3348 Organometallics, Vol. 21, No. 16, 2002
Bunten et al.
able reaction conditions can be inferred to optimize
product yields and minimize reaction times. Reaction
of BINAP with oxygen in the absence of 2 in chloroform
shows no appreciable oxidation after 24 h, but reactions
using a 10-fold excess of BINAP relative to catalyst show
no traces of unoxidized BINAP after periods as short
as 72 h. The approximate yield ratios [BINAP(O)2]/
[BINAP(O)] were ∼2:1 and 1:1 in chloroform and
toluene, respectively (Figure S6). Turnover frequencies
for the catalytic reaction in chloroform and toluene are
0.16 and 0.12 h-1, with turnover numbers of at least 70
and 10, respectively. Attempts to get larger turnover
numbers were impractical because of the long reaction
times involved at ambient pressures. Reactions under
CO/O2 (3:1) mixtures in both solvents result in higher
monoxide formation, but the turnover frequency is
drastically reduced to 0.016 h-1, making the process
very slow. Reactions under pure O2 lead to incomplete
BINAP oxidation, even after long reaction times, and
consequently very low yields of BINAP(O) and BINAP-
(O)2 were observed. Elevated temperatures increase the
overall rate of reaction, but the ratios of BINAP(O)2 to
BINAP(O) are significantly increased.
Use of Oth er Liga n d s. Attempts to use ligands other
than CO for the catalytic reactions were unsuccessful.
Reactions with 10-fold excess of BINAP and 100-fold
excesses of norbornylene or cyclohexylisocyanide lead
to incomplete oxidation of BINAP. The former produced
only trace amounts of norcamphor and norborneneol,
whereas the later reacts rapidly with 2 to form mixtures
of isocyanide complexes,55,56 as evidenced by changes in
the infrared frequencies of the νCN bands.
Use of dppm in place of the excess BINAP led to
similar catalytic formation of the monoxide and dioxide
products in CDCl3, but reactions with dppe gave less
clear results. No further studies were undertaken.
The BINAP in complex 1 is oxidized by O2 to BINAP-
(O)2, but not catalytically.
Complex 2 (Figure S5) is a rare example of a crys-
tallographically characterized square planar chelate
bisphosphine complex of rhodium. A search of the
Cambridge Structure Database (CSD)65 yielded only two
chelated bisphosphine structures where L ) carbonyl-
chloro((2,2′-biphenyl-1,1′-diyl)bis(6,6′-di-tert-butyl-4,4′-
dimethoxy-2,2′-biphenyl-1,1′-diyl)diphosphite), which
crystallized in two different space groups.66 However,
other cis-chelate complexes, where L ) bis(diphen-
ylphosphino)ethane (dppe) and three o-carborane
phosphino derivatives,67,68 Ph2P(C2B10H10)PPh2, Ph2P-
(C2B10H10)P(NMe2)2, and (Me2N)P(C2B10H10)P(NMe2)2,
have been isolated and characterized by infrared and
31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy,32 but not by X-ray crystal-
lography. Phosphorus-rhodium bond lengths in 2 (2.341-
(1), 2.250(1) Å) are close to the average value (2.320 Å)
for a sample of 38 structures with the fragment RhP2-
(CO)Cl found on the CSD. Of these complexes, 24
contained trans-monophosphine ligands, 7 contained
bridging bisphophine ligands, 9 incorporated trans-
chelating bisphosphine ligands, and 2 were the cis-
chelate complexes mentioned above.
