Because of their ability to generate “druggable”-forms of
artificial peptides and peptidomimetics due to resistance to
the enzymatic degradation, the use of â-amino acid scaffolds
is well-documented in the literature.9-11 In addition to this,
there are also examples of highly potent bioactive natural
products (e.g., taxol) that contain the â-amino acid func-
tionality. The cyclic â-amino acids have also been utilized
as building blocks leading to the generation of bioactive
architectures.12-14
With the objective of developing the high-throughput
synthesis of benzofuran flavonoid-inspired compounds, we
have developed a practical enantioselective synthesis of a
new class of cyclic â-amino acid having the benzofuran
scaffold. Through combining these two important features
(i.e., benzofuran scaffold and cyclic â-amino acid functional-
ity), we were interested in generating a wide-variety of
benzofuran-derived compounds that could be subjected to
biological evaluation, in particular, in the search of small
molecule modulators of cell migration. In post angiogenesis
state of cancer, tumor cell invasion is one of the most critical
steps prior to metastasis15 and the latter is responsible for
about 90% death among all cancer patients.16-18 Thus, there
is a strong interest in finding small molecules that could
function as cell migration inhibitor and further could slow
the cancer invasion to prevent metastasis.19-22
lation reaction,23,24 which worked very well even on a
large scale (15.0 gram scale) and the N-protected amino
hydroxyl product, 5 was obtained in 75% yield (ee > 95%).
The hydroxyl group was then tosylated to obtain 6, which
to our delight, under hydrogenation conditions in the pre-
sence of a mild base (K2CO3), afforded the benzofuran
derivative 7 following deprotection of the amino and the
phenolic hydroxyl groups and the nucleophillic displacement
of -OTs by the phenolic hydroxyl generated in situ. This
process is highly simple, practical and both enantiomers of
â-amino acids could be easily obtained in large quan-
tities depending on the chirality of the ligand used for the
aminohydroxylation reaction. The N-alloc protection of
this novel cyclic â-amino acid 7 gave 8 as the crystalline
solid that was further confirmed by X-ray crystallographic
studies.
As a test study (Scheme 2), compound 7 was con-
verted to 9 in a few steps that included N-alkylation (N-
para-bromobenzyl ) NPBB) of the benzylic nitrogen,
followed by N-alloc protection and conversion of the
carboxyl moiety to aldehyde by sequential reduction
(LiBH4) to alcohol, followed by oxidation (Dess-Martin
periodinane) of the hydroxyl derivative. Using the ring
closing metathesis as the key reaction, the next step was to
explore the synthesis of different tricyclic architectures from
compound 9.
In one study, the Wittig olefination of the aldehyde,
followed by N-alloc removal gave the secondary benzyl
amine 10, which was then N-acryloylated to obtain the
precursor for the ring closing metathesis for developing the
six-membered unsaturated lactam ring moiety. This was
nicely achieved in good yields by the use of 10 mol % second
generation Grubbs’ catalyst, to obtain compound 11. To
explore the unsaturated lactam functionality as a potential
diversity generating site, it was then independently subjected
to three thiols (e.g., PhSH, BnSH, PhCH2CH2SH) producing
the 1,4-thiol adducts 12a, 12b, and 12c as single diastere-
omers.
To develop the enantioeselective synthesis of benzofuran
derived cyclic â-amino acid scaffolds, 2,4-dihydroxyben-
zaldehyde (3) was subjected to a selective stepwise phenolic
hydroxyl protections as -OMEM and -OBn (Scheme 1).
Following the two carbon chain extension by Wittig-Horner
reaction, it was then subjected to Sharpless aminohydroxy-
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Optically Enriched Benzofuran
Scaffold
(8) Schoepfer, J.; Fretz, H.; Chaudhuri, B.; Muller, L.; Seeber, E.;
Meijer, L.; Lozach, O.; Vangrevelinghe, E.; Furet, P. J. Med. Chem. 2002,
45, 1741.
(9) Liu, M.; Sibi, M. P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7991.
(10) Sibi, M. P.; Patil, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1235.
(11) Sibi, M. P.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8064.
(12) Porter, E. A.; Wang, X.; Lee, H. S.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H.
Nature 2000, 404, 565.
(13) Fulop, F. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 2181.
(14) Karlsson, A. J.; Pomerantz, W. C.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H.;
Palecek, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12630.
(15) Woodhouse, E. C.; Chuaqui, R. F.; Liotta, L. A. Cancer 1997, 80,
1529.
(16) Wittekind, C.; Neid, M. Oncology 2005, 69 Suppl 1, 14.
(17) Fidler, I. J. Differentiation 2002, 70, 498.
(18) Fidler, I. J. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2002, 12, 89.
(19) Metaferia, B. B.; Chen, L.; Baker, H. L.; Huang, X. Y.; Bewley, C.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2434.
(20) Njardarson, J. T.; Gaul, C.; Shan, D.; Huang, X.-Y.; Danishefsky,
S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1038.
(21) Gaul, C.; Njardarson, J. T.; Shan, D.; Dorn, D. C.; Wu, K.-D.; Tong,
W. P.; Huang, X.-Y.; Moore, M. A. S.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 11326.
(22) Fenteany, G.; Zhu, S. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 593.
(23) Li, G.; Angert, H. H.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996, 35, 2813.
(24) Li, G.; Chang, H.-T.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996, 35, 451.
1144
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008