the reaction has not been used very often because its synthetic
utility depends on the ability to control the thermodynamic
ratio of the two regioisomeric azides.5 This is infrequently
observed as it is normally substrate-dependent. Herein, we
report the successful execution of this transposition via a
Mitsunobu reaction of 2 with hydrazoic acid followed by a
sterically biased 3,3-sigmatropic rearrangement of the result-
ing allylic azide with extraordinarily good thermodynamic
selectivity. Amino acids6,7 or N-heterocycles8 are obtained
depending on the method of cleavage of the chiral auxiliary.
Metal-halogen exchange reaction of vinyl iodides 4a-d
or vinyl bromide 4e furnished the corresponding vinyllithi-
ums. Each was added separately and stereoselectively to 1
Table 1. Selectivities in the Mitsunobu/Azide Rearrangement
of 5
9
in the presence of AlMe3 to give 5a-e in 54-67% yields
and excellent isomeric ratios (Scheme 2). In all cases, the
diastereomeric alcohols were separable by silica gel column
chromatography.
a Isolated yield. b Measured by HPLC against authentic mixtures of 7
1
and 8. c Measured by H NMR.
Scheme 2. AlMe3-Promoted Vinyllithium Addition to 1
It is unusual for the Mitsunobu reaction of allylic alcohols
to give SN2′-displacement products. There are known cases
of SN2′ regioselectivity in that reaction, but in most of these
cases the alkene is electronically biased.11 Mulzer and co-
workers have performed Mitsunobu reactions of several
chiral allylic alcohols with phthalimide and reported that
regioselectivities depended on the substitution pattern of the
alkene (electronic and steric biases).12
Mitsunobu10 reaction of allylic alcohols 5a-e with hy-
drazoic acid gave exclusively azides 7a-e and no detectable
amount of SN2 product 9a-e (Table 1). The stereoselectivity
(7/8) of the reaction varied from very good (92:8) to excellent
(98:2).
Azides 7 are thus more likely formed via a normal SN2-
selective Mitsunobu reaction followed by a 3,3-sigmatropic
rearrangement of the resulting allylic azides. The rearrange-
ment, we believe, is under thermodynamic control, and the
steric bulk of the menthyl moiety destabilizes regioisomers
9 (or 10). Also, the stereochemical integrity of the initially
formed azides 9 is preserved during the concerted rearrange-
ment.13 We believe that the minor isomer 10 arises from
some SN2′ displacement by the azide. Preliminary evidence
for this mechanistic rational comes from the Mitsunobu
reactions of 5f (R ) Ph, entry 6), which gave predominantly
9f, presumably because of its increased stability due to
conjugation of the double bond with the phenyl ring.14 In
this case, the reaction was much less selective giving a 3:1
ratio of 9f/10f. More importantly, when the diastereomeric
alcohol 6f was submitted to the Mitsunobu conditions, the
ratio of 9f/10f was now reversed (1:3). The rearrangement
being concerted, this lower diastereoselectivity cannot be
explained by an SN2 displacement followed by rearrange-
ment. The identical but reversed ratios observed from 5f and
6f rules out an SN1 mechanism to explain the lower
(4) (a) Gagneux, A.; Winstein, S.; Young, W. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1960, 82, 5956-5957. (b) Chida, N.; Tobe, T.; Murai, K.; Yamazaki, K.;
Ogawa, S. Heterocycles 1994, 38, 2383-2388. (c) Murahashi, S.-I.;
Taniguchi, Y.; Imada, Y.; Tanigawa, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3292-
3303. (d) Panek, J. S.; Yang, M.; Muler, I. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4063-
4064. (e) Cardillo, G.; Fabbroni, S.; Gentilucci, L.; Perciaccante, R.;
Piccinelli, F.; Tolomelli, A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 533-536. (f) Capaccio, C.
A. I.; Varela, O. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4945-4954. (g) Fava,
C.; Galeazzi, R.; Mobbili, G.; Orena, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001,
12, 273-2741. (h) Safi, M.; Fahrang, R.; Sinou, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,
31, 527-530.
(5) Trost, B. M.; Pulley, S. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 8737-8740.
(6) (a) Barret, G. C.; Elmore, D. T. Amino Acids and Peptides; University
Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1998. (b) Sardina, F. J.; Rapoport, H. Chem. ReV.
1996, 96, 1825-1872; (c) Williams, R. M. In Organic Chemistry Series
Volume 7: Synthesis of Optically ActiVe R-Amino-Acids; Baldwin, J. E.,
Magnus, P. D., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1989. (d) Duthaler, R. O.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1539-1650. (e) Lescrinier, T.; Busson, R.; Rozenski,
J.; Janssen, G.; Aerschot, A.; Herdewijin, P. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 6965-
6972.
(7) Amino acids are used as key structural units of chiral catalysts for
enantioselective synthesis. See: (a) List, B.; Pojarliev, P.; Biller, W. T.;
Martin, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 827-833. (b) Priem, G.; Pelotˆıer,
B.; Macdonald, S. J. F.; Anson, M. S.; Campbell, I. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 3844-3848.
(8) (a) Hesse, M. In The Alkaloids, Nature’s Curse or Blessing?; Wiley-
VCH: Zu¨rich, 2002; 413 pp. (b) Yamamura, S.; Hirata, Y. In The Alkaloids;
Manske, R. H. F., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1975; Vol. 15, p 41.
(c) Yamamura, S. In The Alkaloids; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic Press: New
York, 1986; Vol, 29, p 265.
(11) (a) Charrette, A. B.; Coˆte´, B.; Monroc, S.; Prescott, S. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 6888-6894. (b) Sobti, A.; Sulikowski, G. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 3661-3664. (c) Ramesh, N. G.; Balasubramanian, K. K.
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 255-272.
(12) Mulzer, J.; Funk, G. Synthesis 1995, 101-112.
(13) Evidence for a concerted mechanism for azide rearrangement was
provided by Padwa and co-workers. See: Padwa, A.; Sa`, M. M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 5087-5090.
(14) Further discussion on the mechanism will be presented in the full
account of this work.
(9) Spino, C.; Granger, M.-C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4735-4737.
(10) (a) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1-28. (b) Hughes, D. L. Org.
React. 1992, 42, 335-656. (c) Hughes, D. L. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1996,
28, 127-164.
4770
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 21, 2005