610 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2007, Vol. 50, No. 4
Letters
(4) Carini, F.; Guelfi, M.; Lecci, A.; Tramontana, M.; Meini, S.; Giuliani,
S.; Montserrat, X.; Pascual, J.; Fabbri, G.; Ricci, R.; Quartara, L.;
Maggi, C. A. Cardiovascular effects of peptide kinin B2 receptor antag-
onists in rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2002, 80 (4), 310-322.
(5) Pesquero, J. B.; Araujo, R. C.; Heppenstall, P. A.; Stucky, C. L.;
Silva, J. A., Jr.; Walther, T.; Oliveira, S. M.; Pesquero, J. L.; Paiva,
A. C. M.; Calixto, J. B.; Lewin, G. R.; Bader, M. Hypoalgesia and
altered inflammatory responses in mice lacking kinin B1 receptors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97 (14), 8140-8145.
(6) Ferreira, J.; Beirith, A.; Mori, M. A. S.; Araujo, R. C.; Bader, M.;
Pesquero, J. B.; Calixto, J. B. Reduced nerve injury-induced
neuropathic pain in kinin B1 receptor knock-out mice. J. Neurosci.
2005, 25 (9), 2405-2412.
because the hB1 binding assay did not differentiate between
analogs 24, 26, and 28, the danger of overinterpretation exists.
There was a significant difference between the cyclic and the
acylic analogs (i.e., 26 and 4, vide supra), and therefore, the
change in BFE for tetralin 26 relative to 4 is significant
(∆BFE26F(4) ) BFE26 - BFE4 ) 3.7 kcal mol-1). The entropy
term of ∆BFE26F(4) was -0.6 kcal mol-1 (T∆S38F(a) - T∆S35F(a)
)
or about 20% of the 550-fold gain in affinity. While relevant
to SAR pertaining to bond “a”, the value for T∆S35F(a)
underestimates the total entropic effect because it does not
include the contributions due to bond “b” (Figure 2). Taking
(7) Sharma, J. N.; Buchanan, W. W. Pathogenic responses of bradykinin
system in chronic inflammatory rheumatoid disease. Exp. Toxicol.
Pathol. 1994, 46 (6), 421-33.
into account both bonds afforded T∆S35F(a,b) ) 2.3 kcal mol-1
,
which decreased the change in entropy for 35 f 38 to -1.1
kcal mol-1 (∆(T∆S38F(a,b)) ) T∆S38F(a) - T∆S35F(a,b)). To put
the numbers into perspective, a 1.1 kcal mol-1 decrease in
entropy corresponds to an ∼7-fold increase in affinity; it is not
the major factor behind the 550-fold gain. Enthalpy (∆∆H26F(4)),
on the other hand, accounted for 2.6 kcal mol-1 of the 3.7 kcal
(8) Hess, J. F.; Ransom, R. W.; Zeng, Z.; Chang, R. S. L.; Hey, P. J.;
Warren, L.; Harrell, C. M.; Murphy, K. L.; Chen, T.-B.; Miller, P.
J.; Lis, E.; Reiss, D.; Gibson, R. E.; Markowitz, M. K.; DiPardo, R.
M.; Su, D.-S.; Bock, M. G.; Gould, R. J.; Pettibone, D. J. Generation
and characterization of a human bradykinin receptor B1 transgenic
rat as a pharmacodynamic model J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004,
310 (2), 488-497.
(9) Gougat, J.; Ferrari, B.; Sarran, L.; Planchenault, C.; Poncelet, M.;
Maruani, J.; Alonso, R.; Cudennec, A.; Croci, T.; Guagnini, F.;
Urban-Szabo, K.; Martinolle, J.-P.; Soubrie, P.; Finance, O.; Le Fur,
G. SSR240612 [(2R)-2-[((3R)-3-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-3-{[(6-meth-
oxy-2-naphthyl)sulfonyl]amino}propanoyl)amino]-3-(4-{[2R,6S)-2,6-
dimethylpiperidinyl]methyl}phenyl)-N-isopropyl-N-methylpropan-
amide hydrochloride], a new nonpeptide antagonist of the bradykinin
B1 receptor: Biochemical and pharmacological characterization J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 309 (2), 661-669.
(10) Wood, M. R.; Kim, J. J.; Han, W.; Dorsey, B. D.; Homnick, C. F.;
DiPardo, R. M.; Kuduk, S. D.; MacNeil, T.; Murphy, K. L.; Lis, E.
