A. Miyazaki et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 6199–6201
6201
9. Keri, G.; Mezo, I.; Vadasz, Z.; Horvath, A.; Idei, M.; Vantus, T.; Balogh, A.;
Bokonyi, G.; Bajor, T.; Teplan, I.; Tamas, J.; Mak, M.; Horvath, J.; Csuka, O. Pept.
Res. 1993, 6, 281.
10. Keri, G.; Erchegyi, J.; Horvath, A.; Mezo, I.; Idei, M.; Vantus, T.; Balogh, A.;
Vadasz, Z.; Bokonyi, G.; Seprodi, J.; Teplan, I.; Csuka, O.; Tejeda, M.; Gaai, D.;
Szegedi, Z.; Szende, B.; Roze, C.; Kalthoff, H.; Ullrich, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1996, 93, 12513.
11. Stetak, A.; Lankenau, A.; Vantus, T.; Csermely, P.; Ullrich, A.; Keri, G. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 285, 483.
12. Vantus, T.; Keri, G.; Krivickiene, Z.; Valius, M.; Stetak, A.; Keppens, S.; Csermely,
P.; Bauer, I. P.; Bokonyi, G.; Declercq, W.; Vandenabeele, P.; Merlevede, W.;
Vandenheede, R. J. Cell. Signal. 2001, 13, 717.
Their antiproliferative activities on A431 cells (human epithelial
tumor cells) and SW480 cells (human colon carcinoma cells) on
which the SSTRs are expressed were measured by 3-(4,5-dimethyl-
thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (Table
1).25 Each analogue was tested at concentrations of 10, 25, and
50 lM. TT-232 and cycloheximide, used as external standards as
a well known and efficient apoptosis inducer and cell proliferation
inhibitor were used as positive controls.
In comparison with the compounds containing Tyr (1 and 2),
the replacement by Dmt (3 and 4) or Phe (5 and 6) resulted in a se-
vere or total loss of antiproliferative activity on A431 cells.
Although Dmt-containing opioid peptides and opioidomimetics
showed enhanced opioid receptor affinity and biological activity,
the decreased antiproliferative activity in the current study indi-
cates that the structures of the binding site of these receptors are
quite different from those of opioid receptors in spite of comprising
the same G protein-coupled receptor family. The hydrophobicity of
compounds were measured by RP-HPLC and the result was Phe (5
and 6) > Dmt (3 and 4) > Tyr (1 and 2) (data not shown). The more
hydrophobic compounds had almost no activity, though the li-
gand–receptor interaction might be activated by hydrophobicity.
On the other hand, it may also be conjectured that Tyr interacts
with SSTRs through H bonding through the OH functionality. How-
ever, the binding site of SSTRs was not accommodated by the
added bulkiness of Dmt, unlike opioid receptors. On SW480 cells
the activities of all compounds were not much different, but the
compounds containing Tyr exhibited more potent activity as ex-
pected. The difference of potency between both cells might be
due to the number of SSTRs expressed on respective tumor cells
and the SSTRs subtype. These results suggest that the Tyr residue
in structure of the cyclic peptides 1 and 2 is crucial for antitumor
activity.
13. Rohrer, S. P.; Birzin, E. T.; Mosley, R.; Berk, S. C.; Hutchins, S.; Shen, D. M.;
Xiong, Y.; Hayes, E.; Parmar, R.; Foor, F.; Mitra, S.; Degrado, S.; Shu, M.; Klopp,
J.; Cai, S. J.; Blake, A.; Chan, W. W. S.; Pasternak, A.; Yang, L.; Patchett, A.; Smith,
R.; Chapman, K.; Schaffer, J. Science 1998, 282, 737.
14. Jinsmaa, Y.; Miyazaki, A.; Fujita, Y.; Li, T.; Fujisawa, Y.; Shiotani, K.; Tsuda, Y.;
Yokoi, T.; Ambo, A.; Sasaki, Y.; Bryant, D. S.; Lazarus, H. L.; Okada, Y. J. Med.
Chem. 2004, 47, 2599.
15. Jinsmaa, Y.; Okada, Y.; Tsuda, Y.; Shiotani, K.; Sasaki, Y.; Ambo, A.; Bryant, D. S.;
Lazarus, H. L. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 309, 432.
16. Miyazaki, A.; Yokoi, T.; Tachibana, Y.; Enomoto, R.; Lee, E.; Bokonyi, G.; Keri, G.;
Tsuda, Y.; Okada, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6323.
17. Freidinger, M. R.; Perlow, S. D.; Randall, C. W.; Saperstein, R.; Arison, H. B.;
Veder, F. D. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1984, 23, 142.
18. Shiotani, K.; Li, T.; Miyazaki, A.; Tsuda, Y.; Bryant, D. S.; Ambo, A.; Sasaki, Y.;
Lazarus, H. L.; Okada, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 5793.
