2346
K. Fukase et al.
LETTER
(9) Fukase, K.; Yoshimura, T.; Hashida, M.; Kusumoto, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 4019.
(10) Fukase, K.; Yasukochi, T.; Nakai, Y.; Kusumoto, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3343.
(11) Fukase, K.; Nakai, Y.; Egusa, K.; Porco, J. A.; Kusumoto, S.
Synlett 1999, 1074.
(12) Falb, F.; Yechezkel, T.; Salitra, Y.; Gilon, C. J. Peptide Res.
1999, 53, 507.
(13) Benzylcarbonyl and benzyl-type tags can be removed by
catalytic hydrogenolysis using Pd catalyst.
(14) Egusa, K.; Fukase, K.; Kusumoto, S. Synlett 1997, 675.
(15) Yasukochi, T.; Fukase, K.; Kusumoto, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 6591.
duced to the stainless steel affinity column (4.6 mm × 250
mm) and the flow channel was switched to wash the
column with CH2Cl2. During this time, the desired disac-
charide 16 was trapped in the column, and then eluted
with CH2Cl2–MeOH (1:1); the product 16 was desorbed
and obtained in 91% yield.
As described above, the present SAS method using a
podand tag was successfully applied to oligosaccharide
synthesis.22 Because of the simplicity of the purification
procedure, SAS is expected to be useful for automated
synthesis, such as in combination with the continuous
flow system.
(16) a-Selective glycosylation in CPME: Tokimoto, H.;
Fujimoto, Y.; Fukase, K.; Kusumoto, S. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2005, 16, 441.
Acknowledgment
(17) Glycosylation with nitropyridyl glycoside gave better results
than with glycosyl fluoride and thioglycoside. The
fucosylation stopped at 50% consumption of 33. The
reaction mixture was applied to SAS to give a mixture of 33
and trisaccharide 35. After TFA was removed by liquid–
liquid separation, the mixture was subjected to glycosylation
with fucosyl donor 34, again. This procedure was repeated
twice and the resulting compound 35 was finally purified by
silica gel chromatography.
The present work was conducted with the aid of the Micro-Chemi-
cal Plant Technology Union (MCPT) for the Project of Micro-Che-
mical Technology for Production, Analysis, and Measurement
Systems financially supported by NEDO. The present work was
also financially supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research No. 15310149 from the Japan Society for the Promotion
of Science.
(18) Pennemann, H.; Hessel, V.; Loewe, H. Chem. Eng. Sci.
2004, 59, 4789.
(19) Jahnisch, K.; Hessel, V.; Loewe, H.; Baerns, M. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 406.
(20) Ratner, D. M.; Murphy, E. R.; Jhunjhunwala, M.; Snyder, D.
A.; Jensen, K. F.; Seeberger, P. H. Chem. Commun. 2005,
578.
(22) Representative Procedure of SAS Method. Preparation
of 32.
References
(1) (a) Zhang, W. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2004, 7, 784.
(b) Yoshida, J.; Itami, K. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3693.
(c) Curran, D. P. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1649.
(d) Porco, J. A. Jr. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening
2000, 3, 93.
(2) Zhang, S.-Q.; Fukase, K.; Kusumoto, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 7479.
To a solution of the acceptor 30 (77 mg, 76 mmol),
trichloroacetimidate 31 (112 mg, 227 mmol), and molecular
sieves 4 Å in CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL) was added TMSOTf (2.7 mL,
15 mmol) at 0 °C under Ar atmosphere. After the reaction
mixture was stirred for 1 h at r.t., the resulting mixture was
filtered to remove the molecular sieves before applying to
the affinity separation. The mixture was directly charged
(3) Zhang, S.-Q.; Fukase, K.; Izumi, M.; Fukase, Y.; Kusumoto,
S. Synlett 2001, 590.
(4) Fukase, Y.; Zhang, S.-Q.; Iseki, K.; Oikawa, M.; Fukase, K.;
Kusumoto, S. Synlett 2001, 1693.
