Communications
order of magnitude, with room temperature values of 0.11,
0.21, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.04 cm2 (Vs)ꢀ1 for 1–5, respectively. The
order of the mobilities for compounds 1, 2, and 5, that is, 2 >
1 > 5, are seen to be in qualitative agreement with the
sharpness of the WAXD images shown in Figure 1. This
supports the expected dependence of charge transport on the
degree of columnar order. These largest mobility values
which approach those found for the crystalline and liquid-
crystalline phases of a hexadecyl-substituted HBC[6b] would
be surprising if a large portion of the positive charges resided
on the peripheral amine moieties: either the amines are
sufficiently well-organized within the intercolumnar space to
allow rapid hole transport between them, or the electrons,
which remain localized on the HBC cores, have an intra-
columnar mobility which is comparable with that of holes.
Unfortunately the TRMC technique cannot differentiate
between these two possibilities since it is insensitive to the
sign of the charge of the major carrier; but the former
explanation suggests that the hole mobilities in the present
discotic materials are considerably larger than those found in
disordered triarylamine solids.[21]
In conclusion, the new synthetic concept towards electro-
active arylamine substituted HBC materials can be used to
broaden the HBC family with high atom economy. Combi-
nation of the columnar superstructure formation of HBC and
the hole-transporting ability of both the HBC and arylamines
led to new kind of hole-transporting materials with high
carrier mobility, good film formation capability (expect
compound 1 and 2), and low ionization potential, which are
promising properties for organic devices.[1,2] The mixed-
valence compounds of oxidized 1–5, can be regarded as
ideal models for studying the intramolecular charge transfer
as a function of the molecular symmetry and distance between
the nitrogen centers, and the intermolecular association of
charged p systems.[22]
Figure 2. UV/Vis/NIR spectroscopic titration profile of compound 2 in
CH2Cl2 with THClO4 solution. Inset: temperature-dependent ESR spec-
tra of the oxidized mono radical cation of 2.
at 310 K for 2+C reflects an intramolecular spin exchange
between two nitrogen centers (Figure 2, inset). Upon going to
250 K, only a three-line signal is seen which resembles the
situation found for 1+C.[18] Upon lowering the temperature the
intensity of the ESR signals of 1+C and 2+C decreases,
suggesting p–p aggregate formation in solution (Figure 2,
inset). The long-wavelength absorption band of 2+C, thus can
be explained by the molecular cation absorption, which is
predicted to be around 1400 nm (AM1-CI calculation), and
an additional intramolecular charge-transfer process. Intra-
molecular charge-transfer reactions in mixed-valence triaryl-
amine systems have often been studied.[7,8,19] Herein, we
provide evidence for aggregation of the radical cations of 1–3
even at low concentration (about 10ꢀ5 m) and additional
intramolecular charge-transfer interactions between aryla-
mine moieties but no clear indication could be found for the
intermolecular charge transfer other than their p–p aggrega-
tion.
Received: March 31, 2004
Revised: June 17, 2004
The intracolumnar charge-carrier mobilities for com-
pounds 1 through 5, determined using the pulse-radiolysis
time-resolved microwave conductivity technique (PR-
TRMC)[6b,20] are shown as a function of temperature in
Figure 3. The mobilities are seen to differ by more than one
Keywords: arylamines · electron transfer · hole transport ·
.
liquid crystals · pi interactions
[1] a) C. W. Tang, S. A. VanSlyke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913 –
915; b) R. H. Friend, R. W. Gymer, A. B. Holmes, J. H. Bur-
roughes, R. N. Marks, C. Taliani, D. D. C. Bradley, D. A.
Dos Santos, J. L. BrØdas, M. Lögdlund, W. R. Salaneck, Nature
1999, 397, 121 – 128.
[2] a) C. W. Tang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1986, 48, 183 – 185; b) U. Bach,
D. Lupo, P. Compte, J. E. Moser, F. Weissörtel, J. Salbeck, H.
Spreitzer, M. Grätzel, Nature 1998, 395, 583; c) N. S. Sarififtci, L.
Smilowitz, A. J. Heeger, F. Wudl, Science 1992, 258, 1474 – 1476.
[3] Z. Bao, J. A. Rogers, E. Katz, J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 1895 –
1904.
[4] S. J. Zilker, ChemPhysChem 2000, 1, 72 – 87.
[5] M. Thelakkat, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2002, 287, 442 – 461.
[6] a) M. D. Watson, A. Fechtenkötter, K. Müllen, Chem. Rev. 2001,
101, 1267 – 1300; b) A. M. van de Craats, J. M. Warman, A.
Fechtenkötter, J. D. Brand, M. A. Harbison, K. Müllen, Adv.
Mater. 1999, 11, 1469 – 1472.
Figure 3. The temperature dependence of the one-dimensional charge-
carrier mobilities of compounds 1–5 as measured using the PR-TRMC
technique.
5334
ꢀ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5331 –5335