V.; Ransom, R. W.; Stump, G. L.; Lynch, J. J.; O’Malley, S. S.;
Miller, P. J.; Chen, T.-B.; Harrell, C. M.; Chang, R. S. L.; Sandhu,
P.; Ellis, J. D.; Bondiskey, P. J.; Pettibone, D. J.; Freidinger, R. M.;
Bock, M. G. Benzodiazepines as potent and selective bradykinin B1
antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46 (10), 1803-1806.
(11) Su, D.-S.; Markowitz, M. K.; DiPardo, R. M.; Murphy, K. L.; Harrell,
C. M.; O’Malley, S. S.; Ransom, R. W.; Chang, R. S. L.; Ha, S.;
Hess, F. J.; Pettibone, D. J.; Mason, G. S.; Boyce, S.; Freidinger, R.
M.; Bock, M. G. Discovery of a potent, nonpeptide bradykinin B1
receptor antagonist. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (25), 7516-7517.
(12) Marceau, F. A possible common pharmacophore in the nonpeptide
antagonists of the bradykinin B1 receptor. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
2005, 26 (3), 116-118.
mol-1 increase in ∆BFE26F(4) (∆∆H26F(4) ) ∆BFE26F(4)
+
∆(T∆S38F(a,b))). The presence of favorable enthalpic interactions
(e.g., Van der Waals) between the atoms required to make the
cycle (X-Y, Figure 2) and the receptor are the primary factor
underlying the affinity gain between acyclic 4 (Ki ) 132 nM)
and cyclic 26 (Ki ) 0.24 nM). Decreased conformational
flexibility, while significant, contributed ∼30% of the BFE
difference between the two molecules.
In summary, chroman 28 was identified as a potent B1-
selective antagonist with in vitro activity across multiple species
and anti-inflammatory activity in vivo. A computational study
suggested that while decreased conformational entropy cor-
related with increased affinity, favorable enthalpic interactions
between the atoms required to make the molecule more rigid
and the receptor accounted for the 550-fold affinity enhancement
(4 f 26). Finally, it should be noted that potent hB1 antagonists
occupied conformation I (Figure 2, æ ) -105 ( 25°) >90%
of the time. It seems likely that this orientation lies close to the
receptor-preferred binding conformation.
(13) Cannon, J. G. Analog design. In Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry and
Drug DiscoVery, 5th ed.; Wolff, M. E., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons,
Inc.: New York, 1995; Vol. 1: Principles and Practice, pp 788-
791.
(14) Corey, E. J.; Bakshi, R. K.; Shibata, S. Highly enantioselective borane
reduction of ketones catalyzed by chiral oxazaborolidines. Mechanism
and synthetic implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109 (18), 5551-
5553.
Acknowledgment. The authors express our gratitude to M.
P. Seed, S. K. McMaster, and D. A. Willoughby for conducting
the in vivo assays. Additionally, the reviewer’s comments were
helpful, thought-provoking, and very much appreciated.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed biological meth-
ods and results, synthetic experimentals, and computational data
and methodologies (61 pages). This material is available free of
(15) Lautens, M.; Rovis, T. Selective functionalization of 1,2-dihydro-
naphthalenols leads to a concise, stereoselective synthesis of sertra-
line. Tetrahedron 1999, 55 (29), 8967-8976.
(16) Flack, H. D. On enantiomorph-polarity estimation. Acta Crystallogr.,
Sect. A 1983, A39 (6), 876-81.
(17) Shannon, C. E. Prediction and entropy. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1951, 50-
64.
References
(1) Dray, A.; Perkins, M. Bradykinin and inflammatory pain. Trends
Neurosci. 1993, 16 (3), 99-104.
(18) Sundaram, K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; MacElroy, R. D. Information
contained in protein shapes. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1983, 21, 107-
117.
(19) Viswanadhan, V. N.; Mattice, W. L. Assessment of bond rotation
interdependence in polymer chains: An information theory approach.
Macromolecules 1987, 20, 685-688.
(2) Proud, D.; Kaplan, A. P. Kinin formation: Mechanisms and role in
inflammatory disorders. Annu. ReV. Immunol. 1988, 6 (1), 49-83.
(3) Carini, F.; Guelfi, M.; Lecci, A.; Tramontana, M.; Meini, S.; Giuliani,
S.; Montserrat, X.; Pascual, J.; Fabbri, G.; Ricci, R.; Quartara, L.;
Maggi, C. A. Cardiovascular effects of peptide kinin B2 receptor antag-
onists in rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2002, 80 (4), 310-322.
JM061224G