The action of oxygen on 2 results in the formation of
3 in approximately 50% yield, along with approximately
equivalent yields of BINAP(O)2 and CO2 and trace
amounts of an unidentified CO-containing product. The
crystal structure proved the existence of the mono-
oxidized BINAP coordinated to the rhodium center. A
search of the CSD revealed only two similar structures
published with BPMO ligands in Rh(I) complexes, the
ligands being [bis(isopropoxy)phosphoryl(diphenylphos-
phino)methane-O,P] ((O-i-Pr)2P(O)CH2PPh2)69 and [(di-
phenylphosphinomethylene)diphenylphosphineoxide-
O,P] (dppm(O)).16 Both complexes have Rh-P and
Rh-O bond lengths and phosphorus-oxygen bite angles
that are similar to those found for 3. Another interesting
feature of these complexes is the strong trans effect of
the oxygen donor on the carbonyl ligand. Rh-C bond
lengths are significantly shortened from 1.905(5) to
1.774(5) Å when changing from 2 to 3. Similar Rh-C
bond lengths of 1.79(1)69 and 1.78716 Å are observed for
the above analogous complexes. Infrared spectroscopy
of 3 in the C-O stretching region show a significant
decrease in νCO of 31 cm-1 in all solvents (Table 1).
Analogous complexes containing dppe(O),16 dppm(O),16
((O-i-Pr)2P(O)CH2PPh2), and ((O-Et)2P(O)CH2PPh2)69
ligands exhibit similar νCO stretching frequencies of
1995, 1985, 1990, and 1990 cm-1 in CH2Cl2, respec-
tively. The first compound shows a decrease in νCO of
15 cm-1 (Nujol) when going from dppe to dppe(O). The
decrease in Rh-C bond length and νCO stretching
frequencies of the BPMO complexes are conventionally
attributed to increased π-back-bonding from the metal
to the carbonyl carbon as a result of π-electron donation
of electrons from the oxygen to the metal. Gladiali et
al.9 have isolated some BINAP(O) complexes of Rh(I)
such as [{BINAP(O)}Rh(diolefine)][BF4], and labiliza-
Discu ssion
Syn th esis a n d Ch a r a cter iza tion . Rea ction s a n d
P r od u cts. The reaction of [Rh(COD)Cl]2 with 2 equiv
of (R)-BINAP leads to the formation of 1 in high yield.57
This complex is characterized as a bis bridged dimer
and is bent by an angle θ of 124.8°. Such bending is
common for this class of compounds ([L2RhCl]2), and a
large variety of bending angles ranging from practically
planar (160° < θ < 180°) or strongly bent (θ < 150°)
are observed.54,58-64 Bond lengths and angles for 1 are
characteristic for this class of complex.
(55) J ones, W. D. J .; Hessell, E. T. Organometallics 1990, 9, 718.
(56) J ones, W. D.; Hessell, E. T. New J . Chem. 1990, 14, 481.
(57) Although (R)-BINAP was used, the primary interest was in the
oxidation reactions and not the stereochemistry of the BINAP complex.
(58) Feiken, N.; Pregosin, P.; Trabesinger, G. Organometallics 1998,
17, 4510.
(59) Roucoux, A.; Thieffry, L.; Carpentier, J .-F.; Devocelle, M.;
Meliet, C.; Agbossou, F.; Mortreux, A.; Welch, A. J . Organometallics
1996, 15, 2440.
(60) Wang, K.; Goldman, M. E.; Emge, T. J .; Goldman, A. S. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1996, 518, 55.
(61) Hofmann, P.; Meir, C.; Hiller, W.; Heckel, M.; Riede, J .;
Schmidt, M. U. J . Organomet. Chem. 1995, 490, 51.
(62) Binger, P.; Haas, J .; Glaser, G.; Goddard, R.; Kru¨ger, C. Chem.
Ber. 1994, 127, 1927.
(63) Schnabel, C. R.; Roddick, D. M. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 1513.
(64) Curtis, D. M.; Butler, W. M.; Greene, J . Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17,
2928.
(65) 3D Search and Research Using the Cambridge Structural
Database. Allen, F. H.; Kennard, O. Chem. Des. Automat. News 1993,
8 (1), 1 and 31-37.
(66) Paciello, R.; Siggel, L.; Kneuper, H.-J .; Walker, N.; Roper, M.
J . Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 143, 85.
(67) Hill, W. E.; Silva-Trivino, L. M. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18, 361.
(68) Hill, W. E.; Silva-Trivino, L. M. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 2495.
(69) Le Gall, I.; Laurent, P.; Soulier, E.; Salaun, J .-Y. J . Organomet.
Chem. 1998, 567, 13.