffer and 5 mM mag-
nesium chloride in RPMI 1640 media) in 96-well filtration
plates (Millipore) pretreated with 5 mg/mL protamine in
phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.2. The assay was incu-
bated at room temperature for 30 min. The plates were
vacuum filtered and the remaining cells were washed three
times with binding buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl added.
Scheme 1. (a) Boc2O, NaHCO3, THF, 14 h, 90%; (b) TPAP, NMO,
CH2Cl2/CH3CN, 4A MS, 1 h, 60–80%; (c) R-C6H4CH2P+Ph3BrÀ, n-
˚
BuLi, THF, À78 ꢁC, 6–8 h, 60–70%; (d) H2 (40 psi), Pd/C, MeOH, 12
h, quant; (e) 4M HCl, diox, 3 h, quant.; (f) 52, NaBH(OAc)3,
ClCH2CH2Cl, 14 h, 80%; (g) 3-R1-5-R2-C6H4NCO, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 5
min, 60–85%; (h) 3-R1-5-R2-C6H4NHC(O)OC6H5, CH3CN, 50 ꢁC,
1 h, 55–85%.