C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
stereoreinforcing relationship with the (Z)-olefin, whereas (S,E)-
homoallylic alcohol + 28 is also a matched double asymmetric
reaction but there is a non-stereoreinforcing relationship with the
(E)-olefin.
Overall, we report a titanium alkoxide-mediated reaction for
regio- and stereoselective cross-coupling of substituted olefins and
imines. The reported process provides convenient access to
substituted 1,5-aminoalcohols and piperidines. Our studies focusing
on simple diastereoselection have shown that this reaction is
stereoconvergent with respect to olefin stereochemistrysboth (E)-
and (Z)-disubstituted homoallylic alcohols provide anti-products
in coupling reactions with achiral imines. We have studied this
reaction in both single and double asymmetric modes, have defined
matched and mismatched double asymmetric relationships, and have
shown a reversal of stereochemical matching/mismatching as a
function of the olefin geometry of the chiral homoallylic alcohol.
Research focused on further understanding the nature of stereo-
selection in this cross-coupling reaction, as well as application to
the synthesis of complex heterocycles, is underway.
Figure 4. A model for stereoselection in the double asymmetric cross-
coupling reactions of disubstituted olefins with chiral imines.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge financial support
of this work by the American Cancer Society (RSG-06-117-01),
the American Chemical Society (PRF-45334-G1), the Arnold and
Mabel Beckman Foundation, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly &
Co., the National Institutes of Health, NIGMS (GM80266), and
Yale University.
76% yield (dr g 50:1), cyclization of which provided the 2,3-trans-
2,6-trans-tetrasubstituted piperidine 35 (entry 1a). Coupling of the
same homoallylic alcohol (33) with 28 proceeded with low
conversion (30%) and provided a mixture of diastereomeric products
(dr ) 4:1:1; entry 2a). Although the efficiency of this coupling
reaction can be increased on warming (entry 2b), the dr is affected.
The disparate reactivity and selectivity observed defines a clearly
matched (entry 1) and mismatched (entry 2) double asymmetric
relationship in these coupling reactions.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
tabulated spectroscopic data for new compounds (PDF). This material
References
The (E)-disubstituted homoallylic alcohol 38 displayed inverse
double asymmetric behavior as compared to (Z)-disubstituted
homoallylic alcohol 33. As illustrated in entries 3 and 4, coupling
of 38 with 28 represents a matched double asymmetric process (88%
yield, dr ) 35:4:1), whereas coupling of 38 with ent-28 represents
a mismatched double asymmetric reaction (dr ) 19:12:4:1).
A preliminary empirical model to explain these double asym-
metric reactions is proposed in Figure 4. The model is based on
(1) diastereoselective coordination of the pendent methyl ether to
the titanium center,10 (2) intramolecular delivery of the olefin to
the azametallacyclopropane,3-5 (3) minimization of 1,2-interactions
in the developing five-membered ring, and (4) positioning of the
alkyl group (R) outside of the developing cis-fused ring system.
The sum of these factors may contribute to defining matched double
asymmetric reactions for the synthesis of either 1,4-anti-1,5-syn
(34) or 1,4-syn-1,5-anti (36) aminoalcohols via transition-state
geometries G and H.7,8 On the basis of this empirical model, the
mismatched double asymmetric reactions (Table 3, entries 2 and
4) may suffer from the requirement of placing the alkyl substituent
(R) on the inside of the developing cis-fused ring system (I and J,
Figure 4).
These double asymmetric cross-coupling reactions proceed with
a great deal of variability in stereoselection that is dependent on
the stereochemical relationship of the secondary alcohol, imine,
and olefin. Interestingly, matched double asymmetric reactions can
provide stereoselective access to either the 1,4-anti-1,5-syn-1,5-
aminoalcohol or 1,4-syn-1,5-anti-1,5-aminoalcohol products and the
corresponding tetrasubstituted piperidines 35 and 37. The variability
in the diastereomeric ratio of products observed in each of these
matched double asymmetric coupling reactions is consistent with
a stereoreinforcing12 relationship based on olefin geometry: (S,Z)-
homoallylic alcohol + ent-28 is matched and benefits from a
(1) For cross-coupling of imines and alkynes, see: (Promoted by Zr) (a)
Buchwald, S. L.; Watson, B. T.; Wannamaker, M. W.; Dewan, J. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4486-4494. (b) Jensen, M.; Livinghouse, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4495-4496. (c) Brossman, R. B.; Davis,
W. M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2321-2322.
(Promoted by Ti): (d) Gao, Y.; Harada, K.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 5913-5916. (Catalyzed by Ni): (e) Patel, S. J.; Jamison, T. F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 1364-1367. (f) Patel, S. J.; Jamison,
T. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3941-3944. (Coupling of
conjugated alkynes with N-sulfinyliminoacetates catalyzed by Rh): (g)
Kong, J.-R.; Cho, C.-W.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
11269-11276.
(2) For cross-coupling of zirconium-imine complexes and terminal olefins,
see ref 1a.
(3) Ryan, J.; Micalizio, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2764-2764.
(4) Reichard, H. A.; Micalizio, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1440-
1443.
(5) McLaughlin, M.; Takahashi, M.; Micalizio, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2007, 46, in press.
(6) For an example of a related PPh3, CCl4-promoted cyclodehydration, see:
Song, Y. C.; Okamoto, S.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8635-
8637.
(7) The stereochemistry of the C-Ti bond in the proposed bicyclic azamet-
allacyclopentanes is not known.
(8) The coordination number of titanium in the transition states for these
carbometalation reactions is not known. The stereoselection observed can
be accounted for by assuming a transition-state structure for the generation
of a cis-fused bicyclo[3.3.0] metallacycle. Proposition of an azametalla-
cyclopentane intermediate is in accord with well-known reactivity patterns
of azametallacyclopropanes.
(9) For a nickel-catalyzed coupling of substituted 1,3-dienes to imines for
the synthesis of related 1,3-syn-functionalized products (i.e., 25), see:
Kimura, M.; Miyachi, A.; Kojima, K.; Tanaka, S.; Tamaru, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14360-14361.
(10) For examples of stereoselective alkyne-imine cross-coupling reactions
with chiral imine 28, see: (a) Fukuhara, K.; Okamoto, S.; Sato, F. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 2145-2148. (b) Ref 5.
(11) (a) Masamune, S.; Choy, W.; Petersen, J. S.; Sita, L. R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1-30. (b) For an example of triple asymmetric
synthesis, see: Duplantier, A. J.; Nantz, M. H.; Roberts, J. C.; Short, R.
P.; Somfai, P.; Masamune, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 7357-7360.
(12) Evans, D. A.; Dart, M. J.; Duffy, J. L.; Yang, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 4322-4343.
JA071974V
9
7516 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 24, 2007