alkyne to give a charge-separated intermediate followed by an
attack on the isocyanide group.7
In summary, we have succeeded in the synthesis of heteromet-
allacyclic niobocenes through reactions between a phosphido–
isocyanide derivative and electron-deficient alkynes. These results
open a different way to prepare new types of heteroniobacycle.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Di-
reccio´n General de Investigacio´n Cient´ıfica Spain (MEC Grant.
No.BQU2002-04638-CO2-02) and the Junta de Comunidades de
Castilla-La Mancha (Grant. N◦ PAC-02-003, GC-02-010, PBI05-
23 and PBI-05-029).
Notes and references
‡ Crystallographic data: C41H49NNbO2PSi2·1.5(C6H5Me), triclinic, space
¯
˚
group P1, a = 10.7939(5), b = 12.2093(6), c = 19.3334(9) A, a = 93.144(3),
◦
3
˚
b = 102.049(3), c = 108.324(3) , V = 2345.4(2) A , Z = 2, Dc
=
1.281 g cm−3, k(Mo-Ka) = 0.71073 A, l(Mo-Ka) = 0.382 mm−1, T =
100(2) K. X8 Appex II CCD diffractometer, graphite monochromator,
9067 unique reflections, R = 0.0494, Rw = 0.1338. Toluene groups
were located in disordered positions. CCDC reference number 294817.
For crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI:
10.1039/b517307h
˚
Fig. 1 ORTEP diagram of 3 ◦with 40% probability ellipsoids. Selected
˚
bond lengths (A) and angles ( ): Nb1–C1, 2.305(4); Nb1–P1, 2.515(1);
P1–C2, 1.819(4); C1–C3, 1.515(5); C2–C3, 1.340(6); P1–Nb1–C1, 76.1(1);
Nb1–P1–C2, 103.7(1); Nb1–C1–C3, 117.0(3); P1–C2–C3, 116.7(3); C1–
C3–C2, 121.7(4). Hydrogen bond distances and angles: d(H57B · · · O1)a =
1 E. Hey-Hawkins, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 1661.
2.473 A; d(C57 · · · O1) = 3.117(5) A; ∠C57–H57B · · · O1 = 124.3◦.
a
a
˚
˚
2 Selected references: (a) G. Bonnet, J.-C. Leblanc and C. Moise,
New J. Chem., 1988, 12, 551; (b) G. I. Nikonov, L. G. Kuzmina, P.
Mountford and D. A. Lemenovskii, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 3588;
(c) G. I. Nikonov, D. A. Lemenovskii and J. Lorberth, Organometallics,
1994, 13, 3127.
b
d(H86 · · · O1)b = 2.453 A; d(C86 · · · O1) = 3.30(1) A; ∠C86–H86 · · ·
˚
˚
◦
O1b = 152.1 . d(H65 · · · O2)c = 2.704 A; d(C65 · · · O2) = 3.22 (1) A;
c
˚
˚
c
d
d
˚
∠C65–H65 · · · O2 = 115.9. d(H72 · · · O2) = 2.898 A; d(C72 · · · O2) =
◦
d
a
b
˚
3.75(1) A; ∠C72–H72 · · · O2 = 153.1 . Symmetry operations: x, y, z; x,
3 (a) A. Antin˜olo, I. del Hierro, M. Fajardo, S. Garcia-Yuste, A. Otero, O.
Blacque, M. M. Kubicki and J. Amaudrut, Organometallics, 1996, 15,
1966; (b) A. Antin˜olo, F. Carrillo-Hermosilla, M. Fajardo, S. Garc´ıa-
Yuste, M. Lanfranchi, A. Otero, M. A. Pellinghelli, S. Prashar and E.
Villasen˜or, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 5507.
y, z − 1; c1 − x, 2 − y, 2 − z; dx, 1 + y, z.
4 (a) A. Antin˜olo, F. Carrillo-Hermosilla, S. Garcia-Yuste and A. Otero,
Organometallics, 1994, 13, 2719; (b) C. Alonso, A. Antin˜olo, F. Carrillo-
Hermosilla, P. Carrion, A. Otero, J. Sancho and E. Villasen˜or, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem., 2004, 220, 285; (c) A. Antin˜olo, I. Lopez-Solera, A.
Otero, S. Prashar, A. M. Rodriguez and E. Villasen˜or, Organometallics,
2002, 21, 2460.
5 A. Antin˜olo, I. del Hierro, M. Fajardo, A. Otero and Y. Mugnier,
Organometallics, 1997, 16, 4161.
6 (a) I. del Hierro, R. Fernandez-Galan, S. Prashar, A. Antin˜olo, M.
Fajardo, A. M. Rodr´ıguez and A. Otero, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003,
2438; (b) A. Antin˜olo, R. Fernandez-Galan, B. Gallego, A. Otero, S.
Prashar and A. M. Rodr´ıguez, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 2626.
7 (a) M. T. Ashby and J. H. Enemark, Organometallics, 1987, 6, 1323;
(b) M. T. Ashby and J. H. Enemark, Organometallics, 1987, 6, 1318;
(c) H. Adams, N. A. Bailey, A. N. Day and M. J. Morris, J. Organomet.
Chem., 1991, 407, 247; (d) L. Cuesta, E. Hevia, D. Morales, J. Perez, V.
Riera, M. Seitz and D. Miguel, Organometallics, 2005, 24, 177.
8 A. Antin˜olo, F. Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. Fe´rnandez-Baeza, S. Garc´ıa-
Yuste, A. Otero, J. Sa´nchez-Prada and E. Villasen˜or, Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem., 2000, 1437.
9 S. G. Bott, D. M. Hoffman and S. P. Rangarajan, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans., 1996, 1979.
10 A. Antin˜olo, M. Fajardo, R. Gil-Sanz, C. Lo´pez-Mardomingo, P.
Martin Villa, A. Otero, M. M. Kubicki, Y. Mugnier, S. E. Krami and
Y. Mourad, Organometallics, 1993, 12, 381.
Scheme 2
bond, which subsequently undergoes ring closure by coordination
of the phosphine group.
The behaviour of isocyanide towards metal–carbon bonds in
alkyl transition-metal complexes is well documented and insertion
reactions are usually observed.12 This type of reactivity has been
described by some of us in niobocene complexes.6a Attempts to
characterize some of the proposed intermediates by NMR studies
were unsuccessful. However, other alternative proposals can not
be ruled out—e.g., through a concerted transition state or by initial
nucleophilic attack by the phosphido on the electron-deficient
11 A. Antin˜olo, S. Garc´ıa-Yuste, A. Otero and R. Reguillo, unpublished
results.
12 E. Singleton and H. E. Oosthuizen, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 1983, 22,
209.
1496 | Dalton Trans., 2006, 1495–1496
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
©