19. Igarashi, K.; Murabayashi, Y.; Hotta, K.; Kitamura, Y.; Kasuya, F.; Shiotani, K.; Li,
T.; Miyazaki, A.; Tsuda, Y.; Okada, Y.; Fukushima, S. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 806,
53.
20. Salvadori, S.; Attila, M.; Balboni, G.; Bianchi, C.; Bryant, S. D.; Crescenzi, O.;
Guessiini, R.; Picone, D.; Tancredi, T.; Temussi, P. A.; Lazarus, L. H. Mol. Med.
1995, 1, 678.
21. Lazarus, L. H.; Bryant, S. D.; Cooper, P. S.; Guerrini, R.; Balboni, G.; Salvadori, S.
Drug Discovery Today 1998, 3, 284.
22. Bryant, S. D.; Salvadori, S.; Cooper, P. S.; Lazarus, L. H. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
1999, 19, 42.
23. Dygos, J. H.; Yonan, E. E.; Scaros, M. G.; Goodmonson, O. J.; Getman, D. P.;
Periana, R. A.; Beck, G. R. Synthesis 1992, 741.
24. Physicochemical data of compounds 3–6. c{[Lys-Glu]-Dmt-
D
-Trp-Lys}ꢀHCl (3):
Yield 41.6 mg (78.0%), amorphous, [
a
]
D
25 +121° (c 1.0, H2O), Rf 0.71 (n-butanol/
AcOH/pyridine/H2O = 4:1:1:2), TOF-MS m/z: Calcd [M+H]+. 741.9. Found:
741.9. Anal. Calcd for C40H53ClN8O6ꢀ4H2O: C, 56.6; H, 7.24; N, 13.2. Found. C,
56.6; H, 6.86; N, 13.5. 1H NMR (500 MHz, dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO-d6)) d
10.7 (1H, s), 9.08 (1H, s), 8.23 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.97 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.88
(1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.73 (2H, br), 7.69 (1H, t, J = 7.1 Hz), 7.54 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz),
7.32 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.06 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.00–6.98 (2H, m), 6.36 (2H, s),
4.64 (1H, q-like, J = 7.9 Hz), 4.53 (1H, q-like, J = 7.7 Hz), 4.00 (1H, td, J = 14 and
8.4 Hz), 3.17 (1H, dq, J = 15 and 7.2 Hz), 2.85–2.78 (3H, m), 2.75–2.58 (6H, m),
2.58–2.37 (3H, m), 2.25–2.20 (1H, m), 2.18 (6H, s), 2.12 (3H, s), 1.55–1.45 (2H,
In conclusion, the newly designed and synthesized somato-
statin analogues contained the cyclic conformation due to a pyraz-
inone ring and the biologically essential amino acid sequence in
TT-232. Their antiproliferative activities were tested on two differ-
ent tumor cell lines, which initially indicated that Tyr, rather than
the more hydrophobic residues Dmt or Phe, was an important ele-
ment. We conclude that the exhibition of antiproliferative activity
through SSTRs needs not only hydrophobicity, but also a Tyr resi-
m), 1.45–1.27 (4H, m), 1.25–1.15 (2H, m), 0.95–0.85 (2H, br).
25
c{[Glu-Lys]-Dmt-
D-Trp-Lys}ꢀHCl (4): Yield 26.5 mg (61.5%), amorphous, [a]
D
+85.8° (c 1.0, H2O), Rf 0.61 (n-butanol/AcOH/pyridine/H2O = 4:1:1:2), TOF-MS
m/z: Calcd [M+H]+. 741.9. Found: 741.7. Anal. Calcd for C40H53ClN8O6 3.5H2O:
C, 57.2; H, 7.19; N, 13.3. Found: C, 57.0; H, 6.89; N, 13.3. 1H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d6) d 10.7 (1H, s), 8.23 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 8.01 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.85
(1H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.74 (2H, br), 7.67 (1H, br), 7.55 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.31 (1H,
d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.05 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.97 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.94 (1H, d,
J = 2.0 Hz), 6.36 (2H, s), 4.78 (1H, br), 4.70 (1H, q-like, J = 7.7 Hz), 4.02 (1H, q-
like, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.64–3.55 (1H, m), 2.96–2.86 (1H, m), 2.85–2.72 (3H, m), 2.70–
2.61 (3H, m), 2.60–2.48 (3H, m), 2.54 (6H, s), 2.24–2.12 (2H, m), 1.89 (3H, s),
due. The three amino acid residues, Tyr-
D-Trp-Lys is surely useful
for the design of somatostatin analogues with antitumor activity,
and we intend to develop this sequence as core template.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by KAKENHI (17790026), by a
Grant-in-Aid (C) from Kobe Gakuin University, by NEXT ‘Academic
Frontier’ Project (2006), and in part by Hungarian Grants JAP-6/02,
OTKA 49478, 60197, Cell Kom Ret-06/2006, Tibor Vántus is a Bolyai
Postdoctoral Fellow of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
1.56–1.47 (1H, m), 1.46–1.32 (6H, m), 1.28–1.18 (1H, m), 1.08–0.94 (2H, m).
