Organic Letters
Letter
opening of N-carbobenzoxyaziridines with cysteine;4,8 (ii) ring
opening of cyclic sulfamidates with cysteine;9 and (iii) SN2
reactions of bromoalanine and β-methylcysteine.10 However,
each of the above methods have their drawbacks, which
present difficulties for their application in a large-scale
synthesis of β-methyllanthionine.
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions for
Nucleophilic Ring-Opening of 2a with 1a
a
For example, nucleophilic ring opening of N-carbobenzox-
yaziridines requires a large excess of BF3·OEt2 (4−8 equiv).
Furthermore, these reactions are typically sluggish (3−5 days),
and the yields are frequently poor (e.g., 12%−46%). The cyclic
sulfamidate method gives better yields, but it requires cleavage
of the intermediate sulfamic acid, involving the use of
propanethiol, after the nucleophilic ring-opening reaction.
Additionally, the preparation of the sulfamidate precursors
requires oxidative conditions that are not compatible with allyl
and alloc protecting groups. The bromoalanine route requires
multiple synthetic steps to prepare each of the reaction
partners, and some of these reactions are plagued by low
overall atom efficiencies. As a result, this method is also
unsuitable for large-scale synthesis. To facilitate the total
synthesis of mersacidin, we felt it was necessary to develop a
new method for an efficient and scalable synthesis of
orthogonally-protected ββ-MeLan derivatives.
entry
catalyst
solvent
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DABCO
ZnCl2
Ag(cod)2PF6
LiClO4
BiCl3
In(OTf)3
InBr3
InCl3
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
Et2O
0
0
0
0
20
0
36
52
b
9
10
11
InCl3
InCl3
InCl3
46
62
b
Et2O
56
a
b
1a (1 equiv), 2a (1 equiv), catalyst (1 equiv). InCl3 (30 mol %), 16
h
Direct construction of the carbon−sulfur bond in ββ-MeLan
through nucleophilic ring-opening of an orthogonally-pro-
tected N-carbobenzoxyaziridine with an orthogonally pro-
tected cysteine derivative is highly atom economical. More-
over, the preparation of the required cysteine- and aziridine-
derived reaction partners is concise and well-established.11
Various bases, as well as Lewis acids, have been successfully
applied for aziridine ring-opening reactions with carbon,
nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen, and halogen nucleophiles.12,13 To
the best of our knowledge, BF3·OEt2 is the only Lewis acid that
has ever been utilized in the attack of cysteine-derived
nucleophile on aziridine. However, as mentioned above,
since these reactions typically require large excesses of BF3·
OEt2, long reaction times, display intolerance toward acid
labile protecting groups, and proceed in relatively poor yields,
this reaction is unsuitable for large-scale synthesis of β-MeLan
derivatives. These liabilities led us to investigate the develop-
ment of an alternative method to enable an efficient and
scalable synthesis of β-MeLan derivatives via ring opening of
suitable protected aziridines by orthogonally-protected cys-
teine nucleophiles.
The protecting group on the aziridine nitrogen should be
electron-withdrawing in order to activate the aziridine toward
nucleophilic ring-opening. Given this limitation, our efforts
focused on use of the p-nitrobenzyloxycarbonyl (p-NO2-Cbz)
protecting group. Compared to the Cbz protecting group
frequently used in previously reported ββ-MeLan syntheses,
which is difficult to remove by catalytic hydrogenation due to
the presence of the sulfur atom, p-NO2-Cbz can be readily
removed via catalytic hydrogenation or via reductive cleavage
by sodium dithionite.14 Therefore, cysteine derivative 1a and
aziridine derivative 2a were chosen as model substrates for our
initial investigation seeking suitable Lewis acids or bases that
can facilitate the desired ring-opening reaction.
entry 8). When the reaction was performed in Et2O, the yield
improved to 62% (Table 1, entry 10). Based on the reaction
monitoring by TLC, the improved yield was attributed to
suppressed Boc protecting group cleavage when the reaction
was carried out in Et2O relative to DCM. A reduction of the
amount of InCl3 (Table 1, entries 9 and 11) resulted in
increased reaction times and increased product decomposition.
This trend was further exacerbated when catalytic amounts of
InCl3 were employed. Further experimentation revealed that 1
molar equiv of InCl3 in Et2O at room temperature provided
the optimal conditions for the desired aziridine ring-opening
reaction.
With the optimal conditions identified in our model reaction
system, the substrate scope was subsequently investigated. As
shown in Scheme 2, a variety of cysteine derivatives performed
well in the InCl3-mediated aziridine ring-opening reactions to
provide ββ-MeLan derivatives (e.g., 3a−c,e,f) in good yields.
To our delight, the reaction also worked well when the C-
terminal cysteine carboxyl group was not protected; 3g and 3h
were obtained in yield of 88% and 50%, respectively. These
products can be directly utilized for further peptide assembly
or for direct preparation of unusual S-[(Z)-2-aminovinyl]-
(3S)-3-methyl-D-cysteine (AviMeCys)an important unit of
several lantibiotics (including mersacidin) with highly potent
biological activitiesvia diphenylphosphoryl azide (DPPA)-
mediated decarboxylation15 or Ni-promoted decarbonylation
of amino acid thioesters.16 In general, our data appear to
support the notion that better yields are obtained in reactions
that do not utilize reaction partners with acid-labile protecting
groups (e.g., Boc, tert-butyl).
After the exploration of the substrate scope, we tested our
optimized substrates and reaction conditions for a large-scale
synthesis of ββ-MeLan (Scheme 3). To our delight, the yields
remained consistent with those observed in our model systems
when the reactions were carried out on a small scale. For
example, reactions 1 and 2 (Scheme 3) proceeded smoothly to
deliver over 30g of ββ-MeLan 3g and 3b in yields of 86% and
62%, respectively.
As noted in Table 1, ZnCl2, Ag(cod)2PF6, LiClO4, In(OTf)3,
and DABCO failed to afford the desired product 3a (Table 1,
entries 1−4 and 6). BiCl3 and InBr3 gave 3a in yields of 20%
and 36%, respectively (Table 1, entries 5 and 7). When the
mixture of 1a and 2a was treated with InCl3 in DCM at room
temperature, product 3a was obtained in 52% yield (Table 1,
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX