evaluated. The unsaturated amide 4and the unfunctionalized
alkene 5 were found to be either unreactive or nonselective
under a variety of reduction conditions. The asymmetric
hydrogenation of tetrasubstituted quinolinium salts of type
II was unprecedented. However, the potential of assembling
the quinolinium salt in a single step coupled to an enantio-
selective hydrogenation made this route a very attractive
target for study.
NADH-type redox process, producing equal quantities of
8a and 9.9,10 Several oxidants were tested for their potential
to compete with III, but most gave only modest improve-
ments in overall conversion. A previous report indicated
catalytic iodine alonecould effectthistransformation, with
air as a stoichiometric oxidant.8c Applying this protocol to
7 led predominantly to iodination of the aromatic ring,
with no product formation.11 To redirect oxidation, we
considered deactivation of the aromatic ring by protona-
tion withacid prior tothe addition of iodine. To that effect,
the addition of HI prior to iodine not only led to inhibition
of ring iodination, observing only trace amounts of 9, the
modified conditions also affected conversion of 7 to 8b at
substantially lower temperature (30°C). Consequently, the
quinolinium salt 8b was accessed in 89% isolated yield
using this new, one-pot annulation/elimination/oxidation
MCR sequence.12
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Routes to Vabicaserin (1)
The enantioselective reduction of highly substituted
heterocycles, such as quinolines or pyridines, remains an
elusive target in an active field of research. While there are
a variety of methods described for highly selective asym-
metric reduction of 2-substituted quinolines, there are only
two reports describing substrates with substitution at
the 3-position and no reports with substitution at the 4-
or 8-positions.13 Further, while many of the prescribed
protocols invoke N-activation, there are no examples of
N-alkylquinolinium salts as substrates for asymmetric
hydrogenation. Consequently, we were not surprised to
find that applying the current state of the art reaction
conditions to highly substituted 8, or model substrates
thereof, resulted in little or no enantioselectivity. The most
promising lead came from the use of the phosphoramidite-
iridium catalyst system described by de Vries and Feringa,
in which we observed low reactivity and modest enantios-
electivity (Figure 1, Table 1, entries 2ꢀ4).13h Analogous to
the findings of de Vries and Feringa, a mixed ligand system
Assembly of a quinolinium salt II directly from a derivative
of readily available benzodiazepine 65 was initially envisioned
to occur through an economical multicomponent reaction
(MCR) with components at the targeted oxidation state.6
However, all attempts to produce structures of type II with
benzodiazepine derivatives in the absence of oxidants were
unsuccessful.7 We then considered a more complex, oxidative
MCR sequence, which required annulation, elimination, and
oxidation all occurring in the same pot.8
The substrate selected for the oxidative MCR study,
N-tosylbenzodiazepine 7, was obtained in 95% yield from
6 by treatment with p-TsCl and NaHCO3 in EtOAc
(Scheme 2). We were encouraged when the oxidative
MCR conditions developed by Kozlov were examined.8d
Accordingly, treating 7 with paraformaldehyde, cyclopen-
tanone, and triflic acid in n-butanol at 100 °C yielded the
desired quinolinium triflate 8a. However, an equal amount
of the N-methyl derivative 9 was also formed. We propose
the formation of 9 occurs through hydride transfer from
dihydroquinoline intermediateIVtoiminium ion III via an
(9) Meyers, A. I.; Stout, D. M. Chem. Rev. 1982, 82, 223.
(10) When the reaction was run using paraformaldehdye-d2, 9 was
formed with incorporation of three deuterium atoms (94% of theoretical)
and 8a with one deuterium atom, consistent with single deuterium transfer
from the intermediate hydroquinoline IV to the iminium ion III. For a related
example of an imine acting as an oxidant, see ref 8b.
(11) Iodination was not noted in ref 8c, although the authors indicate the
reaction was limited in scope to a single substrate, 2-aminonaphthalene.
