F.-D. Boyer et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 563–566
565
Scheme 2.
Scheme 4.
Figure 3. Main 1H–13C long range correlations observed for com-
pound 23.
tives in the course of such oxidation reactions, since we
were not able to isolate any compounds with an oxidized
B ring when other studies15–17 have demonstrated the
sensitivity of this ring to similar oxidative procedures
in the presence of free phenolic groups; moreover, the
protecting groups used for the protection of the phenolic
groups have to be carefully chosen, since the penta-
O-acetyl catechin 12 did not react in these conditions.
Secondly, we have demonstrated the importance of the
substituent at C-8 in the yield of the transformation.
obtained with m-CPBA were not significantly affected
by the substitution pattern at C-8.
Another important feature of this transformation lies in
its versatility. Indeed, the oxidation of bromide 13 re-
sults in the formation in ca. 35% yield (Table 1, entry
14) of the desired 6-hydroxy-8-bromocatechin derivative
22. Hydroxy group at C-6 can be thereafter protected as
its benzyl ether and the bromide hydrolyzed (t-BuLi,
H2O), finally affording pentahydroxy flavan-3-ol 2419
in 87% yield (two steps, Scheme 3). The overall yield
of this synthetic sequence is furthermore better than
the yield obtained directly from 5. This result shows
that, even if C-6 has been proven to be the more reactive
site of catechin derivatives in these conditions, introduc-
tion of a bromine atom on carbon C-8 allows the protec-
tion of C-8, which is easily removed later through
hydrolysis.
References and notes
1. Ferreira, D.; Desmond, S. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 19, 517–
541.
2. The Flavonoids—Advances in Research Since 1986; Har-
borne, J. B., Ed.; Chapmann & Hall: London, 1994.
3. Harborne, J. B.; Baxter, H. The Handbook of Natural
Flavanoids; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999.
4. Ariga, T.; Koshiyama, I.; Fukushima, D. Agric. Biol.
Chem. 1998, 52, 2717–2722.
5. Rice-Evans, C. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 1994, 61, 103–116.
6. Jovanovic, S. V.; Steenken, S.; Tosic, M.; Marjanovic, B.;
Simic, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4846–4851.
7. Jovanovic, S. V.; Steenken, S.; Simic, M. G.; Hara, Y. In
Flavanoids in Health and Diseases; Rice-Evans, C., Packer,
L., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1997; pp 137–161.
8. Bors, W.; Heller, W.; Michel, C. In Flavanoids in Health
and Diseases; Rice-Evans, C., Packer, L., Eds.; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1997; pp 111–136.
The synthesis of elephantorrhizol was thereafter obvi-
ously achieved through protection of the hydroxy group
at C-6 of aldehyde 17 followed by a Dakin reaction20
performed on aldehyde 25 (Scheme 4) to furnish hexa-
O-benzyl elephantorrhizol 26. Total hydrogenolysis of
benzyl groups led to (+)-elephantorrhizol, spectroscopic
data of which were in agreement with those reported for
the natural product.11
9. Bors, W.; Michel, C. Free Radical Biol. Chem. 1999, 27,
1413–1426.
These results clearly show the importance of the protec-
tion pattern of the phenolic groups of the catechin deriva-
10. Majinda, R. T.; Abegaz, B. M.; Bezabih, M.; Ngadjui, B.
T.; Wanjala, C. C. W.; Mdee, L. K.; Bojase, G.; Silayo, A.;
Masesane, I.; Yeboah, S. O. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73,
1197–1208.
11. Moyo, F.; Gashe, B. A.; Majinda, R. R. T. Fitoterapia
1999, 70, 412–416.
12. Cuendet, M.; Potterat, O.; Hostettmann, K. Phytochem-
istry 2001, 56, 631–636.
13. Bernini, R.; Mincione, E.; Sanetti, A.; Bovicelli, P.;
Lupattelli, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4651–4654.
14. Bernini, R.; Mincione, E.; Sanetti, A.; Mezzetti, M.;
Bovicelli, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1087–1090.
15. Bernini, R.; Mincione, E.; Cortese, M.; Aliotta, G.; Oliva,
A.; Saladino, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5401–5404.
Scheme 3.