Macromolecules, Vol. 37, No. 24, 2004
Poly(triarylamine)s Containing Isothianaphthene Moieties 8957
acetate (20:1) as the eluent to give 2-bromo3-hexylthiophene
(3.06 g; 67%). 1H NMR (CDCl3), δ [ppm]: 7.15 (d, 1H), 6.78 (d,
1H), 2.54 (t, 2H), 1.55 (m, 2H), 1.28 (m, 6H), 0.87 (t, 3H). FT-
IR (KBr), v˜ [cm-1]: 3107, 2956, 2926, 2856, 1467, 1409, 992,
830, 713, 635. MS [m/z]: 246 (doublet), 97 ([C4H3SdCH]+).
1277, 1229, 1176, 1133, 875, 742, 682. UV-vis, λmax [nm]: 526
(CHCl3), 538 (film). End-group elemental analysis: 0.028 wt
% of iodine.
(iii) Polymer 3c. Further purification was done by repre-
cipitation of the polymer from CHCl3 in petrol ether (fraction
with a bp 60-80 °C). After drying in high vacuum, 0.77 g of
(ii) Step 2: 1,2-Bis(3’-hexylthienoyl)benzene. MF ) C28H34O2S2;
Mw ) 466.71 g/mol. 2-Bromo-3-hexylthiophene (5.0 g; 20.2
mmol) was slowly added to a refluxing mixture of iodine-
activated magnesium (0.49 g; 20.2 mmol) in abs. THF (30 mL).
After formation of the Grignard reagent (6 h reflux) it was
slowly added to a flask containing a solution of 1,2-di(S-
pyridinyl)benzenedithioate (3.40 g; 9.6 mmol) in abs. THF (150
mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 30 min, and finally
10% HCl (15 mL) was added to hydrolyze the complex formed.
The product was extracted with ether repeatedly, and the
combined organic fractions were washed with 2 M NaOH
solution and water until neutral and dried over Na2SO4. After
evaporation of the solvent, a light-brown, honey-like product
was obtained. Final purification by column chromatography
with cyclohexane/ethyl acetate (3:1) yielded a yellowish viscous
liquid (3.54 g; 74%). 1H NMR (CDCl3), δ [ppm]: 7.62 (m, 2H),
7.55 (m, 2H), 7.40 (d, 2H), 6.96 (d, 2H), 2.78 (t, 4H), 1.52 (m,
4H), 1.22 (m, 12H), 0.83 (t, 6H). FT-IR (KBr), v˜ [cm-1]: 3101,
3067, 3018, 2956, 2928, 2856, 1638, 1519, 1465, 1408, 1294,
1278, 1250, 912. MS [m/z]: 466 (M+), 299 ([C6H13-C4H2S-
CO-C6H4-CO]+), 228 ([OtC-C6H4-CO-C4H3SdCH]2+), 215
([OtC-C6H4-CO-C4H2S]2+), 97 ([C4H4SdCH]+).
1
polymer was collected with a yield of 78%. H NMR (CDCl3),
δ [ppm]: 7.97, 7.34, 7.14, 6.82 (m, 24H), 3.88 (m, 4H), 1.71
(m, 4H), 1.31 (m, 12H), 0.87 (m, 6H). FT-IR (KBr), v˜ [cm-1]:
3033, 2928, 2858, 1606, 1492, 1240, 820, 746. UV-vis, λmax
[nm]: 430-520 (CHCl3), 440-540 (film). End-group elemental
analysis: 0.018 wt % of iodine.
(b) Poly[1,3-bis(3-hexyl-2-thienyl) benzo[c]thiophene] (7). To
a solution of 1,3-bis(3-hexyl-2-thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene (7.5
g; 16.2 mmol) in dried CHCl3 (300 mL), powdered anhydrous
FeCl3 (10.54 g; 65 mmol) was added slowly during 6 h under
Ar at room temperature. After stirring for an additional 18 h,
the reaction mixture was poured into n-hexane as a bluish-
black powder (17.3 g) was precipitated. Soxhlet extraction with
methanol to remove Fe salts and unreacted monomer gave a
brown solid (8.9 g of dedoped polymer). After further Soxhlet
extraction with THF to dissolve the polymer left, 1.95 g (26%)
of black residue insoluble in THF was obtained (0.25% of Fe
content), which is also insoluble in common organic solvents
such as CHCl3, NMP, DMF, and DMAc. The THF solution of
the polymer was added slowly to n-hexane under vigorous
stirring to precipitate 1.7 g (23%) of high molecular weight
polymer containing 0.43% of Fe. The THF/n-hexane mother
liquor after evaporation of solvents gave a residue, which on
GPC analysis was detected as oligomers (3.46 g; 46% yield).
1H NMR (CDCl3), δ [ppm]: 7.71, 7.55, 7.33, 7.11 (8H), 2.70
(4H), 1.65 (4H), 1.23 (12H), 0.81 (6H). FT-IR (KBr), v˜ [cm-1]:
3060, 2952, 2924, 2854, 1641, 1453, 746. The polymer fraction
was treated as follows using an improved purification proce-
dure to reduce Fe content. The polymer was diluted with
CHCl3 followed by washing with 15 wt % HCl to remove
possible Fe-containing compounds such as FeCl3, FeCl2, Fe2O3,
Fe(OH)2, and Fe(OH)3, then water until neutral and dedoping
of the organic material by refluxing the CHCl3 solution
repeatedly (3×) with aqueous 25% NH3 for 30 min when the
color of the material changed from deep blue to reddish-brown.
The product was washed with aqueous KSCN solution to
remove the rest of the Fe salts and after washing with water,
drying over Na2SO4, and evaporation of CHCl3, the pure
polymer with a Fe content of only 0.013 wt % was obtained by
precipitating it from THF solution into n-hexane.