(12) In this unoptimized process, an excess of cyclopentanone and
paraformaldedyde was used to drive the reaction to completion.
(5) Bergman, J.; Brynolf, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2979 and
references therein.
ꢀ
(6) For MCR reviews, see: (a) Toure, B. B.; Hall, D. G. Chem. Rev. 2009,
ꢀ
(13) For a recent review article, see: (a) Maj, A. M.; Suisse, I.; Meliet,
109, 4439. (b) Kumaravel, K.; Vasuki, G. Curr. Org. Chem. 2009,13, 1820. (c)
Martin, S. F.; Sunderhaus, J. D. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1300. (d) Ganem,
B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 463. (e) Zhu, J., Bienayame, H., Eds.
C.; Hardoin, C.; Agbossou-Neidercorn, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53,
4747. (b) Wang, D.-S.; Chen, Q.-A.; Lu, S.-M.; Zhou, Y.-G. Chem. Rev.
2012, 112, 2557. Representative examples: (c) Wang, T.-L.; Zhuo, L. G.;
Li, Z.-W.; Chen, F.; Ding, Z.-Y.; He, Y.-M.; Fan, Q.-H.; Xiang, J.-F.;
Yu, Z.-X.; Chan, A. S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9878. (d)
Dobereiner, G. E.; Nova, A.; Schley, N. D.; Hazari, N.; Miller, S.;
Eisenstein, O.; Crabtree, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7547. (e)
Tang, W.-J.; Tan, J.; Xu, L.-J.; Lam, K.-H.; Fan, Q.-H.; Chan Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1055. (f) Wang, D.-S.; Zhou, Y.-G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2010, 51, 3014. (g) Wang, C.; Li, C.; Wu, X.; Pettman, A.; Xiao, J.
ꢀ
Multicomponent Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005. Recemt examples
ꢀ
of MCR, see: (f) Bienayame, H.; Hulme, C.; Oddon, G.; Schmitt, P. Chem.;Eur.
J. 2000, 6, 3321. (g) Hutt, J. T.; Aron, D. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5256.
(7) Combinations of cyclopentanone with formate derivatives, such
as the Vilsmeier reagent or DMF dimethyl acetal, did not yield product.
Cyclopentanone-2-carboxaldehyde also did not yield the desired pro-
duct under a variety of conditions examined.
ꢁ ꢀ
(8) For recent examples of oxidative MCR, see: (a) Adib, M.;
Sheikhi, E.; Bijanzadeh, H. R. Synlett 2012, 23, 85. (b) Shindoh, N.;
Tokuyama, H.; Takemoto, Y.; Takasu, K. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7451.
(c) Wang, X-S; Li, Q.; Yao, C-S; T, S.-J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 3513.
(d) Kozlov, N. G.; Gusak, K. N. Russ. J. Org. Chem 2008, 44, 830. For
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6524. (h) Mrsic, N.; Lefort, L.; Boogers,
J. A. F.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L.; de Vries, J. G. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2008, 350, 1081. (i) Lu, S.-M.; Bolm, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008,
350, 1101. (j) Lu, S.-M.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Han, X.-W.; Zhou, Y.-G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2260. (k) Rueping, M.; Antonchick, A. P.;
Theissmann, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3683. (l) Wang, W.-B.;
Lu, S.-M.; Yang, P.-Y.; Han, X.-W.; Zhou, Y.-G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 10536. Example of quinoline N-oxide: (m) Gou, F.-R.; Li, W.;
Zhang, X.; Liang, Y.-M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2441.
ꢀ
oxidation of Povarov products, see: (e) Vicente-Garcıa, E.; Ramon, R.;
´
Preciado, S.; Lavilla, R. Multicomponent reaction access to complex
quinolines via oxidation of the Povarov adducts. Beilsein J. Org. Chem.
[Online] 2011, 7, 980, DOI:10.3762/bjoc.7.110 (accessed May 11, 2012).
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX