C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
In summary, we have reported an approach for the synthesis of
nonpeptidic scaffolds capable of displaying protein-like side chains
by swapping amide bonds with 1,2,3-triazole rings. The overall
conformation of these triazole oligomers appears to be dictated by
dipole-dipole interactions between adjacent rings. Solution NMR
studies suggest that a zigzag conformation, which closely mimics
the â-strand structure, predominates in two different tetramers.
Acknowledgment. We thank Prof. Samuel Gellman for insight-
ful comments, Prof. M. G. Finn and Prof. Scott Rajski for helpful
discussions and generous donations of the TBTA ligand, and Po
Hu and Prof. Yingkai Zhang for performing the ab initio calcula-
tions. P.S.A. is grateful for financial support from the Research
Corporation (Cottrell Scholar Award) and NYU (Whitehead Fel-
lowship). We thank the NSF for equipment Grants MRI-0116222
and CHE-0234863, and the NCRR/NIH for Research Facilities
Improvement Grant C06 RR-16572.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed conformational analy-
ses, synthetic procedures, and characterization of monomers and
oligomers (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the
Figure 3. (a) A cross-section of the ROESY spectra of 4b (in DMSO-d6)
displaying cross-peaks between the aromatic and the CR protons. (b)
Predominant triazolamer conformation revealed by ROESY experiments.
Solid and dashed lines indicate observed strong and weak NOE cross-peaks,
respectively. (c) Comparison of triazolamer 4b in a zigzag conformation
(top) to a peptide â-strand (tetraalanine) (bottom). The triazolamer mimics
a peptide â-strand with similar axial distances between the i and i + 2 side
chains. For clarity, side chains are depicted as methyl groups.
References
(1) Yin, H.; Hamilton, A. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4130-4163.
(2) Gellman, S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 173-180.
(3) (a) Sanford, A. R.; Yamato, K.; Yang, X. W.; Yuan, L. H.; Han, Y. H.;
Gong, B. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 271, 1416-1425. (b) Hill, D. J.; Mio,
M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101,
3893-4011. (c) Barron, A. E.; Zuckermann, R. N. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 1999, 3, 681-687. (d) Stigers, K. D.; Soth, M. J.; Nowick, J. S.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 714-723.
(4) (a) Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101,
3219-3232. (b) Seebach, D.; Matthews, J. L. Chem. Commun. 1997,
2015-2022.
(5) Hirschmann, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1278-1301.
(6) (a) Smith, A. B.; Favor, D. A.; Sprengeler, P. A.; Guzman, M. C.; Carroll,
P. J.; Furst, G. T.; Hirschmann, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 9-22.
(b) Smith, A. B.; Hirschmann, R.; Pasternak, A.; Akaishi, R.; Guzman,
M. C.; Jones, D. R.; Keenan, T. P.; Sprengeler, P. A.; Darke, P. L.; Emini,
E. A.; Holloway, M. K.; Schleif, W. A. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 215-
218.
kcal/mol more stable than the syn conformations. We anticipated
that the restriction imposed by the anti conformation on the possible
number of rotamers may lead to a specific set of defined backbone
structures.
Examination of the 2D NMR spectra reveals that the backbones
of triazolamers 3 and 4 predominantly adopt zigzag structures
arising from the anti conformation (Figure 3). NMR studies were
performed in acetone-d6 or DMSO-d6 solutions;15 a combination
of TOCSY, DFQ-COSY, and ROESY experiments was used to
(7) (a) Deng, S.; Taunton, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 299-301. (b) Wipf, P.; Fritch,
P. C.; Geib, S. J.; Sefler, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4105-
4112.
(8) (a) Brik, A.; Alexandratos, J.; Lin, Y. C.; Elder, J. H.; Olson, A. J.;
Wlodawer, A.; Goodsell, D. S.; Wong, C. H. ChemBioChem 2005, 6,
1167-1169. (b) Horne, W. S.; Yadav, M. K.; Stout, C. D.; Ghadiri, M.
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15366-15367. (c) Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless,
K. B. Drug DiscoVery Today 2003, 8, 1128-1137.
1
assign H NMR resonances. The anti conformation can also lead
to a turn backbone structure, which was ruled out through NMR
studies (see Supporting Information for details). It remains to be
determined what specific backbone structure will predominate in
longer oligomers or in compounds with different side chain groups.
The zigzag triazolamer structure is reminiscent of peptide
â-strand conformation (Figure 3c) and oligopyrrolinones described
by Smith and Hirschmann.6 The axial distance between i and i +
2 residues in â-strands is 7.2 Å; this distance is roughly 7.9 Å in
the zigzag triazolamer. The Câ to Câ distances in adjacent residues
are 5.5 Å in â-strands and a little longer (6.8 Å) in the triazolamer.
Thus, one surface of the zigzag triazolamer may effectively mimic
a â-strand and prove useful for targeting protein pockets and
surfaces involved in â-strand recognition.16 Although the triazolamer
backbone does not offer a â-strand’s hydrogen bond functionality,
the N-2 and N-3 electron pairs may serve as hydrogen bond
acceptors.8a
(9) Hitotsuyanagi, Y.; Motegi, S.; Fukaya, H.; Takeya, K. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 3266-3271.
(10) Bourne, Y.; Kolb, H. C.; Radic, Z.; Sharpless, K. B.; Taylor, P.; Marchot,
P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 1449-1454.
(11) Synthesis and characterization of the 1,2-substituted oligomers will be
described in due course.
(12) Alper, P. B.; Hung, S. C.; Wong, C. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6029-
6032.
(13) Wang, Q.; Chan, T. R.; Hilgraf, R.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B.; Finn,
M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3192-3193.
(14) Molecular mechanics studies were performed with Macromodel (MMFF
force field in chloroform), and ab initio calculations were conducted with
the Gaussian 03 program package (DFT B3LYP method at 6-31G* level).
(15) Acetone and DMSO were chosen because the aromatic protons were well
dispersed in these solvents.
(16) Loughlin, W. A.; Tyndall, J. D. A.; Glenn, M. P.; Fairlie, D. P. Chem.
ReV. 2004, 104, 6085-6117.
JA056406Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 49, 2005 17135