S. Tehranchian et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1023–1025
1025
Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, lg/mL) of selected
compounds against certain bacterial strainsa
Derivatives 6a, 6b and 6e showed significantacitviyt
against B. subtilis (MIC = 1–2 lg/mL) and compound
6e had the same potency as nitrofurantoin against B.
subtilis.
Compound
S. aureus
S. epidermidis
B. subtilis
4c
4e
16
2
1
NTb
NT
NT
NT
2
4
5c
5e
32
4
1
Acknowledgements
8
6a
6b
NT
NT
NT
NT
2
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
1
2
This work was supported by grants from the research
council of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and
Iran Chapter of TWAS.
6c
6e
4
1
Nitrofurantoin
Gentamycin
1
NT
1
a Disc diffusion method used to determine the MICs.17
b Not tested.
References and notes
1. Service, R. F. Science 1995, 270, 724.
2. Van Rhee, A. M.; Diddiqi, S. M.; Melman, N.; Shi, D.;
Padgett, W. L.; Daly, J. W.; Jacobson, K. A. J. Med.
Chem. 1996, 39, 398.
in trifluroacetic acid with thiosemicarbazide resulted in
the formation of compound 8.
3. Yasuma, T.; Oda, T.; Hazama, M.; Taketomi, S. WO 98
09,958, 1998; Chem. Abstr. 1998, 128, 217366v.
4. Mcmahon, G.; Hirth, K. P.; Tang, P. C. WO 96 40, 113,
1995; Chem. Abstr. 1997, 126, 126918u.
5. Broughton, H.; Chambers, M. S.; Hobbs, S. Ch.;
Macleod, A. M.; Reeve, A. J. WO 98 18,792, 1998; Chem.
Abstr. 1998, 129, 4573u.
6. Cagniant, P.; Kirsch, G.; Wierzbicki, M.; Lepage, F.;
Cagniant, D., et al. Eur. J. Med. Chem. Chim. Ther. 1980,
15, 5439.
7. Kane, J. M.; Staeger, M. A.; Dalton, C. R.; Miller, F. P.;
Dudley, M. W.; Ogden, A. M.; Kehne, J. H.; Ketteler, H.
J.; McCloskey, T. C.; Senyah, Y. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37,
125.
8. Mullican, M. D.; Wilson, M. W.; Connor, D. T.; Kostlan,
C. R.; Schrier, D. J.; Dyer, R. D. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36,
1090.
9. Boschelli, D. H.; Connor, D. T.; Bornemeier, D. A.; Dyer,
R. D.; Kennedy, J. A.; Kuipers, P. J.; Okonkwo, G. C.;
Schrier, D. J.; Wright, C. D. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1802.
10. Kane, J. M.; Dudley, M. W.; Sorensen, S. M.; Miller, F. P.
J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 1253.
Compounds 4–6 and 8 were screened for their antimi-
crobial activity by using cup–plate agar method at a
concentration of 300 lg/disc against Staphylococcus aur-
eus ATCC 29737, S. epidermidis ATCC 12229, Bacillus
cereus ATCC 1274, B. subtilis ATCC 12711, Pseudomo-
nas aeruginosa ATCC 9027, Escherichia coli ATCC
8739, Candida albicans ATCC 10231, Aspergilus niger
ATCC 16404 (Table 1).16 The preliminary results of
antimicrobial activities indicated that some of the com-
pounds exhibited a moderate to good activity against
Gram positive strains, however none of the compounds
exerted a significant effect against the Gram negative
strains or fungi. Presence of bulky group of n-butyl or
p-nitrophenyl at 4-position of 1,2,4-triazole in com-
pounds 4 and 5 produced active compounds against
Gram positive strains. Although, S-methylation of
1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones 4c,e resulted in broader activity
of the obtained compounds 5c,e againstmore bacetrial
strains but it did not cause to make more potent deriva-
tives. 5-Amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole 8 showed no antimi-
crobial activity.
11. Hui, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z. Indian J. Chem. 1999, 38B,
1066.
12. Rollas, S.; Karakus, S.; Durgun, B. B.; Kiraz, M.;
Erdeniz, H. Farmaco 1996, 51, 811.
13. Vashi, B. S.; Mehta, D. S.; Shah, V. H. Indian J. Chem.
1996, 35B, 111.
14. Ate, O.; Kocabalkanli, A.; Utuk-Sani, G.; Ekinci, A. C.;
Vidin, A. Drug Res. 1997, 47, 1134.
15. Prim, D.; Kirsch, G. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 2449.
16. Barry, A. L. The Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test:
Practical and Practices; Illus lea and Febiger: Philadel-
phia, 1976; p 180; Biol. Abstr. 1977, 64, 25183.
17. Chand, S.; Lusunzi, I.; Veal, D. A.; Williams, L. R. J.
Antibiot. 1994, 11(47), 1295.
In addition substitution of amino group of 8 resulted to
compounds 6a–e with antifungal activity and high po-
tency against B. subtilis. Determination of the minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the potent
derivatives against certain bacterial strains (Table 2)
indicates that compound 4e was the most active deriva-
tive against S. aureus (MIC = 2 lg/mL), its activity was
equal to nitrofurantion, compounds 4c and 5c were the
mostpotentcompounds against S. epidermidis and their
activities were equal to gentamycin (MIC = 1 lg/mL).