Organic Letters
Letter
acid, while Renaud11 used trichloromethanesulfonyl chloride as
an α-chlorinating agent for aldehydes (Scheme 1c). Notwith-
standing the usefulness of these strategies, they are based on
toxic or reactive reagents, and starting materials not always
readily available. Moreover, with the exception of few cases
shown by Renaud, these approaches cannot be applied to a
direct synthesis of α-chloro aldehydes bearing quaternary
centers. A different approach, based on carbonyl homologation
followed by a Meinwald-type epoxide−aldehyde isomerization,
was reported in the 1970s by Kobrich (Scheme 1d).12
Nevertheless, the process required the internal quenching of
the unstable dichloromethyllithium at very low temperature
(−100 °C) and, as a second step, a thermally induced
isomerization. Inspired by Kobrich’s seminal work, and
counting on our experience in the use of flow chemistry as
sustainable technology for taming reactive intermediates,13 we
report herein a direct one-step synthesis of functionalized α-
chloro aldehydes bearing quaternary centers (Scheme 1e).
Even if the genesis of dichloromethylithium in continuous
flow conditions was recently reported,13d our investigation
considered a dihalocarbenoid generated from readily available
chloroiodomethane 1, for two reasons: (1) the installation of a
better leaving group (i.e., iodine) would favor the formation of
the α-chloroepoxide, precursor of the α-chloro aldehyde; and
(2) chloroiodomethane (with a boiling point (bp) of 108 °C)
could be an environmentally safer alternative to the low-boiling
dichloromethane (bp = 39.6). Moreover, since we were unable
to find previous reports on the use of chloroiodomethyllithium
1-Li in the direct preparation of α-chloro aldehydes, we
speculated that it would have been interesting to explore this
tactic. As reported in Scheme 2, first we tested 1-Li in the
Li.6c With the aim to get some insights on the lifetime of 1-Li
at −78 °C, a simple chemical method based on a lithiation/
deuteration sequence, and quantitative GC and MS analysis
was set up (Scheme 2c).14 The results of this study show that
quenching of 1-Li after 1 min produced 1-D in 22% yield, with
an entire recovery (1 + 1-D) of 32%. Thus, ∼70% of 1 is lost
upon lithiation, likely as a consequence of the chemical
instability of 1-Li. Prolonging the time up to 15 min, before
electrophilic quenching, resulted in a 17% recovery (1 + 1-D)
with >80% loss of 1. By using this simple approach, regardless
of the kinetic of the lithiation process, we could estimate the
lifetime of the lithium carbenoid 1-Li (i.e., <1 min) assessing
its unsuitability for an external quenching protocol. With the
aim to validate the flow microreactor technology, and the flash
chemistry approach,15 we conducted the same study on the
reactivity and lifetime of carbenoid 1-Li under continuous flow
conditions. A flow microreactor system consisting of two T-
shaped micromixers (M1 and M2) and two microtube reactors
(R1 and R2) was used for this purpose (see Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. Testing Reactivity and Lifetime of
Dihalocarbenoid 2 in Flow
Scheme 2. Testing Reactivity and Lifetime of
Dihalocarbenoid 1-Li in Batch
Reacting 1 with LDA in M1 generates intermediate 1-Li that
could be transferred in M2, where it is quenched (trapped)
with CD3OD. Several experiments were performed, varying the
temperature (T) and the residence time in R1 (tR1) and the
solution of each experiment directly analyzed by GC and MS
techniques, in order to assess mass recovery and deuterium
content. Analysis of the collected data allowed us to generate
the contour map reported in Scheme 3.
Under flow conditions (Scheme 3), the highest yields of 1-D
(94%) could be obtained at short residence times (tR1 = 330
ms) and at relatively high temperature (−20 °C). Note that
the yields reported in this contour map consider both the
recovery of 1 and 1-D and the deuterium content (see the
reaction with benzophenone, in batch at −78 °C, and under
internal quenching conditions. With our delight, we observed
the direct formation of the α-chloro aldehyde 3a in 55% yield.
Next, the same reaction was run under external quenching
conditions, with trapping of 1-Li just after 1 min (Scheme 2b).
In this latter case, 3a formed in a low 18% yield jointly to a
30% yield of the side product 4, likely deriving from an
eliminative dimerization of the highly chemically unstable 1-
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX