4694 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 61, No. 14, 1996
Wang and Gokel
assess cation binding.12 The importance of this develop-
ing technique is clear from recent reports of J ohnstone
et al.,13 Dearden et al.,14 Brodbelt et al.,15 Bowers,16 and
others.17 We used this method to probe the binding
properties of organometallic ligands.18 In order to assess
whether corresponding results were obtained in solution
and gas phase studies using the FAB-MS technique, we
surveyed a series of 22 crown and lariat ethers.19 It
proved possible in this case to correlate binding constants
determined in the solution phase with peak intensities
observed by FAB-MS. The relationship of binding
strengths determined in solution and the gas phase by
this method was “semi-quantitative” but the technique
is of obvious value. Based in part upon this success, we
extended studies to the compounds described below.
Com p ou n d Syn th eses. Three compounds were re-
quired for the present study. 18-Crown-6, 1, was pre-
pared by the method described in Organic Syntheses.20
Three-ring macrocycle 2 was prepared by the procedure
recently detailed.3a Two-ring ligand 3 was prepared by
the reaction of R,R′-dibromo-p-xylene with 2 equiv of aza-
18-crown-6 by a modification of the procedure reported
by Sutherland and co-workers.21 The structures of
compounds 1-3 are shown.
nable to the study of molecular complexation because it
involves desorption of the substance(s) under study by
low level energy transfer from accelerated atoms that
bombard the sample probe. Electrospray ionization is
an even “softer” method for desorption, and very little
molecular fragmentation is observed when this technique
is used. Like FAB, ESI can be used to detect noncovalent
interactions, but its “sensitivity” to such complexes is,
in principle at least, greater. Moreover, a volatile solvent
such as methanol or chloroform is amenable to ESI-MS
whereas a less volatile matrix (commonly m-nitrobenzyl
alcohol) is normally used in FAB-MS. The experiments
described here were undertaken on a Finnigan mass
spectrometer having an electrospray interface. Details
of the electrospray ion source have been reported previ-
ously.22
18-Cr ow n -6 Com p lexa tion . One of the most exten-
sively studied cation-complexing agents is 18-crown-6 (1),
which binds a large array of metallic and organic ions.
We used this host as a control compound to explore multi-
crown ether cation binding. Sodium and potassium
cations were used in this “calibration” study. In both
cases, chloride was the counteranion.
The equilibrium constant for the reaction of 18-crown-6
with sodium cation in methanol is 104.35 (log10 KS ) 4.35)
and 106.08 for 18-crown-6 with potassium cation.23 The
binding constant ratio [KS (K+)/KS (Na+)] is 54. Direct
use of the relative mass peak intensities to assess the
18-crown-6 binding selectivity of K+ over Na+ presents
an obvious problem. If the two cations were present in
solution in equimolar concentrations and peak intensity
quantitatively corresponds to cation binding strength, the
ESI-MS peak intensity for [1‚K]+ would be 50-fold that
of [1‚Na]+. The 50:1 peak ratio would introduce consid-
erable error since the low peak intensity measurement
for the latter would be inherently inaccurate. Therefore,
a solution was used that contained a higher concentration
ratio of Na+ over K+.
For the present study, four anhydrous methanol solu-
tions were prepared in which [K+] ) 20 µM and [Na+]
was varied so that [Na+]/[K+] (as the chlorides) ) 5, 10,
15, 20. In all cases, [18-crown-6] ) 2 µM. Electrospray
ionization mass spectra were determined in triplicate for
each solution.24 Under these circumstances, the ratio of
K+ to crown 1 was always 10 ([K+]:[1] ) 10:1) and the
concentration of Na+ was even higher (see Experimental
Section). This experiment was designed so that competi-
tion between Na+ and K+ in the same solution could be
reliably observed.
E lect r osp r a y Ion iza t ion Ma ss Sp ect r om et r y
Meth od . The fast atom bombardment method is ame-
(12) (a) Malhotra, N.; Roepstorff, P.; Hansen, T. K.; Becher, J . J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3709. (b) Zhang, H.; Chu, I.-H.; Leming,
S.; Dearden, D. V. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7415. (c) Katritzky,
A. R.; Malhotra, N.; Ramanathan, R.; Kemerait, R. C., J r.; Zimmerman,
J . A.; Eyler, J . R. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 6, 25. (d)
Sawada, M.; Shizuma, M.; Takai, Y.; Yamada, H.; Kaneda, T.;
J anafusa, T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4405.
(13) (a) J ohnstone, R. A. W.; Lewis, I. A. S. J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1984, 1268. (b) J ohnstone, R. A. W.; Lewis, I. A. S. Int. J .
Mass Spectrom. 1983, 46, 451. (c) J ohnstone, R. A. W.; Lewis, I. A. S.;
Rose, M. E. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 1597.
(14) Zhang, H.; Chu, I.-H. Leming, S.; Dearden, D. V. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 7415.
(15) Liou, C.-C.; Brodbelt, J . S. J . Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1992,
3, 543.
(16) Lee, S.; Wyttenbach, van Helden, G.; Bowers, M. T. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10159.
(17) (a) Bonas, G.; Boss, C.; Vegnon, M. R. Rapid Commun. Mass.
Spectrom. 1988, 2, 88. (b) Paker, D. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1985, 1129. (c) Laali, K.; Lattimer, R. P. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 496.
(18) (a) Medina, J . C.; Goodnow, T. T.; Rojas, M. T.; Atwood, J . L.;
Lynn, B. C.; Kaifer, A. E.; Gokel, G. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
10583-10595. (b) Medina, J . C.; Bert C. Lynn; Rojas, M. T.; Gokel, G.
W.; Kaifer, A. E. Supramol. Chem. 1993, 1, 145-153.
(19) Gokel, G. W.; Trafton, J . E. Cation Binding by Lariat Ethers.
In Cation Binding by Macrocycles; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1990;
p 253.
(20) Gokel, G. W.; Cram, D. J .; Liotta, C. L.; Harris, H. P.; Cook, F.
L. Org. Synth. 1977, 57, 30.
(21) J ohnson M. R., Sutherland, I. O., Newton, R. F. J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 586.
Isotop ic Cor r ection s Requ ir ed for Bin d in g Con -
sta n t Stu d ies. Normal isotopic distributions were as-
sumed to be present in the macrocycles and cations used
in the present study. Isotopic corrections were therefore
applied to the experimental data prior to assessing the
complexation constants. Five peaks are observed in a
typical Na+/K+/18-crown-6 mass spectrum (see Figure 1).
The observed peaks are 1‚Na+ (m/z ) 287.0), its isotope
peak (m/z ) 288.0), 1‚K+ (m/z ) 303.0), 1‚K+ 13C isotope
peak (m/z ) 304.1), and 1‚K+ 41K isotope peak (m/z )
305.0). In order to avoid systematic errors, especially for
small peak intensities, theoretical isotopic corrections
(see Experimental Section) were applied in order to
(22) Weintraub, S. T.; Pinckard, R. N.; Hail, M. Rapid Commun.
Mass Spectrom. 1991, 5, 309.
(23) Gokel, G. W.; Goli, D. M.; Minganti, C.; Echegoyen, L. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6786.
(24) Spectra for the [Na+/K+] ) 5 case were measured once.