25
c{[Lys-Glu]-Phe-
D
-Trp-Lys}ꢀHCl (5): Yield 43.5 mg (61.7%), amorphous, [a]
D
+77.8° (c 1.0, H2O), Rf 0.65 (n-butanol/AcOH/pyridine/H2O = 4:1:1:2), TOF-MS
m/z: Calcd [M+H]+. 697.8. Found: 697.8. Anal. Calcd for C38H49ClN8O5 4H2O: C,
56.7; H, 7.13; N, 13.9. Found: C, 56.5; H, 7.03; N, 14.1. 1H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d6) d 10.8 (1H, s), 8.48 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 8.24 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.83
(1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.75 (2H, br), 7.69 (2H, br), 7.33 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.17 (1H,
d, J = 1.6 Hz), 7.12–7.05 (4H, m), 7.01 (1H, t, J = 7.5Hz), 6.93 (2H, d-like,
J = 6.7 Hz), 4.63–4.54 (2H, m), 4.12 (1H, dt, J = 8.5 and 5.7 Hz), 3.17 (1H, m),
3.02 (1H, dd, J = 14 and 5.4 Hz), 2.93 (1H, m), 2.86–2.75 (2H, m), 2.74–2.65 (3H,
m), 2.57–2.37 (5H, m), 2.24 (1H, s), 2.10 (3H, s), 1.60–1.41 (5H, m), 1.40–1.30
References and notes
1. Brazeau, P.; Vale, W.; Burgus, R.; Ling, N.; Butcher, M.; Rivier, J.; Guillemin, R.
Science 1973, 179, 77.
2. Reichilin, S. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983, 309, 1556.
3. Buscail, L.; Delesque, N.; Esteve, J. P.; Saint-Laurent, N.; Prats, H.; Clerc, P.;
Robberecht, P.; Bell, G. I.; Liebow, C.; Schally, A. V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1994, 91, 2315.
4. Breader, C. D.; Yamada, Y. Y.; Yasuda, K.; Seino, S.; Saper, C. B.; Bell, G. I. J.
Neurosci. 1992, 12, 3920.
5. Bruno, J. F.; Xu, Y.; Song, J.; Berelowitz, M. Endocrinology 1993, 133, 2561.
6. Bauer, W.; Briner, U.; Doepfner, W.; Haller, R.; Huguenin, R.; Marbach, P.;
Petcher, T. Life Sci. 1982, 31, 1133.
7. Cai, R. Z.; Szoke, B.; Lu, R.; Fu, D.; Redding, T. W.; Schally, A. V. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1986, 83, 1896.
(2H, m), 1.25 (1H, m), 1.07 (2H, m).
25
c{[Glu-Lys]-Phe-
D
-Trp-Lys}ꢀHCl (6): Yield 45.5 mg (57.3%), amorphous, [a]
D
+41.9° (c 1.0, H2O), Rf 0.48 (n-butanol/AcOH/pyridine/H2O = 4:1:1:2), TOF-MS
m/z: Calcd [M+H]+. 697.8. Found: 697.5. Anal. Calcd for C38H49ClN8O5ꢀ3H2O: C,
58.0; H, 7.04; N, 14.2. Found: C, 57.9; H, 6.78; N, 14.5. 1H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d6) d 10.7 (1H, s), 8.23 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 8.01 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.85
(1H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.74 (2H, br), 7.67 (1H, br), 7.55 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.31 (1H,
d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.05 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.97 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.94 (1H, d,
J = 2.0 Hz), 6.36 (2H, s), 4.78 (1H, br), 4.70 (1H, q-like, J = 7.7 Hz), 4.02 (1H, q-
like, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.64–3.55 (1H, m), 2.96–2.86 (1H, m), 2.85–2.72 (3H, m), 2.70–
2.61 (3H, m), 2.60–2.48 (3H, m), 2.54 (6H, s), 2.24–2.12 (2H, m), 1.89 (3H, s),
1.56–1.47 (1H, m), 1.46–1.32 (6H, m), 1.28–1.18 (1H, m), 1.08–0.94 (2H, m).
25. Mosmann, T. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55.
8. Kaupmann, K.; Bruns, C.; Raulf, F.; Weber, H. P.; Mattes, H.; Lubbert, H. EMBO J.
1995, 14, 727.