H. M. Ragab et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 4283–4286
4285
compounds were of particular interest because of their
known lack of affinity for a4b2 receptors8 and, had they
shown affinity, might have been selective for a7
receptors.
bind with about three times the affinity of their phenyl-
ethyl counterparts 4f and 5e, respectively. Furthermore,
although the presence of the pyridyl nitrogen atom was
found unnecessary for a7 binding, the pyridyl series
seems to bind with 2- to 3-fold higher affinity than the
phenyl series (compare 2 with 5b, 4f with 5e, and 4g with
5f). Interestingly, neither the phenylethyl nor the phenyl-
ethenyl analogs of AXPQ (2), 4f and 4g, respectively, dis-
played higher affinity than AXPQ itself.
R
R
N
N
CH3
CH3
N
NH-CH3
N
N
6c R = H
6d R = CH3
6a R = H
6b R = CH3
6e
Compound 5f differs in structure from choline ether F3
(3) only in that the latter possesses a methyl group a to
the terminal amine, yet 5f binds with >35-fold lower
affinity than that reported for 3. The affinity of 5f at a7
receptors was re-determined and found (Ki = 2.03
0.2 lM) to be comparable to the result shown in Table
1. Evidently, the a-methyl group of 3 might play a major
role in its higher affinity for a7 receptors. Consistent with
this concept, Gotti et al.7 have shown that moving this
methyl group to the adjacent chain position is detrimen-
tal to binding. Future studies might wish to retain this
substituent. In addition, it is rather interesting that
AXPQ (2) binds with several-fold higher affinity at a7
receptors than either its phenylethyl or phenylethenyl
counterparts 4f and 4g, respectively; because AXPQ
binds with such high affinity at a4b2 receptors
(Ki = 0.0005 lM; 560-fold a4b2 vs a7 selectivity), the
phenylethenyl group of 3 might contribute to its selectiv-
ity for a7 receptors. Finally, although the 3-pyridyl
substituted analogs tended to display several-fold higher
affinity than their phenyl counterparts for a7 receptors,
the presence of the pyridyl nitrogen atom is known to
be important for a4b2 binding; hence, the absence of this
feature in F3 (3) might additionally contribute to its
selectivity for a7 versus a4b2 receptors, and it might be
profitable to continue targeting phenyl rather than pyr-
idyl analogs to achieve enhanced a7 selectivity.
The simple secondary and tertiary (i.e., N-methyl and
N,N-dimethyl) amine derivatives of AXPQ (2) also
failed to bind at a7 receptors (4a and 4b; Ki > 10 lM;
Table 1). Extension of the N-methyl group of 4b to an
N-ethyl group likewise resulted in a compound with
low affinity (i.e., 4c; Ki > 10 lM). However, AXPQ
itself (2; Ki = 0.28 lM) displayed twice the affinity of
(À)-nicotine (Ki = 0.75 lM). Similar findings were ob-
tained with phenyl counterparts 5a and 5b; that is, the
N,N-dimethyl tertiary amine 5a (Ki > 10 lM) failed to
bind, whereas the quaternary amine 5b displayed en-
hanced affinity (Ki = 1.10 lM). Evidently, higher affinity
is associated with a quaternary amine in both series.
Nevertheless, there must also be a chain-length require-
ment because the n-propoxy counterpart of 2 lacked
appreciable affinity (7;6 Ki > 10 lM).
CH3
O
N CH3
CH3
N
7
It might be noted that while our work was in progress
Gundisch et al.14 reported that 5b binds at a7 receptors
¨
with Ki ꢀ 0.2 lM. Possible explanations for the nearly
6-fold difference in affinity are that the published study
employed [3H]MLA rather than [125I]iodo-MLA as
radioligand, and used rat forebrain rather than rat
cerebral cortical homogenates.
Since this work was initiated, several investigative
groups have identified novel a7 nACh receptor ligands
that bind in the nanomolar range.15–17 Nevertheless,
we have extended the findings of Gotti et al.7 on the
binding of aryloxyalkylamines to a7 nACh receptors
by providing additional structure–affinity data, and
have shown that 6-PEN (1) and AXPQ (2) lack signifi-
cant affinity for a7 nACh receptors relative to their
affinity for a4b2 receptors.
Introduction of a 6-(2-phenylethyl) group had no appar-
ent effect on the affinity of 4b or 5a (4d and 5c, respec-
tively; Ki > 10 lM). Likewise, their phenylethenyl
counterparts 4e and 5d (Ki > 10 lM) lacked affinity for
a7 receptors. Again, affinity seems to be associated only
with the quaternary amines. The N,N,N-trimethyl
quaternary amine counterpart of 4d (i.e., 4f; Ki =
4.32 lM) and 5b (i.e., 5e; Ki = 7.50 lM) showed en-
hanced affinity (Table 1). The corresponding phenyl-
ethenyl quaternary analogs 4g (Ki = 1.25 lM) and 5f
(Ki = 2.17 lM) displayed about 3-fold enhanced affinity
both in the pyridyl and phenyl series.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by DA 05274. H.M.R.
was supported by the Channel Program through the
Egyptian Cultural Bureau.
References and notes
The results of this structure–affinity investigation indi-
cate that the quaternary amine nature of both the pyridyl
(i.e., 4) and phenyl (i.e., 5) series is a major determinant
of affinity; N-methyl secondary amines and N,N-dimeth-
yl tertiary amines bind with reduced affinity. The results
also show that the phenylethenyl compounds 4g and 5f
1. Glennon, R. A. Prog. Med. Chem. 2004, 42, 55.
2. Martin, L. F.; Kem, W. R.; Freedman, R. Psychophar-
macology 2004, 174, 54.
3. Summers, K. L.; Kem, W. R.; Giacobini, E. Jpn. J.
Pharmacol. 1997, 74, 139.