Shuojin Wang et al.
FULL PAPERS
+
Preparations of Tetraalkylammonium (R N ) Based
ILs
residue was purified with silica gel (200–300 mesh) column
chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether/EtOAc=10/1).
All products were identified by comparing their melting
4
+
The used tetraalkylammonium (R N ) Based ILs were syn-
thesized by two-step reactions according to the literature
Figure 1).
1
4
points and H NMR spectra with those of standard samples.
[11]
The catalyst/ionic liquid layer was directly reused for the
next run if necessary after it was heated to 1008C for 4 h
under vacuum (0.1 Torr).
(
+
Preparations of Trialkylammonium (R NH ) Based
3
ILs
The trialkylammonium based ILs were synthesized through
neutralization of trialkylamine with stoichiometric amounts Acknowledgements
of HNTf in distilled water. The structures of ILs were char-
acterized by H NMR and F NMR (Figure 1). All of the
ILs were dried under vacuum in 908C overnight before use.
2
1
19
The authors would like to thank Dr. Xiaoyong Li for his val-
uable help to this work.
Tributylammonium
bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide
1
[
NH444
] ACHTUNGTRENNUNG[ NTf ]: H NMR (CDCl , TMS): d=6.86 (broad
2
3
peak, 1H, -NH), 3.09 (m, 6H, -N-CH -), 1.67 (m, 6H, -CH -
2
2
CH CH ), 1.39 (m, 6H, -CH -CH ), 0.99 (m, 9H, -CH ); References
2
3
2
3
3
1
9
F NMR (CDCl , CCl F): d=À78.89 (s).
3
3
Trihexylammonium
bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide
[1] a) G. A. Olah, R. Malhotra, S. C. Narang, Nitration,
Methods and Mechanisms, Wiley-VCH, New York,
1989; b) K. Schofield, Aromatic Nitration, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1980; c) R. Taylor, Elec-
trophilic Aromatic Substitution, John Wiley & Sons,
Chichester, 1990.
1
[
NH666
]
A[ NTf ]: H NMR (CDCl , TMS): d=6.60 (s, 1H,
C
H
T
U
N
G
T
R
E
N
N
U
N
G
2
3
-
NH), 3.03 (m, 6H, -N-CH -), 1.66 (s, 6H, -CH -C H CH ),
2 2 3 6 3
1
.33 (s,18H, -C H -CH ), 0.90 (t, J=5.8 Hz, 9H, -CH );
3
6
3
3
19
F NMR (CDCl , CCl F): d=À78.85 (s).
3
3
[
2] a) F. J. Waller, A. G. M. Barrett, D. C. Braddock, D.
Ramparsad, Chem. Commun. 1997, 6, 613–614; b) F. J.
Waller, A. G. M. Barrett, D. C. Braddock, D. Rampar-
sad, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 641–1642; c) F. J.
Waller, A. G. M. Barrett, D. C. Braddock, R. M.
McKinnell, D. Ramparsad, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.
1 1999, 867–872; d) S. Kobayashi, M. Sugiura, H. Kita-
gawa, W. L. W. Lam, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2227–2302;
e) M. Shi, S. C. Cui, Chem. Commun. 2002, 9, 994–995.
Measurement of Kamlet–Taft Parameter b of ILs
4
-Nitroaniline and N,N-diethyl-4-nitroaniline were dissolved
À5
À4
respectively in ILs in a concentration range 10 to 10
mol/L and the ILs were dried under vacuum at 808C for
2 h before use. The sample was loaded into a dry cuvette in
1
a glove box and the cuvette was then capped and sealed.
The UV-vis absorbance was measured and fitted with a
[12]
Gaussian profile according to literature procedures. The
temperature was controlled with an SYC temperature con-
troller (Æ0.18C).
[3] a) T. Welton, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071–2083; b) P.
Wasserscheid, T. Welton, Ionic Liquids in Synthesis
Wiley-VCH, Weiheim, 2002, pp 191–192; c) K. K.
Laali, V. J. Gettwert, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 35–40;
d) R. Rajagopal, K. V. Srinivasan, Synth. Commun.
2003, 33, 961–966; e) G. B. Cheng, X. L. Duan, X. F.
Qi, C. Lu, Catal. Commun. 2008, 10, 201–204.
[4] a) N. L. Lancaster, V. Llopis-Mestre, Chem. Commun.
2003, 22, 2812–2813; b) K. Smith, S. F. Liu, A. G. El-
Hiti, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 8611–8615;
c) B. D. Powell, G. L. Powell C. P. Reeves, Lett. Org.
Chem. 2005, 550–553; d) S. J. Wang, Z. Y. Sun, J. Nie,
Chin. J. Chem. 2008, 26, 2256–2260.
Measurements of the Lewis Acidity
Typically, 1.0 mL of IL, 1.0 mL of nitromethane solutions of
À1
the Ln
A
C
H
T
U
N
G
T
R
E
N
N
U
N
G
(NTf ) (0.15 mmolmL ) and 0.1 mL of nitromethane
2
3
[9b]
solutions of the 2,4,4’,6-tetramethoxyazobenzene
(0.3
À1
mmolmL ) were mixed. The resultant ILs were dried under
vacuum at 808C for 12 h before use. A sample was loaded
into a dry cuvette in a glove box and the cuvette was then
capped and sealed. The UV-vis determination was carried
out in the range of 350–700 nm.
[
5] a) S. T. Handy, C. R. Egrie, ACS Symp. Ser. 2002, 818,
1
3
34–146; b) K. Qiao, C. Yokoyama. Chem. Lett. 2004,
3, 808–809; c) D. Fang, Q. R. Shi, J. Cheng, K. Gong,
Catalytic Reactions
Typically, 5 mmol of IL with catalyst were dried under
vacuum for 1 h before the reaction. 0.32 mL of toluene
Z. L. Liu, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2008, 345, 158–163.
[6] a) J. Nie, H. Kobayashi, T. Sonoda, Catal. Today 1997,
36, 81–84; b) J. Nie, J. Xu, G. Y. Zhou, J. Chem. Res.
Syn. 1999, 7, 446–447; c) Y. B. Yuan, J. Nie, Z. B.
Zhang, S. J. Wang, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2005, 295, 170–
176; d) Y. B. Yuan, J. Nie, S. J. Wang, Z. B. Zhang,
Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 25, 394–398.
[7] a) M. J. Kamlet, R. W. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976,
98, 377–383; b) R. W. Taft, M. J. Kamlet, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1976, 98, 2886–2894; c) M. J. Kamlet, J. L.
Abboud, M. H. Abraham, R. W. Taft, J. Org. Chem.
1983, 48, 2877–2887.
(
3.0 mmol) were added into the IL, followed by dropwise
addition of 0.13 mL of 95% nitric acid (3.0 mmol). The reac-
tion mixture was stirred at 858C for several hours. After
stopped the reaction, the product was extracted with a mix-
ture of hexane and ether. The combined organic extracts
was washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution, dried over
MgSO , and analyzed by gas chromatography using the in-
4
ternal standard method (n-decane, 1.54 mmol).
In order to determine the isolated yields of nitration prod-
ucts, we removed the solvent under reduced pressure; the
1944
ꢁ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1939 – 1945