(5) Fukase, K.; Zhang, S.-Q.; Fukase, Y.; Umesakao, N.;
Kusumoto, S. In New Discoveries in Agrochemicals; Clark,
J. M.; Ohkawa, H., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 892,
American Chemical Society: Washington DC, 2005, 87–98.
(6) The podand tag with a shorter chain length showed weaker
affinity to the ammonium ion column, whereas the tag
having longer chain length, such as 6, showed comparable
affinity with the corresponding crown ether derivatives.
+
onto ArgoPore-NH3 ·CF3COO– filled in a syringe-like
column (Varian, Bond Elut empty cartridges with frits,
column size: 2.0 cm × 8.5 cm, resin 3.8 g), prepared
according to ref. 7. After untagged compounds were washed
off with CH2Cl2 (200 mL), the tagged product 32 was eluted
with CH2Cl2–MeOH (1:1, 50 mL). Evaporation of the
solvents afforded the desired product 32 as a yellow oil (95
mg, 93%): ESI-MS(positive): m/z = 1367.50 [M + Na]+. 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.32 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1 H,
ClAzb), 7.24 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H, ClAzb), 7.12 (d, J = 8.2 Hz,
1 H, ClAzb), 6.53 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 2 H, –C6H3–CH2–OCO),
6.47 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1 H, –C6H3–CH2–OCO), 5.96–5.80 (m, 2
H, –CH2–CH=CH2 × 2), 5.31–5.16 (m, 6 H, H-4¢, –CH2–
CH=CH2 × 2, H-2¢), 5.09 (s, 2 H, –C6H3–CH2–OCO), 4.95
(dd, J = 3.4, 10.4 Hz, 1 H, H-3¢), 4.90 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H,
ClAzPh–CH2), 4.81 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1 H, H-1), 4.78 (d,
J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H, NH), 4.60 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, H-1¢), 4.56–
4.48 (m, 4 H, ClAzPh–CH2, OCO–CH2-CH=CH2, H-6a),
4.23 (dd, J = 3.7, 11.5 Hz, 1 H, H-6b), 4.15–4.08 [m, 5 H, –
C6H3 (OCH2)2, –CH2–CH=CH2], 3.98–3.93 (m, 2 H, –CH2-
CH=CH2, H-2), 3.89–3.53 {m, 33 H, –C6H3[OCH2CH2–
(OCH2CH2)2–OCH2CH2OMe]2, H-4, H-5, H-5¢, H-6¢, H-3},
3.37 (s, 6 H, MeO × 2), 2.13, 2.05, 1.96 (s, 12 H, Ac × 4).
(7) The maximum adsorption of 8 to ArgoPore-NH3 ·CF3COO–
+
was determined as follows: the solid-phase extraction
column (Varian, Bond Elut empty cartridges with frits, 6 mL
capacity) was filled with ArgoPore®-NH2 (1.74 g, Argonout
Technologies, Inc). The resin column was washed with
CH2Cl2–MeOH (1:1) and CH2Cl2 (or toluene). The amino
groups on the resins were changed to ammonium ions with
10% TFA in CH2Cl2 (or toluene) and then excess TFA was
washed with CH2Cl2 (or toluene). A sufficient quantity of
the sample in CH2Cl2 (or toluene) was charged to the
+
ArgoPore-NH3 ·CF3COO– column and then the column was
washed with the same solvent to remove the excess sample.
Compound 8 adsorbed in the column was then eluted with
CH2Cl2–MeOH (1:1). The maximum adsorption of 8 was
determined to be 138 mg (6.9% to amino groups) in toluene
and 58.4 mg (2.9% to amino groups) in CH2Cl2.
(8) Fukase, K.; Tanaka, H.; Torii, S.; Kusumoto, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 389.
Synlett 2005, No. 15, 2342–2346 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York