Stetter Reaction in Room Temperature Ionic Liquids
FULL PAPERS
ture was refluxed for 20 h, using a Dean–Stark trap. After com-
pletion of the reaction, as indicated by TLC, the reaction mix-
ture was cooled to room temperature and successively washed
with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution, brine and dried over
MgSO4. It was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the
residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 to afford ketal
11; yield: 5.10 g (83%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d¼2.21 (t,
by evaporation under reduced pressure. The residue was eluted
through a silica gel column using a mobile phase of
(CH2Cl2:MeOH, 9:1) to afford haloperidol (14); yield:
0.291 g (65%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6): d¼1.52–
1.60 (m, 2H), 1.80–1.96 (m, 5H), 2.44–2.49 (m, 5H), 2.69–
2.72 (m, 2H), 7.26–7.31 (m, 4H), 7.41–7.44 (m, 2H), 8.10–
8.14 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, acetone-d6): d¼23.46,
36.96, 39.56, 50.43, 58.79, 71.43, 116.63 (d, JC,F ¼20.7 Hz),
¼
J
7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (t, J¼7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.70–3.77
(m, 2H), 3.95–3.99 (m, 2H), 6.94–7.03 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.45 (m,
2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d¼28.94, 35.88, 51.85,
65.03, 109.55, 115.32 (d, JC,F ¼21 Hz), 127.92 (d, JC,F ¼8 Hz),
138.48 (d, JC,F ¼3 Hz), 162.92 (d, JC,F ¼245 Hz), 174.08.
127.03, 127.18, 132.13 (d, JC,F ¼8.7 Hz), 136.56 (d, JC,F ¼
3.3 Hz), 139.94, 154.60, 172.20 (d, JC,F ¼250 Hz), 199.08; MS:
m/e¼376 (Mþ).
Acknowledgements
3-[2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-[1,3]dioxolan-2-yl]-
propionaldehyde (12)
´
We thank P. Guenot (CRMPORennes) for the mass spectral
`
analysis. This work was supported by the Ministere des Affaires
To a stirred solution of ketal 11 (2 g, 7.87 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(40 mL) was added DIBAL-H (1.11 g, 7.87 mmol, 1 M solution
in THF) at À788C and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h
at the same temperature. The reaction was quenched by adding
aqueous NH4Cl solution and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2ꢀ
25 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, concentrated
under reduced pressure, to give aldehyde 12 which was found
`
Etrangeres (fellowship to S. A.) as part of CEFISO/IFCOS.
S. C. thanks the CEFIPRA/IFCPAR (2305–1) for supporting
the visits to Rennes.
References and Notes
to be pure enough for the next step; yield: 1.64 g (93%);
1
[1] P. Wasserscheid, T. Welton, Ionic Liquids in Synthesis,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
[2] a) T. Welton, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071–2084; b) M. J.
Earle, K. R. Seddon, Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1391–
1398.
[3] a) P. Wasserscheid, W. Keim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 3772–3789; b) R. Sheldon, Chem. Commun.
2001, 2399–2400.
¼
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d¼2.24 (t, J 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.51
¼
¼
(td, J 7.0 Hz, J 2.0 Hz, 2H), 3.70–3.77 (m, 2H), 3.96–4.05
¼
(m, 2H), 6.99–7.10 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.50 (m, 2H), 9.75 (t, J
2.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d¼35.45, 39.15,
62.87, 109.88, 115.26 (d, JC,F ¼21 Hz), 127.84 (d, JC,F ¼8 Hz),
136.29 (d, JC,F ¼3 Hz), 166.04 (d, JC,F ¼245 Hz), 200.62.
[4] a) S. H. Schoefer, N. Kaftzik, P. Wasserscheid, U. Kragl,
4-[4-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidino]-1,1-
ethylenedioxy-1-(4-fluorophenyl)butane
Chem. Commun. 2001, 425–426; b) P. Lozano, T. Diego,
´
D. Carrie, M. Vaultier, J. L. Iborra, Chem. Commun.
2002, 692–693; c) F. van Rantwijk, R. M. Lau, R. A.
Sheldon, Trends Biotechnology 2003, 21, 131–138.
[5] S. V. Dzyuba, R. A. Bartsch, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 148–150.
[6] M. J. Earle, S. P. Katdare, K. R. Seddon, Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 707–710.
[7] For examples of the use of KOH as a base in imidazoli-
um solvents, see: a) M. J. Earle, K. R. Seddon, P. B.
McCormac, Green Chemistry 2000, 2, 261–262; b) S.
Chandrasekhar, Ch. Narasihmulu, V. Jagadeshwar,
K. V. Reddy, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3629–3630.
[8] V. K. Aggarwal, I. Emme, A. Mereu, Chem. Commun.
2002, 1612–1613.
To a stirred solution of 12 (0.5 g, 2.23 mmol) and 13 (0.94 g,
4.46 mmol) in methanol (5 mL) were added acetic acid
(0.13 g, 2.23 mmol) and NaCNBH3 (0.14 g, 2.23 mmol) at
room temperature and the solution was stirred for 30 h at the
same temperature. The reaction mixture was neutralized by
addition of aqueous NaHCO3 solution and extracted with
CH2Cl2 (2ꢀ25 mL). The organic phase was dried over
MgSO4 and the solvents were removed under reduced pres-
sure. Chromatography on SiO2 afforded haloperidol ethylene
1
ketal; yield: 0.728 g (78%); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d¼
1.55–1.75 (m, 4H), 1.85–1.95 (m, 2H), 2.05–2.18 (m, 2H),
2.35–2.47 (m, 4H), 2.75–2.85 (m, 2H), 3.73–3.76 (m, 2H),
3.99–4.02 (m, 2H), 6.98–7.02 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.30 (m, 2H),
7.41–7.43 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d¼20.63,
37.89, 38.10, 48.99, 58.15, 64.23, 70.63, 109.67, 114.98 (d,
JC,F ¼21.5 Hz), 125.82, 127.22 (d, JC,F ¼8 Hz), 128.09, 132.44,
138.04 (d, JC,F ¼3.1 Hz), 146.53, 162.15 (d, JC,F ¼244.2 Hz).
´
[9] a) V. Le Boulaire, R. Gree, Chem. Commun. 2000, 2195–
´
2196; b) I. A. Ansari, R. Gree, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1507–
1509.
[10] a) H. Stetter, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1976, 15, 639–647;
b) D. Enders, K. Breuer, in: Comprehensive Asymmetric
Catalysis, (Eds.: E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamo-
to), Springer, Heidelberg, 1999, pp. 1093–1102.
[11] J. H. Gong, Y. J. Im, K. Y. Lee, J. N. Kim, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 1247–1251.
[12] a) P. E. Harrington, M. A. Tius, Org. Lett. 1999, 4, 649–
651; b) C. C. Galopin, Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5589–
5591.
Haloperidol (14)
A solution of haloperidol ketal (0.5 g, 1.18 mmol) and concen-
trated HCl (0.5 mL) in methanol (5 mL) was refluxed for 2 h.
The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and suc-
cessively washed with 5% aqueous ammonia and water. The
solution was dried over MgSO4 and the solvent was removed
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1329–1334
asc.wiley-vch.de
ꢀ 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1333