(iii) Step 3: 1,3-Bis(3-hexyl-2-thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene.
MF ) C28H34S3; Mw ) 466.78 g/mol. A mixture of 2,4-bis-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-1,3-dithia-2,4-diphosphetane-2,4-disulfide,
known as Lawesson reagent (2.0 g; 5 mmol), 1,2-bis(3′-
hexylthienoyl)benzene (2.2 g; 4.7 mmol), and CH2Cl2 (150 mL)
was refluxed for 30 min. After evaporation of CH2Cl2, ethanol
(150 mL) was added and the mixture was refluxed for an
additional 30 min. Finally, 500 mL of water was added, and
the product was extracted with ether. The combined ether
fractions were washed with copious amounts 10% NaOH and
water and dried. Final purification was done by column
chromatography (CH2Cl2, n-hexane 9:1) to obtain 1.78 g (81%)
1
of a yellow oil. H NMR (CDCl3), δ [ppm]: 7.56 (m, 2H), 7.36
(d, 2H), 7.08 (m, 2H), 7.04 (d, 2H), 2.64 (t, 4H), 1.57 (m, 4H),
1.19-1.24 (m, 12H), 0.78 (t, 6H). FT-IR (KBr), v˜ [cm-1]: 3065,
2956, 2926, 2856, 1457, 747. MS [m/z]: 466 (M+), 395 ([C6H13-
C4H2S-C8H4S-C4H2SdCH]+), 309 ([C6H13-C4H2S-C8H4S]+),
227 ([C8H4S-C4H2SdCH]2+).
2. Polymer Synthesis. (a) Poly[bis(diarylaminothienyl)-
isothianaphthene]s (3a-c). Poly[bis(diarylaminothienyl)iso-
thianaphthene]s (3a-c) were prepared by the following gen-
eral polycondensation procedure: 1,3-bis(5-iodo-2-thienyl)benzo-
[c]thiophene 2 (0.15 M), bis(secondary)amine (1a, 1b, or 1c)
(0.15 M), copper[0] (0.6 M), 18-crown-6 as a phase-transfer
catalyst (0.03 M), and potassium carbonate (1.2 M) in anhy-
drous o-dichlorobenzene (7 mL) were mixed at room temper-
ature and refluxed under nitrogen atmosphere for 5 days. The
reaction mixture was diluted with THF, and inorganic salts
were filtered off. After removing the solvent, the polymer was
dissolved in CHCl3, followed by refluxing this polymer solution
with 25% aqueous ammonia for 30 min to dedope any in situ
doping of the material, washed with water and methanol, and
dried in a vacuum. Then the polymer was repeatedly precipi-
tated into n-hexane from CHCl3.
(i) Polymer 3a. Final purification was done by reprecipitation
of the polymer in cyclohexane from CHCl3 solution. After
drying in high vacuum, 0.51 g of polymer was collected with a
yield of 63%. 1H NMR (CDCl3), δ [ppm]: 7.89, 7.34, 7.14, 6.80
(m, 24H), 2.53 (m, 4H), 1.55 (m, 4H), 1.24 (m, 20H), 0.84 (m,
6H). FT-IR (KBr), v˜ [cm-1]: 3029, 2924, 2852, 1603, 1494,
1284, 1061, 815, 745. UV-Vis, λmax [nm]: 497 (CHCl3), 520
(film). End-group elemental analysis: 0.031 wt % of iodine.
Acknowledgment. We thank Mrs. Helga Wietasch
and Dr. Haridas R. Karickal for synthesis of polymer
6. We gratefully acknowledge Sonderforschungsbereich
481 (Project B4), German Research Council (DFG), for
providing financial support for this research work.
Supporting Information Available: 1H NMR data of the
monomers and SEC plots for polymers 3a-c. This material is
References and Notes
(1) (a) Brabec, C. J.; Sariciftci, N. S.; Hummelen, J. C. Adv.
Funct. Mater. 2001, 11, 15-26. (b) Schilinsky, P.; Waldauf,
C.; Brabec, C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81 (20), 3885-3887.
(c) Padinger, F.; Rittberger, R. S.; Sariciftci, N. S. Adv. Funct.
Mater. 2003, 13 (1), 85-88.
(2) (a) Andersson, M.; Thomas, O.; Mammo, W.; Swensson, M.;
Theander, M.; Inganaes, O. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 1933.
(b) Noda, T.; Ogawa, H.; Noma, N.; Shirota, Y. J. Mater.
Chem. 1999, 9, 2177. (c) Imae, I.; Nawa, K.; Oshedo, Y.; Noma
N.; Shirota, Y. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 380-386.
(3) (a) Garnier, F.; Hajlaoui, R.; Yassar, A. Science 1994, 265,
1684-1686. (b) Katz, H. E.; Bao Z.; Gilat, S. L. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2001, 34, 359-369.
(ii) Polymer 3b. Further purification was done by Soxhlet
extraction with methanol. After drying in high vacuum, 0.47
g of polymer was collected with a yield of 43%.1H NMR
(CDCl3), δ [ppm]: 7.97 (m, 2H), 7.43, 7.28, 7.13, 6.82 (m, 20H).
FT-IR (KBr), v˜ [cm-1]: 3064, 2926, 2851, 1617, 1495, 1378,
(4) Thelakkat, M. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2002, 287, 442-461.
(5) Andersson, M.; Mammo, W.; Olinga, T.; Swensson, M.;
Theander, M.; Inganaes, O. Synth. Met. 1999, 101, 11.
(6) Lorcy, D.; Cava, M. Adv. Mater. 1992, 4, 562.