H. Tsutsumi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 723–726
725
In the kinetic studies of ester hydrolysis, Boc-l-alanine
p-nitrophenyl ester (l-AlaONp) and Boc-d-alanine
p-nitrophenyl ester (d-AlaONp) were chosen as sub-
strates. The hydrolysis was performed in various pHs of
phosphate buffer solution and monitored as increasing
UV–vis absorbance of the product, p-nitrophenolate
(320 or 400 nm). In all measurements, the concentration
of each catalyst was fixed at 2.0Â10À5 M. The substrate
concentration was varied from 1.0Â10À4 to 5.0Â10À4 M
(l- and d-AlaONp). Excess conditions of the substrates
were kept in each measurement. The pH dependence in
initial rates of hydrolysis was measured under the con-
ditions of the fixed substrate concentration of 3.0Â10À4
M. Both catalysts had a maximum point around pH 6.5
in the hydrolysis of l-AlaONp and d-AlaONp. Since
the secondary structure of the catalysts do not sig-
nificantly depend on pH, the existence of a maximum
point must arise from two imidazole groups. Two
imidazole groups might exist as a protonated form and
a free form, which could work as a general acid and a
general base catalysts in this pH.12 Then, kinetic ana-
lyses for the ester hydrolysis by b(AD)-AH and b-HH
were performed at pH 6.5 and obtained kinetic para-
meters are summarized in Table 1. In the absence of any
catalyst, the rate constants of the hydrolyses for
d-AlaONp and l-AlaONp (kun) were 1.86Â10À5 sÀ1
(1.02Â10À4 M) to b-HH (1.63Â10À4 M) for l-AlaONp.
On the other hand, the Km value of b(AD)-AH for
d-AlaONp (7.66Â10À4 M) was slightly inferior to that
of b-HH (6.75Â10À4 M). As a result, b(AD)-AH
showed higher selectivity for l-AlaONp (7.5 fold) than
b-HH (4.1 fold). This result suggests that the higher
substrate selectivity of b(AD)-AH for l-AlaONp might
be due to the hydrophobic site constructed with Ile and
Tyr residues of two peptide chains. The hydrophobic
site constructed with two b-hairpin peptides would serve
favorably for the l-AlaONp binding. Thus, the two-b-
hairpin peptide-bCD conjugate, b(AD)-AH, gained the
higher catalytic activity for l-AlaONp than d-AlaONp
(6.3 times higher kcat/Km value).
In this study, we have demonstrated that the b-hairpin
peptide is useful as a new scaffold to arrange the func-
tional groups and construct substrate binding subsite in
the peptide-CD conjugates. The usage of two b-hairpin
peptides is effective for the selective substrate recogni-
tion and catalysis. Although the reported peptide
sequence is used as a model case in this study, design
and selection of new b-hairpin scaffold suitable for cat-
alysis will lead to the higher reaction and recognition
abilities with smaller artificial molecules.
and 1.89Â10À5
s
À1, respectively. In the presence of cat-
alysts, b(AD)-AH showed higher kcat values than b-HH
for both substrates. Because the secondary structure of
b(AD)-AH appeared to be more stable than that of b-HH,
two histidine residues of b(AD)-AH were fixed at their
appropriate positions so as to hydrolyze the substrates
efficiently, resulting that b(AD)-AH showed the higher
kcat values as compared with b-HH. However, b-HH
also showed the maximum point for ester hydrolysis
around pH 6.5, two histidine residues of b-hairpin pep-
tide might be arranged near the bCD cavity and act
cooperatively on the catalytic center. The Km values of
b(AD)-AH for l-AlaONp and d-AlaONp were
1.02Â10À4 M and 7.66Â10À4 M. b(AD)-AH showed 7.5
times superior Km value for l-AlaONp. It is noted that
there was no significant difference in Km values between
l-AlaONp and d-AlaONp by the reported bis-imida-
zole modified bCDs (for example, l-AlaONp: 8.0Â10À4
M and d-AlaONp: 6.0Â10À4 M).12b In addition,
b(AD)-AH showed a superior Km value to bis-imidazole
modified bCDs for l-AlaONp, while b(AD)-AH
showed almost the same value for d-AlaONp. These
results suggest that the selectivity of b(AD)-AH for
l-AlaONp is derived from the b-hairpin peptide scaf-
fold. b(AD)-AH showed the slightly superior Km value
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Nihon Shokuhin Kako Co., Ltd. for
a generous supply of cyclodextrins. This work was
partly supported by
a Grant-in-Aid for Science
Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Techniology, and the COE21 pro-
gram in Tokyo Institute of Technology.
References and notes
1. (a) Stevenson, J. D.;Thomas, N. R. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000,
17, 535. (b) Matsuo, T.;Hayashi, T.;Hisaeda, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11234.
2. Motherwell, W. B.;Bingham, M. J.;Six, Y. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 4663.
3. (a) For the review of cyclodextrin as enzyme mimics:
Breslow, R.;Dong, S. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1997. (b)
Komiyama, M.;Shigekawa, H. Comprehensive Supramo-
lecular Chemistry, Vol. 3. Cyclodextrins;Szejtli, J.;Osa,
T., Ed.;Pergamon: Oxford, New York, Tokyo, 1996, p
401.
4. (a) For the review of de novo design of peptides:
DeGrado, W. F.;Summa, C. M.;Pavone, V.;Nastri, F.;
Lombardi, A. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 779. (b)
Schneider, J. P.;Kelly, J. W. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2164.
5. (a) Tsutsumi, H.;Hamasaki, K.;Mihara, H.;Ueno, A.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 741. (b) Tsutsumi, H.;
Hamasaki, K.;Mihara, H.;Ueno, A. J. Chem. Soc., Per-
kin Trans. 2 2000, 1813.
Table 1. Kinetic parameters for the hydrolysis of Boc-l-alanine p-
nitrophenyl ester (l-AlaONp) and Boc-d-alanine p-nitrophenyl ester
(d-AlaONp) catalyzed by b(AD)-AH and b-HH at 25 ꢀC in pH 6.5
phosphate buffer solution (5.0Â10À2 M)
6. (a) Obataya, I.;Sakamoto, S.;Ueno, A.;Mihara, H. Bio-
polymers 2001, 59, 65. (b) Tomizaki, K.;Tsunekawa, Y.;
Akisada, H.;Mihara, H.;Nishiso, N. J. Chem. Soc., Per-
kin Trans. 2 2000, 813.
7. (a) Nesloney, C. L.;Kelly, J. W. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
1996, 4, 739. (b) Ramirez-Alvarado, M.;Kortemme, T.;
Blanco, F. J.;Serrano, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 93.
Catalyst
Substrate
kcat
[10À4 sÀ1
km
[10À4 M]
kcat/Km
[MÀ1 s1]
]
b(AD)-AH
b-HH
l-AlaONp
d-AlaONp
l-AlaONp
d-AlaONp
12.1
14.4
8.89
10.0
1.02
7.66
1.63
6.75
11.9
1.88
5.45
1.48