Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1493-1496
A Strip Liposome Immunoassay for Aflatoxin B1
J.-A. A. Ho*,†,‡ and R. D. Wauchope§
University of Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, Georgia 31793, Agricultural Research Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Tifton, Georgia 31793, and Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi-Nan University, Puli,
Nantou, 545 Taiwan
A liposome immunoassay (LIA), using fluorescent dye-loaded
liposomes whose surface has been tagged with the antigen of
interest, has been developed for a variety of assays, particularly a
flow injection automated procedure.9-13 As part of a project on
the development of a flow injection liposome immunoanalysis
(FILIA) system for AFB1, a procedure for tagging liposomes with
AFB1 using a bridging molecule was developed to overcome
hydrophobic disruption of the liposome structure. These lipo-
somes proved useful in a preliminary development of a test strip
semiquantitative assay for AFB1 that has potential as a rapid and
inexpensive field test.
A technique has been developed for the preparation of
aflatoxin B1 (AFB1 )-tagged liposomes encapsulating a
visible dye. These liposomes have several useful potential
analytical applications, one of which is demonstrated. A
simple plastic-backed nitrocellulose strip is the basis for
an assay for detecting AFB1 . Samples containing aflatoxin
B1 are allowed to migrate by capillary action along the strip
into a zone containing immobilized antibodies; then afla-
toxin B1 -tagged, dye-containing liposomes are allowed to
migrate into the same area, filling any remaining antibody
sites. The liposomes that bound to the antibody zone
exhibit an intense purplish pink color whose optical
density is inversely proportional to the aflatoxin concen-
tration in the sample. The device is capable of detecting
aflatoxin B1 at levels down to 2 0 ng and could serve as a
rapid procedure for visual screening of agricultural and
food samples for AFB1 or, with densitometry, as an
inexpensive quantitative assay.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Reagents and Materials. All inorganic chemicals and organic
solvents used were reagent grade or better. AFBl, polyclonal
antibody against AFB1, cholesterol, poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP,
MW 10 000), Tween-20, gelatin, Sephadex G-50, triethylamine
(TEA), Trizma base (tris[hydroxymethyl]aminomethane, Tris),
and n-octyl â-D-glucopyranoside (OG) were purchased from Sigma
(St. Louis, MO). Dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DPPE)
and sulforhodamine B were purchased from Molecular Probes
(Eugene, OR). Polycarbonate syringe filters of 3-, 0.4-, and 0.2-
µm pore size were purchased from Poretics (Livermore, CA), and
plastic-backed nitrocellulose membranes with pore size of >3 µm
were from Schleicher and Schuell (Keene, NH). Dipalmitoylphos-
phatidylcholine (DPPC) and dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol
(DPPG) were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL).
N-Succinimidyl-S-acetylthioacetate (SATA), 4(4-N-maleimidophe-
nyl)butyric acid hydrazide (MPBH), and N-ethylmaleimide (NEM)
were purchased from Pierce (Rockford, IL). Carnation nonfat dry
milk (NDM) powder was obtained locally.
There is a need for rapid and inexpensive field assays for
screening food and animal feed samples for mycotoxins. Immu-
noassays, which offer sensitivity, speed, and simplicity of opera-
tion, provide potential solutions for this need. Radioimmuno-
assays,1-2 antibody affinity columns,3 and enzyme-linked immuno-
sorbent assays (ELISA)4-7 have been developed for aflatoxin B1
(AFB1). Some of the immunoassays have been approved and
adopted by the AOAC.8 The Aflatest (Vicam L.P., Watertown, MA)
immunoaffinity column is widely used in the USDA and com-
modities at points of sale. However, the cost for a nonreusable,
single affinity column is about $7 U.S.
P reparation of Test Strips. A microprocessor-controllcd TLC
sample applicator, Linomat IV (CAMAG Scientific Inc., Wrights-
ville Beach, NC), was used to immobilize AFB1 antibody on the
plastic-backed nitrocellulose membranes. The membrane was cut
into 8 × 15.7 cm sheets, which were then mounted on a mobile
platform that moved at a constant rate in front of the airbrush
used to spray the antibody solution at concentration of 2 mg/ mL.
If a TLC sample applicator is not available, an alternative procedure
may be used in which antibody solution is manually dot-blotted
* Corresponding author. Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi-Nan
University, No. 1 University Rd., Puli, Nantou, 545 Taiwan. Fax: +886-49-2917956.
E-mail: jah@nanu.edu.tw.
† University of Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station.
‡ National Chi-Nan University.
§ U.S. Department of Agriculture.
(1) Langone, J. J.; Van Vunakis, H. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 1 9 7 6 , 56, 591-595.
(2) Sun, P. S.; Chu, F. S. J. Food Saf. 1 9 7 9 , 1, 67-75.
(3) Groopman, J. D.; Trudel, L. J.; Donahue, P. R.; Marshak-Tothstein, A.;
Wogan, G. N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1 9 8 4 , 81, 7728-7731.
(4) Chu, F. S.; Ueno, I. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1 9 7 7 , 33, 1125-1128.
(5) El-Nakib, O.; Pestka, J. J.; Chu, F. S. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem. 1 9 8 1 , 64,
1077-1082.
(9) Rule, G. S.; Palmer, D. A.; Reeves, S. G.; Durst, R. A. Anal. Proc. Incl. Anal.
Commun. 1 9 9 4 , 31 (11), 339-340.
(6) Lawellin, D. W.; Grant, D. W.; Joyce, B. K. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1 9 7 7 ,
34, 94-96.
(10) Edwards, A. J.; Durst, R. A. Electroanalysis 1 9 9 5 , 7 (9), 838-845.
(11) Lee, M. Y.; Durst, R. A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1 9 9 6 , 44, 4032-4036.
(12) Ho, J. A.; Durst, R. A. Anal. Chim. Acta 2 0 0 0 , 414, 51-60.
(13) Ho, J. A.; Durst, R. A. Anal. Chim. Acta 2 0 0 0 , 414, 61-69.
(7) Pestka, T.; Scott, P. M. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1 9 7 7 , 40, 1027-1031.
(8) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical
Chemists.: Arlington, VA, 1990; Section 999.06.
10.1021/ac010903q CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/06/2002
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 74, No. 7, April 1, 2002 1493