Scheme 1. Transition-State Considerations That Guided
Development of the O-Directed Free-Radical Hydrostannation of
Disubstituted Alkyl Acetylenes with Ph3SnH/Et3B
Scheme 2 O-Directed Free-Radical Hydrostannation of Alkyl
Acetylenes Bearing a Terminal Propargyl 1,3-Dioxolanea
siderable thought, we eventually decided to examine the
utility of Ph3SnH and cat. Et3B in PhMe at rt for this purpose,
based on the following considerations.
Because the central tin atom in Ph3SnH is connected to
three electron-withdrawing phenyl groups, we believed that
it would have enhanced Lewis acidity compared with Bu3-
SnH and that it would therefore coordinate to the O-atom of
propargylically oxygenated alkyl acetylenes much more
effectively than the latter. We also believed that O-coordi-
nated Ph3SnH would more readily undergo H-atom abstrac-
tion than uncoordinated Ph3SnH and that O-coordinated
triphenylstannyl radicals would have a longer lifetime in
solution compared with their uncoordinated counterparts, due
to the Sn atom of the former species being significantly more
hindered. We reasoned that by creating a much longer-lived
O-coordinated tin-centered radical, we might potentially
improve the prospects for delivering the tin unit to the
R-acetylenic carbon of 14. We further postulated that if Ph3-
SnH was employed for hydrostannation (as opposed to Bu3-
SnH), greatly magnified steric repulsive effects would operate
in the vinyl radical H-atom abstraction step, owing to the
bent nature of alkylvinyl radicals 158 and the likelihood that
such radicals would abstract hydrogen from the stannane via
a transition state that would minimize steric repulsions
between the bulky Ph3Sn group of 15 and the incoming
stannane, while simultaneously avoiding A1,3 strain (Scheme
1). All told, we predicted that the transition state that would
lead to 16 would be considerably more favored with Ph3-
SnH than the corresponding one with Bu3SnH, and as
consequence, we postulated that higher regio- and stereo-
selectivity would result with the former stannane.
a N.B.: minor isomer structures are only assigned tentatively.
and highly reliable protocol for obtaining vinylstannanes of
general structure 16 with excellent levels of regio- and
stereocontrol, in good yield (Scheme 1). Our preferred
procedure utilizes 1.5 equiv of commercially available Ph3-
SnH and 0.1 equiv of Et3B in PhMe at rt9 and conducts the
hydrostannation for anywhere between 3 and 72 h at 0.1 M
concentration with respect to the starting disubstituted alkyne.
Initially, we examined the acetylenes 18, 21, 24, 27, and
30 (Scheme 2) in the Ph3SnH/cat. Et3B rt process. In every
case, the anticipated vinylstannanes 19, 22, 25, 28, and 31
all emerged with selectivities that exceeded 22:1 (Scheme
2) and yields that ranged between 51 and 86%. The modest
yields encountered in some runs are merely a reflection of
the difficulties sometimes encountered in separating certain
of these products from hexaphenylditin by SiO2 flash
chromatography. In all cases, the hydrostannation reactions
were themselves very clean according to TLC analysis, and
the starting alkyne was always fully consumed (Scheme 2).
In view of these successes, we decided to examine the
scope and utility of our O-directed hydrostannation process
in other propargylically oxygenated disubstituted alkyne
systems where there was additional substitution â- to the
acetylenic carbon (Scheme 3). In the cis-1,3-dioxolane
systems that we studied (33a, 33b, and 33c), a net anti-
addition of the stannane occurred to the alkylacetylene, with
With this picture of the situation in mind, we applied the
Ph3SnH/cat. Et3B hydrostannation process9 to a wide range
of alkylacetylene substrates 14 and now report a convenient
(5) Liron, F.; Le Garrec, P.; Alami, M. Synlett 1999, 246.
(6) Keck, G. E.; Wager, T. T.; Rodriguez, J. F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 5176.
(7) Dodero, V. I.; Koll. L. C.; Mandolesi, S. D.; Podesta, J. C. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2002, 650, 173.
(8) The ESR data that is available on simple R-alkylvinyl radicals suggests
that they adopt a rapidly equilibrating sp2 bent structure. See, for example:
(a) Rubin, H.; Fischer, H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 1670. (b) Fessenden,
R. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 71, 74.
(9) Nozaki, K.; Oshima, K.; Utimoto, K. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 923.
5370
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 24, 2005