D. Carrasco and J.A. Casares
Inorganica Chimica Acta 517 (2021) 120206
formation of [ZnRfCl(THF)2] is particularly informative. Starting from 2
(Fig. 3) [ZnRfCl(THF)2] is formed very fast at the beginning of the re-
action, its concentration reaches a maximum and then gently declines.
The initial reaction rate of formation of ZnRfCl(THF)2 is not sensitive to
[PPh3], and it is possible to obtain a common value of about 1.8⋅10ꢀ 6
molLꢀ 1sꢀ 1 for all the experiments, however, the maximum concentra-
tion of [ZnRfCl(THF)2] increases with the concentration of phosphine.
The same behavior is obtained starting from complex trans-[PdRfMe
(PPh3)2] (3) (Fig. 4) although the formation of [ZnRfCl(THF)2] from the
trans isomer is about one order of magnitude slower than from the cis,
and as consequence of the isomerization 3 to 2, the formation of [ZnRfCl
(THF)2] do not stop as suddenly as when starting from 2. To explain this
behavior, the reactions shown in Scheme 5 were proposed.
Scheme 4. Retro-transmetalation products formed in the reaction between cis-
[PdRfMe(PPh3)2] (2) or trans-[PdRfMe(PPh3)2] (3) with [ZnCl2(THF)2] in THF.
The formation of cationic species [PdMeL3]+ induced by Lewis acids,
such as organozinc derivatives, has been demonstrated previously [42],
and is not unexpected in the presence of a strong acid as [ZnCl2(THF)2].
In an attempt to detect the formation of [PdMeL3]+, the reaction of cis-
[PdRfMe(PPh3)2] (2) with [ZnCl2(THF)2] in the presence of PPh3 was
stopped after one hour by cooling the solution to ꢀ 20 ◦C. The 19F
spectrum shows the partial conversion of 2 to trans-[PdRfMe(PPh3)2]
(3), and the formation of [ZnRfCl(THF)2]. Accordingly, the 31P{1H}
spectrum shows the presence of 2, 3 and also [PdMeL3]+, characterized
by its AX2 spin system, in an amount that matches the amount of [ZnRfCl
(THF)2] observed in the 19F NMR spectrum (Fig. 5).
3.1. Retro-transmetalation experiments
The reactions between cis-[PdRfMe(PPh3)2] (2) or trans-[PdRfMe
(PPh3)2] (3) with [ZnCl2(THF)2] were studied. These mixtures form an
exchange system in which, in addition to the known cis/trans-[PdRfMe
(PPh3)2] isomerization equilibrium,[41] other products are formed such
as [ZnRfCl(THF)2] (4) and minor amounts of the trans-[PdRfCl(PPh3)2]
(1) (Scheme 4), as well as small amounts of the reductive elimination
product RfMe. Transmetalation equilibria are shifted to the formation of
[PdRfMe(PPh3)2] and [ZnCl2(THF)2], so that the reactions required a
large excess of [ZnCl2(THF)2] to be studied. The formation of the com-
pound [PdCl2(PPh3)2] was not observed even under a large excess of
[ZnCl2(THF)2].
Thus, the reaction shown in equilibrium 3, removes [PdMeCl
(PPh3)2] from the reaction medium shifting equilibria 1 and 2 to the
right so that a larger amount of [ZnRfCl(THF)2] is produced for higher
concentrations of PPh3.
The main effect of the addition of [ZnCl2(THF)2] to 2 or 3 is on the
cis/trans isomerization rate. In Fig. 2 the experimental graphics of the
isomerization with [ZnCl2(THF)2] are compared to the reaction without
added [ZnCl2(THF)2] (simulated course from experimental kinetic pa-
rameters), showing that the isomerization from cis- to trans-[PdRfMe
(PPh3)2] is faster in the presence of [ZnCl2(THF)2]. Note that at equi-
librium both complexes reach a concentration that can be measured by
NMR, therefore the isomerization rate can be measured starting from
either the cis or from the trans isomer. It is also clear from the graphics
that, irrespectively of the chosen starting system, the fastest reaction is
the formation of [ZnRfCl(THF)2]. It is worth noting that an induction
period was observed for the isomerization process that is coincident with
the time required for the formation of the maximum amount of [ZnRfCl
(THF)2].
Scheme 5 also explains the increase on the isomerization rate between
2 and 3 in the presence of [ZnCl2(THF)2], that is implicit in equations 1
and 2, but does not explain satisfactorily the dependence on [PPh3] of the
isomerization rates: the formation of trans-[PdRfMe(PPh3)2] (3) when
starting from cis-[PdRfMe(PPh3)2] (2) (Fig. 3) or the formation of 2 when
starting from 3 (Fig. 4). The shape of these curves is a sigmoid suggesting
an induction period, coincident with the formation of [ZnRfCl(THF)2] (4).
To explain this behavior another isomerization route, catalyzed by
[ZnRfCl(THF)2] was proposed (Scheme 6). This reaction is similar to that
studied for the isomerization of 2 and 3 in the presence of ZnMe2, and
involves the substitution of one phosphine ligand by the incoming
[ZnRfCl(THF)2] [32]. During this reaction the aryl group is exchanged
between the organozinc and the organopalladium.
The experimental data fit nicely with this complex scheme (see
supplementary information) in a wide interval of values for Keq(4), the
values of k5 and Keq(5) being dependent on this parameter. Thus,
although a good qualitative interpretation of the results is possible, the
obtention of a complete energy profile for the reaction system is not
possible with a reasonable number of experiments.
The dependence of the reaction on the concentration of PPh3 is not
identical for the different species involved. Figs. 3 and 4 show the
concentration–time plots for the reactions between [ZnCl2(THF)2] with
cis-[PdRfMe(PPh3)2] (2) (Fig. 3) and [ZnCl2(THF)2] with trans-[PdRfMe
(PPh3)2] (3) (Fig. 4). The disappearance of the starting complex, 2 or 3 is
almost insensitive to the concentration of PPh3. However, the plots
showing the formation of [ZnRfCl(THF)2] and the isomerization product
on each case (3 and 2 respectively) change noticeably with [PPh3]. The
Another interesting feature of this set of experiments is the behavior
of the species trans-[PdRfCl(PPh3)2] (1). This product is formed very
Fig. 2. Concentration/time plots for the reactions: a) 3 + [ZnCl2(THF)2] ([3]0 = 0.0165 mol⋅Lꢀ 1, [ZnCl2(THF)2]0 = 0.66 mol⋅Lꢀ 1, and [PPh3]0 = 0.0165 mol⋅Lꢀ 1), b)
2 + [ZnCl2(THF)2] ([2]0 = 0.0165 mol⋅Lꢀ 1, [ZnCl2(THF)2]0 = 0.66 mol⋅Lꢀ 1 and [PPh3]0 = 0.0158 mol⋅Lꢀ 1), and c) Simulated cis- to trans-[PdRfMe(PPh3)2]
isomerization reaction with [PPh3]0 = 0.0165 mol⋅Lꢀ 1. The simulation was done by using the data taken from Ref. [41].
4