Paquette et al.
revealed by high-field 1H NMR analysis. Heating 10 with
the first-generation Grubbs catalyst9 in refluxing chlo-
roform or benzene gave no sign of reaction. When the
more reactive second-generation ruthenium catalyst10
was deployed instead, processing in hot benzene was
found to induce only double-bond migration as in 11 and
12. Related isomerizations have been previously re-
ported.11 In the present context, its operation suggests
that the intended internal coupling is kinetically inhib-
ited. A change in the functionalization pattern was
clearly mandated, and we therefore undertook to explore
that facet of Scheme 1 featuring precursors that have a
bulky substituent in â-orientation at C-7. Doing so was
expected to facilitate adoption of those conformational
changes potentially more conducive to the cyclization
reaction.
SCHEME 2a
The practicalities associated with diol 13, available via
a two-step deprotection of 5, allowed significant sums of
material to be brought forward by way of the doubly
protected acetal 14. Acid hydrolysis to unmask the ketone
carbonyl made possible the subsequent determination
that attack during sodium borohydride reduction pro-
ceeds preferentially from the more open â-surface. The
requisite inversion of configuration as 15 to 16 was
accomplished using an improved variant of the Mit-
sunobu reaction.12 The free hydroxyl group in 16, cleanly
liberated by exposure of 17 to lithium hydroxide in
aqueous THF, was protected as a tert-butyldiphenylsilyl
ether, and the primary hydroxyls were liberated by the
action of DDQ to furnish 20. The information garnered
earlier in connection with the preparation of 10 proved
to be transmittable to the elaboration of 22. We now
focused on the reactivity of 22 under RCM conditions.
In refluxing CH2Cl2 as the metathesis medium, neither
Grubbs catalyst promoted a chemical change. In agree-
ment with the previous observations, use of higher
temperatures (e.g., benzene at reflux) led to migration
of the double bond(s). Mass spectrometric analysis of
these reaction mixtures demonstrated unmistakably that
no 23 had been generated (Scheme 3).
a Reagents and Conditions: (a) m-CPBA, Na2HPO4, CH2Cl2
(99%); (b) TBAF, THF, rt (quant); (c) DDQ, CH2Cl2, H2O (quant);
(d) (COCl)2, DMSO, Et3N, CH2Cl2, -78 f -40 °C (89%); (e)
Ph3PdCH2, THF, 0 °C (77%); (f) Grubbs catalyst, C6H6, reflux (44%
of 11 and 36% of 12).
membered ring was attributed to conformational factors
that inhibit attainment of the proper SN2 reaction trajec-
tory.7 This particular methodology requires not only
spatial proximity of the reacting centers but also their
strictly defined orientation. A preferred protocol having
less stringent entropic demands should, on this basis,
serve better as a candidate for the intended mesocyclic
carbon-carbon bond formation. In light of the Chauvin
mechanism for ring closing metathesis (RCM),8 which
stresses the significance of metallocyclobutane and met-
allocarbene intermediates, the prospects for intramolecu-
lar formation of a cyclooctene double bond attracted our
attention. This choice was not without complications. The
difficulty arises from the fact that reliance must be placed
on adequate conformational flexibility within the cis-
fused decalin core.
In this paper, we delineate three attempts to harness
this particular power reaction for the purpose of accessing
vinigrol (1).
Migration of the Double Bond in the Octalin
Core. In light of the preceding developments, we next
considered the possibility of temporarily migrating the
double bond in several intermediates from its original
∆
Results and Discussion
3,4
location to the neighboring ∆2,3 site. As reflected in
Consequences of Preliminary Epoxidation. For
the RCM to proceed as planned, the endocyclic double
bond in 57 was initially protected to avoid its possible
participation. These considerations led us to advance by
means of the stereocontrolled epoxidation of acetal 5
(Scheme 2). This transformation was expedient in that
those stereochemical issues associated with reduction of
the carbonyl group were effectively skirted. By proceeding
in this direction, however, we were aware that potential
awkwardess arising from added steric congestion could
well manifest itself. Diene 10 was ultimately prepared
from 6 by sequential deprotection of the hydroxyl func-
tionalities, Swern oxidation, and 2-fold methylenation of
the resulting dialdehyde 9 by way of Wittig chemistry.
Relevantly, no epimerization at the allylic sites was
the model systems A and B (Figure 1), this relocation
was to be counted on for increased conformational flex-
ibility, such that the two side chains might be projected
axially with greater facility as suggested by MM3 calcu-
lations.
Three approaches to structural modification of the left-
hand domain were addressed in turn. The first-genera-
tion pathway was designed to involve 2-fold deployment
of the epoxide f allyl alcohol rearrangement under basic
conditions (Scheme 4). To evaluate this technology rela-
tive to the case at hand, resources were directed to the
preparation of 24, available from the disilylation of 19.
(9) Ulman, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7202 and
references therein.
(10) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999,
1, 953.
(8) (a) Harrison, J.-L.; Chauvin, Y. Makromol. Chem. 1971, 141, 161.
(b) Soufflet, J.-P.; Commereuc, D.; Chauvin, Y. Compt. Rend. Acad.
Sci. Ser. C 1973, 276, 169. (c) Chauvin, Y.; Commereuc, D.; Zaborowski,
G. Makromol. Chem. 1978, 179, 1285.
(11) Corey, E. J.; Guzman-Perez, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998,
37, 388.
(12) Dodge, J. A.; Trujillo, J. I.; Presnell, M. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 234.
506 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 2, 2005