Substitution Reactions of the Ramirez Ylide
SCHEME 1. Azulene Synthesis from Ramirez Ylide (R1/R2 ) CH3, C2H5, and (CH3)3C)
SCHEME 2. Proposed Route to Geminal-Substituted
substituted at the 3-position), with that of triphenylphosphonium
2-(Z-(R,â-dicarbomethoxyvinyl)cyclopentadienylide 7, which we
have previously confirmed as substituted at the 2-position, also
by virtue of an X-ray crystal structure.5 Figure 2 illustrates that,
as expected, the coupling patterns for the cyclopentadienylide
protons of the two compounds are very different. H5 and H3
both couple to H4 for 7, whereas for 5, only H4 and H5 couple
strongly together (see Supporting Information for further
comment).
Adductsa (R/R1 ) Carbonyl, Ester, or Cyano Groups)a
a Reagents and conditions: (i) POCl3/DMF (-15 °C), (ii) activated
methylene compound using Knoevenagel conditions.
When the formyl ylide 4 prepared by us is subjected to the
same analysis, we find that the NMR is consistent with
substitution at the 3- and not the 2-position; by way of
confirmation, a 1H NOE experiment (with variable mixing times;
see Supporting Information) showed a correlation between H4
and H5, and another between H2, H4 and the aldehyde proton.
to show that formylation had in fact given the 3-substituted
isomer 4. This was because the compound formed could be
subsequently reacted (Scheme 3) with dimethyl malonate under
Knoevenagel conditions to give 5, the structure of which was
established by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1). Similar reaction
with methyl cyanoacetate gave the analogous adduct 6 with the
nitrile group syn to the ring, again established by X-ray (Figure
1).4 The structural parameters of compounds 5 and 6 compare
well with our previous work5 and that of others.6
A
1H-31P correlation showed cross-peaks for each of the
cyclopentadienylide protons with the phosphorus resonance at
14.2 ppm, although the correlation is weaker for H4 (these
spectra are reproduced in the Supporting Information). These
additional NMR experiments for structural confirmation were
important, because use of the COSY analysis alone can be
misleading, as it may show coupling between all the ring protons
in certain cases; for instance, in the reaction of 1 with tetrahalo-
p-benzoquinones to give 3-substituted ring products, both 3JHH
and 4JHH coupling were observed.7 Two other intriguing NMR
phenomena are encountered when analyzing these systems: (i)
there are occasionally no observable correlations between certain
5-membered ring protons with any carbon in the HSQC NMR
and (ii) extreme broadening of some resonances in the 13C NMR
hindered their identification.8
To a certain extent it is understandable that the original
workers misassigned the structure of compound 4, because it
was consistent with the results with some other electrophiles
1
(see below) and was not ruled out by the H NMR spectrum.
However, it is notable in hindsight that the presence of 31P
coupling to the three cyclopentadienylide protons serves to
complicate matters and would make such an analysis difficult.
Furthermore, it is important to note that there is occasionally a
4JHH coupling observed between H2 and H4 and H5 in the
3-substituted compoundssa feature noted previously7sdepending
on the threshold value employed in the NMR processing
We also found that the IR spectrum of 4 showed a carbonyl
band at 1632 cm-1 (cf. the 1640 cm-1 reported).3 Freeman and
Lloyd9 have suggested that the carbonyl stretch can distinguish
between 2- and 3-substitution in the acetyl derivatives; the
former leads to a lowering of the V(CO) absorption as a result
of the resonance canonical structure, whereby a negative charge
on the oxygen atom takes part in an intramolecular association
with the heteronium atom. A 3,5-diformylated derivative
(phenyls at the 2- and 4-positions) was reported in the same
paper as having two carbonyl stretches at 1622 and 1645 cm-1
and the 3,4-diformylcyclopentadienylide made by us (see below)
has a V(CO) absorption at 1647 cm-1, so it appears this method
has some validity. It should also be noted that the UV spectra
of 4 determined by us does differ somewhat from that reported
in that we did not find a band at 370 nm. We attribute this to
contamination by decomposition products, well-known in the
case of the parent Ramirez ylide.
1
package. In the H-1H COSY spectra, the magnitude of this
3
coupling appears less than the JHH coupling between H4 and
H5. However, this smaller coupling has the potential to be
misleading if used as the sole method of analysis; the phenom-
enon presumably owes its origins to the high degree of
delocalization in the compounds.
In order to provide an accurate and straightforward method
for the secure assignment of the products obtained when 1 reacts
with a variety of electrophiles (in lieu of samples suitable for
X-ray crystallographic analysis), we compared the 1H-1H
COSY NMR spectra of compound 5 (proven here to be
(4) Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structures
in this paper have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Centre as supplementary publication numbers CCDC 272186 (5),
272187 (6), 633415 (8) and 633413 (9). Copies of the data can be obtained,
free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge,
ac.uk].
The misassignment of the structure of compound 4 (and some
other structures; see below) is quite unfortunate, because both
these authors and subsequent workers have relied on it in trying
to understand electrophilic substitution of the Ramirez ylide.
Thus Yoshida and co-workers went to considerable lengths in
(5) Higham, L. J.; Kelly, P. G.; Muller-Bunz, H.; Gilheany, D. G. Acta
Crystallogr. C 2004, 60, o308-o311.
(6) See, for instance, (a) Huy, N. H. T.; Compain, C.; Ricard, L.; Mathey,
F. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 650, 57-58. (b) Ammon, H. L.; Wheeler,
G. L.; Watts, P. H., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6158-6163. (c) Holy,
N. L.; Baenziger, N. C.; Flynn, R. M.; Swenson, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1976, 98, 7823-7824.
(7) Pons, M.; Pe´rez Pla, F.; Valero, R.; Hall, C. D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1996, 2, 1011-1019.
(8) A full listing of these issues is given in the Supporting Information.
(9) Freeman, B. H.; Lloyd, D. Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 2257-2264.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 23, 2007 8781