1864 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 76, No. 9 (2003)
Ó 2003 The Chemical Society of Japan
solution of NaHCO3 (5%, 20 mL) was added. The aqueous mix-
ture was extracted with diethyl ether (3 ꢃ 20 mL). The organic
layer was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. Final purification
on a silica gel column afforded the desired products in 75–83%
yields.
Spectral and Physical Data of the Products. Entry 1: Mp
6
35 C (lit. 37 C), mp of semicarbazone derivative 195–197 C
ꢂ
ꢂ
ꢂ
6
(lit. 197–198 C).
ꢂ
Entry 2: Mp 34 ꢂC (lit.6 36–37 ꢂC), mp of semicarbazone de-
Scheme 2.
6
rivative 178–180 C (lit. 179–180 C).
ꢂ
ꢂ
ical and environmental advantages of solvent-free reactions.4
Al(HSO4)3 is proposed as a very good successor for AlCl3
in other organic reactions.
Entry 3: Mp 23 ꢂC (lit.7 22 ꢂC), mp of oxime derivative 83 ꢂC
7
(lit. 86 C).
ꢂ
8
Entry 4: Mp of oxime derivative 105–106 C (lit. 107 C).
ꢂ
ꢂ
8
Entry 5: Mp of oxime derivative 77 C (lit. 78 C).
ꢂ
ꢂ
Experimental
Entry 6: Mp 25–27 ꢂC (lit.6 26–27 ꢂC), mp of semicarbazone
6
derivative 170–172 C (lit. 171–172 C).
ꢂ
ꢂ
The products were characterized by comparison of their spec-
tral data (1H NMR, IR) and physical properties with those reported
in the literature. 1H NMR spectra were run on a Bruker Avance
200 MHz spectrometer. IR spectra were obtained by a Shimadzu
470 spectrophotometer. The progress of the reactions was fol-
lowed by TLC using silica gel Polygrams SIL G/UV 254
Sheets. All yields refer to isolated products.
Entry 7: Mp 28–30 ꢂC (lit.6 29–30 ꢂC), mp of semicarbazone
6
derivative 182 C (lit. 181–183 C).
ꢂ
ꢂ
9
Entry 8: Mp 27–29 C (lit. 28 C), mp of oxime derivative
ꢂ
ꢂ
9
ꢂ
ꢂ
77 C (lit. 79 C).
Entry 9: IR (KBr), ꢀ (cmꢁ1): 3050(w), 2950(s), 2910(s),
1673(s), 1600(s), 1472(m), 1255(s), 1230(s), 1020(s), 795(s);
1H NMR (CDCl3), ꢁ 7.9 (2H, d, J ¼ 8:8 Hz), 6.9 (2H, d,
J ¼ 8:8 Hz), 3.8 (2H, d, J ¼ 6:5 Hz), 3.0 (2H, q, J ¼ 7:3 Hz),
2.1 (1H, m, J ¼ 6:8 Hz), 0.8–1.5 (9H, m); mp 44 ꢂC, mp of
Preparation of Aluminum Hydrogensulfate. A 500 mL suc-
tion flask was equipped with a constant-pressure dropping funnel.
The gas outlet was connected to a vacuum system through an ad-
sorbing solution (water) and an alkali trap. Anhydrous aluminum
chloride (33.4 g, 0.25 mol) was charged in the flask and concen-
trated sulfuric acid (98%, 73.5 g, 0.75 mol) was added dropwise
over a period of 30 min at room temperature. HCl evolved
immediately. After completion of the addition, the mixture was
shaken for 30 min, while the residual HCl was eliminated by
suction. Finally, a pale-brown solid material was obtained in 77
g. Al(HSO4)3 was characterized by the determination of its Hþ
content by titration with NaOH (Calcd 0.95%, Found 0.96%)
ꢂ
2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative 155–157 C.
Entry 10: IR (neat), ꢀ (cmꢁ1): 3050(w), 2930(s), 1675(s),
1600(s), 1460(m), 1250(s), 1220(s), 795(m); 1H NMR (CDCl3),
ꢁ 7.8 (2H, d, J ¼ 8:7 Hz), 6.8 (2H, d, J ¼ 8:7 Hz), 3.9 (2H, t, J ¼
6:7 Hz), 2.9 (2H, q, J ¼ 7:3 Hz), 0.7–1.6 (14H, m); mp of 2,4-di-
ꢂ
nitrophenylhydrazone derivative 161–163 C.
We are grateful to Razi University Research Council for fi-
nancial support of this work.
2ꢁ
and SO4
by precipitation with Ba2þ (Calcd 90.57%, Found
90.48%). Al3þ was determined by two methods; conversion to
Al2O3 (Calcd 8.48%, Found 8.31%) and spectrophotometric de-
termination by complex formation with aluminon (Calcd 8.48%,
Found 8.38%).5
References
1
G. A. Olah, ‘‘Friedel–Crafts and Related Reactions,’’
Vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1963).
General Procedure for the Acylation of Alkoxybenzenes in
Nitromethane. Aluminum hydrogensulfate (0.45 mmol) was
added to a solution of alkoxybenzene (3 mmol) and acid anhy-
dride (6 mmol) in nitromethane (10 mL). The mixture was stirred
magnetically at 65–70 ꢂC for an appropriate period of time
(Table 1). The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC
(eluent: hexane/diethyl ether: 2/1). Then, nitromethane was
evaporated under reduced pressure and a solution of NaHCO3
(5%, 20 mL) was added. The aqueous mixture was extracted with
diethyl ether (3 ꢃ 20 mL). The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4)
and concentrated. Final purification on a silica gel column afford-
ed the desired products in 72–83% yields.
2
(1984).
3
J. A. Hyat and P. W. Raynolds, J. Org. Chem., 49, 384
a) P. Salehi, M. M. Khodaei, M. A. Zolfigol, and A.
Keyvan, Synth. Commun., 31, 1947 (2001). b) P. Salehi, M. M.
Khodaei, M. A. Zolfigol, and A. Keyvan, Monatsh. Chem., 133,
1291 (2002), and references cited therein.
4
5
K. Tanaka and F. Toda, Chem. Rev., 100, 1025 (2000).
A. I. Vogel, ‘‘Quantitative Inorganic Analysis,’’ Longman,
London (1972), pp. 462, 472, 792.
X. A. Dominguez, B. Gomez, J. Slim, D. Giesecke, and E.
Ureta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76, 5150 (1954).
R. E. Lutz, R. K. Allison, G. Ashburn, P. S. Bailey, M. T.
6
7
General Procedure for Acylation Reactions under Solvent-
Free Conditions.
Clark, J. F. Codington, A. J. Deinet, J. A. Freek, R. H. Jordan, N.
H. Leake, T. A. Martin, K. C. Nicodemus, R. J. Towlett, N. H.
Shearer, J. D. Smith, and J. W. Wilson, J. Org. Chem., 12, 617
(1947).
Alkoxybenzene (3 mmol), acid anhydride
(3.6 mmol) and aluminum hydrogensulfate (0.45 mmol) were
placed in a mortar and mixed. The mixture was heated at 65–
70 ꢂC in an oven for an appropriate period of time (Table 1).
Progress of the reaction was followed by dissolving a sample in
dichloromethane and monitoring by TLC (eluent: hexane/diethyl
ether: 2/1). The mixture was cooled to room temperature and a
8
E. Eckhart and J. Varga, Mag. Kem. Foly., 67, 509 (1961);
Chem. Abstr., 56, 15557e (1962).
E. Hanning and G. Leuschner, Pharm. Zentralhalle, 96,
570 (1957); Chem. Abstr., 52, 14078d (1958).
9